Redesigning Entry-Level Tech Roles To Build Better Judgment

Give Them Room To Make Decisions

I think we underestimate the astuteness of the younger generation in the workforce. They’ve grown up digitally native, some of them even AI-native, and at times are far more discerning about technology than senior leaders. We need to put people into positions to make mistakes and make decisions. - Erik Jost, Black Box

Redesign Junior Roles Around Judgment

Automate repetitive work carelessly, and you may automate the apprenticeship with it. Redesign junior roles around diagnosis, exceptions, challenge and explanation—the moments where judgment is actually built. - Kelvin Cheema, Acuity Analytics

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Use AI To Strengthen Critical Thinking

The purpose of an entry-level role has never been just to produce output—it’s to build confidence, judgment and resilience. AI should automate routine work so young professionals can spend more time learning, asking better questions and developing the critical thinking that drives future leaders. - Bhavna Juneja, Infinity, a Stamford Technology Company

Have Them Build Before They Review

The instinct now is to put juniors in the review seat, but reviewing is the harder, more senior skill. At Google, engineers had to earn a certification before they could approve anyone else’s code, because you cannot judge work you have never done yourself. Let the junior write the first version, let AI critique it and then have a senior review the disagreement. - Prashant Jalan, Guickly

Give Them Ownership Of Outcomes

Give junior employees ownership of a real outcome, not a list of tasks. Let them ship, measure the result, deal with the consequences and iterate—with guardrails that protect critical systems. AI can accelerate output, but judgment comes from repeated exposure to what actually works. Gradually increase the ambition, and their sense of feasibility and impact will grow with it. - Pavlo Razumovskyi, Coframe Inc.

Let Them Make Reversible Decisions

Give each junior a small reversibility budget: authority to change one real workflow, provided the move can be undone within a day and has a clear stop signal. Before acting, they must name the assumption, likely second-order effects and evidence that would reverse their view. Afterward, compare the forecast with the impact. Seniors coach the quality of the wager, not whether it happened to win. This turns judgment into repeated, accountable practice. Raise scope as skill grows. - Jagadish Gokavarapu, Wissen Infotech

Make Them Accountable For AI-Assisted Work

Tech companies can redesign junior roles around AI-assisted problem-solving, not task completion. Give early-career employees real problems to investigate and require them to validate AI outputs, explain their decisions and learn from mistakes. The goal is to make AI a collaborator while humans remain accountable for judgment. - Deepali Kaushik, NBCUniversal

Bring Them Closer To Business Decisions

Execution was never just execution. Implementing the work was how juniors learned the senior job. AI does much of that raw execution now, so we have to find ways to get junior teammates closer to the business earlier: the customer, the real problems and the strategic calls. The “how” used to teach the “why.” Now, the “why” has to be taught directly. - Andrew Higgins, Parsnipp

Rotate Them Through Diverse Experiences

Entry-level roles are essential to building a strong talent pipeline. Rather than focusing on deep technical training, organizations should give junior employees structured rotations. These roles should help them validate AI outputs, understand AI systems, frame problems and break them down before proposing solutions. This experience builds judgment and develops “10x employees” who combine AI fluency with critical thinking. - Ram Palaniappan, TEKsystems Global Services LLC

Balance AI-Assisted And Independent Work

Give them a few tasks and shut off AI access, and give them a few tasks with AI access. The former helps them understand context, customers, business case and logic in depth. The latter helps them become more productive. - Shardul Lavekar, 100x

Pair AI Practice With Senior Feedback

In product, I’d have junior team members role-play scenarios with AI, then meet with more senior people to walk through how they arrived at their answers. AI can give you an answer quickly, but that doesn’t teach judgment. The real development happens when someone challenges your thinking, shows you what you missed and helps you approach the problem differently next time. - Ryan Johnson, CallRail

Bring Them Closer To Customers

Put junior hires closer to customers, not further away from them. AI absorbs the routine production work that once filled early careers, so replace it with support rotations, user interviews and sales-call shadowing. Judgment is knowing why something matters, and that comes from watching real people struggle with what you built. - Mudit Singh, TestMu AI (LambdaTest)

Build AI-Supported Apprenticeships

This topic is a genuine concern in the accounting and finance professions, where judgment is paramount. Automating entry-level work removes the experiences in which professional judgment is built. Junior roles should be redesigned as AI-supported apprenticeships: Let AI accelerate the work, but require young professionals to question the output, explain the reasoning and learn directly from experienced colleagues. AI is great at the “what” but not always at the “why,” and context matters. - Kacee Johnson, radical

Teach Them To Supervise AI

Junior roles should be redesigned around decision-making rather than execution. Companies should give early-career employees opportunities to validate AI-generated recommendations, challenge assumptions, interpret context and assess business trade-offs. By acting as “AI supervisors,” junior talent can develop critical thinking, judgment and domain expertise, ensuring they build the skills needed for future leadership roles. - Nalini Garg, Deloitte

Give Them Ambiguous Problems To Solve

Assign junior team members to problems where the requirements are genuinely unclear and the right answer isn’t known in advance. Most entry-level work involves executing against defined specs, which builds skill but not judgment. Judgment develops when someone has to determine what the problem actually is before solving it. Structured ambiguity, with a senior debriefing the reasoning afterward, builds what output-focused roles never develop. - Dan Haiem, AppMakers USA

Have Them Fix Real Production Bugs

Make them fix production bugs in code they did not write. Judgment is not built by evaluating AI output—it is built by tracing a failure through a system you did not design and barely understand. We put juniors on real incidents in unfamiliar codebases early. Nothing teaches how software fails like debugging with a client waiting. Reviewing AI drafts teaches taste. Inheriting a mess teaches judgment. - Dennis Vorobyov, EltexSoft

Teach Them What ‘Good’ Looks Like

Good judgment comes from exposure to experience. The role of AI is to accelerate human output, so leaders should prioritize ensuring that junior roles not only accelerate how they produce (using AI) but also deepen their understanding of the outcome and impact of the role. Simply put—train employees in what “good” looks like, and not just how to produce “more.” - Geoff Webb, Conga

Teach Them When To Trust AI

All companies should be treating AI as a part of junior employees’ training, not just another tool in their stack they need to learn how to use. Instead of assuming new hires can evaluate AI recommendations, organizations should put them through exercises on when to trust the output, when to question it and how to apply it directly into their setting. That’s how you build judgment instead of just increasing productivity. - Todd Fisher, CTM

Keep Them In Real-World Work

Keep juniors in real work, even when AI can produce the first output. Make them responsible for testing it against the customer, context or moment and explaining what they would change. That preserves the apprenticeship path by giving them repeated practice in determining when AI is technically right but wrong for the situation. - Panos Siozos, LearnWorlds

Build Ethical Impact Reviews Into Their Work

As AI automates more entry-level output, juniors should learn to assess who may be harmed, excluded or misled by a product decision. Ask them to review privacy, bias, accessibility, safety and user trust risks before launch. This helps them connect design and engineering choices to real consequences, builds stronger judgment, and teaches that responsible technology must be useful, fair, safe and trusted. - Salice Thomas, Wipro Limited