Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Distribution and bathymetric zonation of shell-boring endoliths in recent reef and shelf environments: Cozumel, Yucatan (Mexico)

Verteilung und Tiefenzonierung von schalenbohrenden Endolithen in rezenten Riff- und Schelfbereichen: Cozumel, Yucatán (Mexiko)

  • Published:
View saved research
Image Facies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pelecypod shells from bottom sediments of the shelf and upper slope off Cozumel (Mexico), at depths ranging from 1 to 47 m, were studied with regard to the taxonomy, frequency and distribution of microborings produced by endolithic organisms. Scanning electron microscopy of plastic casts of the borings reveals the existence of 29 microboring types, distinguished on the base of shape, size, mode of branching, overall boring pattern and sporangia. The endoliths include cyanobacteria, chlorophycean algae, rhodophycean algae, fungi, sponges and several microborers of uncertain taxonomic affinities.

Although most of the borings exhibit a wide bathymetrical range, a subdivision of the photic zone is indicated by the abundance and vertical distribution of some species. The upper part of the photic zone (1–30 m) is characterized by higher species diversity, by the green algaePhaeophila engleri andEntocladia testarum, and by the abundance of the cyanobacteriaHyella gigas. Fungi occur at all depths but are more common in the lower photic zone (30–47 m). The bathymetrical position of the boundary might be influenced by the vertical sampling distance. Generally, there is a good agreement with other bathymetrical patterns of recent endoliths, especially with those from the Puerto Rican carbonate shelf.

There is no distinct difference in the frequency or taxonomic composition of shell-boring endoliths from reefs and interreef areas (platforms covered by bioclastic sands). Boring intensity, measured by point-counting of SEM photographs, is generally high; in 58% of the samples 60 to 99% of the outer shell surface is bored, predominantly by fungi and by the green algaPhaeophila engleri. Mean boring intensities show no relationship with water depths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Receive 10 units per month
  • Download 1 article/chapter for 1 unit
  • Get selected eBooks for 7 units
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Akpan, E.B. &Farrow, G.E. (1984): Shell-boring algae on the Scottish continental shelf: identification, distribution, bathymetric zonation.—Transact. Royal Scottish Soc. Edinburgh, Earth Sci.,75, 1–12, 14 Figs., Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst, R.G.C. (1966): Boring algae, micrite envelopes and lithification of molluscan biosparites.—Geol. J.,5, 15–32, 3 Pls., 1 Fig., Liverpool

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekschoten, J.G. (1966): Shell borings of sessile epibiontic organisms as palaeoecological guides (with examples from the Dutch coast).—Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology,2, 333–379, 16 Figs., Amsterdam

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, R.G. (1970): Borings as trace fossils andEntobia cretacea Portlock as an example.—In:Crimes, T.P. & Harper, J.C. (eds.): Trace Fossils, Geol. J., Spec. Issue,3, 49–90, 5 Pls., 15 Figs., London

  • Bromley, R.G. &D'Alessandro, A. (1984): The ichnogenusEntobia from the Miocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene of Southern Italy.—Riv. Ital. Paleont. Strat.,90/2, 227–296, 14 Pls., Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, D.A. &Perkins, R.D. (1980): Bathymetric zonation and paleoecological significance of microborings in Puerto Rican shelf and slope sediments.—J. Sed. Petrol.,50/3, 881–904, 9 Figs., Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S.E. (1980):Paleoconchocelis starmachii, a carbonate boring microfossil from the Upper Silurian of Poland (425 million years old): Implications of the Bangiaceae (Rhodophyta).—Phycologia,19/1, 25–36, 1 Pl., 17 Figs., Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S.E. (1983): The modern distribution and geological history of calcium carbonate boring microorganisms.—In:Westbroek, P. & de Jong, E. W. (eds.): Biomineralisation and Biological Metal Accumulation, 4th Int. Symp. Biomin., 29–104, 2 Pls., 12 Figs.

