A survey published today by Synopsys, a provider of electronic design automation (EDA) and application security tools, finds nearly half (48%) of respondents admit they consciously push code with known vulnerabilities into production because of time constraints.
Based on a survey of 378 cybersecurity professionals conducted by Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) on behalf of Synopsys, the survey also finds 65% of respondents said developers in their organization are participating in a formal security training program.
However, only a third (34%) are employing application security tools across more than three-quarters of their codebase. And, as the rate at which code is created increases, only 30% expect they will be able to protect more than three-quarters of their codebase 12 months from now despite the fact that more than half (56%) said they apply highly integrated sets of security controls throughout their DevOps process.
Nearly three-quarters (72%) also said their organization makes use of 10 or more application security tools.
Patrick Carey, director of product marketing for the Software Integrity Group at Synopsys, said the survey shows many organizations are making trade-offs between potential risks to the business and the desire to deliver software faster. As the rate at which updates to applications are being delivered increases, thanks largely to the adoption of best DevOps processes, Carey noted it becomes easier to justify knowingly allowing vulnerable code to be deployed in a production environment. The assumption is that most severe vulnerabilities will be prioritized while less critical vulnerabilities are addressed over the course of the application lifecycle management process.
In most organizations, the survey finds either a development manager or the application security analyst is responsible for making these decisions. Just under a third of organizations make both jointly responsible. More than three-quarters (78%) also report their security analysts are directly engaged with their developers. Just under a third (31%) work directly with developers to review individual features and code, compared to 28% who work with developers on threat modeling and 19% that participate in daily scrums.
The survey finds that integrations that complement high-velocity application development process are critical for 43% of respondents. As a result, more organizations are looking for application security tools that can be directly embedded within an integrated development environment (IDE), noted Carey.
However, the fact that application security tools are shifting further left does not mean organization won’t also have to invest in other tools that are embedded within DevOps platforms that manage runtime deployments, added Carey.
As is always the case when it comes to best DevSecOps practices, the two biggest challenges are getting the right tools in the hands of developers and then aligning workflows between development and cybersecurity teams. The survey suggests substantial progress has been made on the latter, while tools for developers are increasingly becoming available. After all, most developers want to do the right thing when it comes to application security. The issue is determining what precisely that means.