  • Campbell, S.E. &Cole, K. (1984): Developmental studies on cultured endolithicConchocelis (Rhodophyta).—Hydrobiologia,116/117, 201–208, 2 Pls., 14 Figs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavaliere, A.C. &Randall, S.A. (1970): Fungi on animal shell fragments.—J. Elisa Mitchell Sci. Soc.,86/4, 203–206, 13 Figs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, K.M. (1949):Conchocelis-phase in life-history ofPorphyra umbilicalis (L.) Kütz.—Nature,164, 748–749, 2 Figs., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsik, W.C. (1971): Microbiological degradation of sporopollenin.—In:Brooks, J., Grant, P.R., Muir, M., vanGijzel, P. & Shae, G. (eds.): Sporopollenin, 480–509

  • Edwards, B.D. &Perkins, R.D. (1974): Distribution of microborings within continental marin sediments of southeastern United States.—J. Sed. Petrol.,44/4, 1122–1135, 12 Figs., Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekdale, A.A., Bromley, R.G. & Pemberton, S.G. (1984): Ichnology: The use of trace fossils in sedimentology and stratigraphy.—Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., Short Course,15, 317 p., Tulsa

  • Folk, R.L. &Robles, R. (1964): Carbonate sands of Isla Perez, Alacran Reef Complex, Yucatan.—J. Geol.,72/3, 255–292, 4 Pls., Chicago

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredj, G. &Falconetti, C. (1977): Sur la présence d'Algues filamenteuses perforantes dans le test desGryphus vitreus (Born) (Brachiopodes, Térébratulidès) de la limite inférieure du plateau continental méditerranéen.—C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris,284, Ser. D, 1167–1170, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Fremy, P. (1945): Contribution à la physiologie des Thallophytes marins perforant et cariant les roches calcaires et les coquilles. —Ann. Inst. Océanogr.,22, 107, Monaco

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, G.M., Gebelein, C.D. &Sanders, J.E. (1971): Micritic envelopes of carbonate grains are not exclusively of photosynthetic algal origin.—Sedimentology,16, 89–96, Amsterdam

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaub, I. (1988): Mikrobohrspuren in verschiedenen Faziesbereichen des Oberjura Westeuropas (Vorläufige Mitteilung).—N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,177/1, 135–164, 4 Figs., Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubć, S. (1969): Distribution, taxonomy and boring patterns of marine endolithic algae.—Amer. Zoologist,9, 747–751, 6 Figs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubć, S. (1972): Scanning electron microscopy of recent boring Cyanophyta and its possible paleontological application.—In:Desinkachary, T.V. (ed.): Taxonomy and biology of Blue-Green Algae, 167–170, University of Madras

  • Golubić, S., Brent, G. &LeCampion-Alsumard, T. (1970): Scanning electron microscopy of endolithic algae and fungi using multipurpose casting-embedding technique.—Lethaia,3, 203–209, 5 Figs., Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubić, S., Campbell, S.E., Drobne, K., Cameron, B., Balsam, W.C., Cimerman, F. &Dubois, L. (1984): Microbial endoliths: A benthic overprint in the sedimentary record and a paleobathymetrical crossreference with foraminifera.—J. Paleont.,58/2, 351–361, 5 Pls., Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubić, S., Campbell, S.E. &Spaeth, C. (1983): Kunstharzausgüsse fossiler Mikroben-Bohrgänge.—Der Präparator,29, 197–200, 2 Figs., Bochum

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubić, S. &LeCampion-Alsumard, T. (1973): Boring behavior of marine blue-green algaMastigocoleus testarum Lagerheim andKyrthuthrix dalmatica Ercegovic, as a taxonomic character.—Schweiz. Z. Hydrologie,35, 157–161, 2 Figs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golubić, S., Perkins, R.D. &Lukas, K.J. (1975): Boring microorganisms and microborings in carbonate substrates.—In:Frey, R.D. (ed.): The Study of Trace Fossils, 229–259, 21 Figs., New York (Springer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goreau, T.F. & Hartman, W.D. (1963): Boring sponges as controlling factors in the formation and maintenance of coral reefs.—In:Sognnaes, R.F. (ed.): Mechanisms of hard tissue destruction, Amer. Ass. Adv. Sci., Publ.,75, 25–54.

  • Harris, P.M., Halley, R.B. &Lukas, K.J. (1979): Endolithic microborings and their preservation in Holocene-Pleistocene (Bahama-Florida) ooids.—Geology,7, 216–22, 4 Figs., Boulder

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, B.W. (1983): Excavation patterns and spiculae dimension of the boring spongeCliona celata from the SW-Netherlands.—Senck. maritima,15, 55–83, 5 Pls., 6 Figs., Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhnk, W. (1969): Über den pilzlichen Befall kalkiger Hartteile von Meerestieren.—Ber. deutsch. Wiss. Komm. Meeresforschung,20/2, 129–140, 5 Figs., Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E.J. (1985): Distribution patterns of recent microbial endoliths in the intertidal and supratidal zones, Bermuda.—Soc. Econ. Paleont. Min., 179–194, 5 Figs., Tulsa

  • Hook, J.E., Golubić, S. &Milliman, J.D. (1984): Micritic cement in microborings is not necessarily a shallow-water indicator.—J. Sed. Petrol.,54/2, 425–431, 12 Figs., Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, P.A. (1986): Biological destruction of coral reefs.—Coral Reef,4, 239–253, Berlin

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobluk, D.R. &Kahle, C.F. (1978): Geological significance of boring and cave-dwelling marine algae.—Bull. Canadian Petrol. Geol.,26, 362–379, Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmeyer, J. (1969): The role of marine fungi in the penetration of calcareous substances.—Amer. Zoologist,9, 741–746, 5 Figs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornmann, P. (1959): Die heterogene GattungGamontia: 1. Der sporangiale Anteil,Codiolum polyrhizum.—Helgoländer Wiss. Meeresuntersuchungen,6/3, 229–259, 9 Figs., List

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1960a): Die heterogene GattungGamontia: 2. Der fädige Anteil,Eugomontia sacculata nov. gen. nov. spec.—Helgoländer Wiss. Untersuchungen,7, 59–61, 8 Figs

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1960b): VonConchocelis zuPorphyra.—Helgoländer Wiss. Meeresuntersuchungen,7, 189–193, 5 Figs., List

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1961): Zur Kenntnis derPorphyra-Arten in Helgoland.—Helgoländer Wiss. Untersuchungen,8, 176–192, 12 Figs., List

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kylin, H. (1935): Über einige kalkbohrende Chlorophyceen.—Kungl. Fysiogr. Sällskapets, Lund Förhandl.,5/19, 186–204, 7 Figs., Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCampion-Alsumard, T. (1978): Les Cyanophycées endolithes marines. Systématique, ultrastructure, écologie et biodestruction.—Thèse Univ. Aix-Marseille II,1, 198 p., Marseille

  • — (1979): Les Cyanophycées endolithes marines. Systematique, ultrastructure, écologie et biodestruction.—Oceanologica Acta,2/2, 143–156, 4 Figs.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCampion, T., Campbell, S.E. &Golubć, S. (1982): Endoliths and the depth of the photic zone—discussion.—J. Sed. Petrol.,52, 1333, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCampion-Alsumard, T. &Golubć, S. (1985a): Ecological and taxonomic relationships between endolithic cyanophytesHormatonema andSolentia.—Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 71/1–2, 115–118, 6 Figs., Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • — & — (1985):Hyella caespitosa Bornet & Flahault andHyella balani Lehman (Pleurocapsales, Cyanophyta: a comparative study.—Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 71/1, 2, 119–148, 34 Figs., Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, K.J. (1974): Two species of the chlorophyt genusOstreobium from skeletons of Atlantic and Carribean reef corals.—J. Phycol.,19, 331–335, 9 Pls.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1979): The effect of marine microphytes on carbonate substrates.—Scanning Electron Microscopy,11, 447–456, 3 Figs., O'Hare, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, K.J. &Golubć, S. (1981): New endolithic Cyanophytes from the North Atlantic Ocean. 1.Cyanosaccus pyriformis gen. et sp. nov.—J. Phycol., 17, 224–229, 13 Figs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — & — (1983): New endolithic Cyanophytes from the North Atlantic. 2.Hyella gigas Lukas and Golubić sp. nov. from the Florida continental margin.—J. Phycol.,19, 129–136, 8 Figs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, K.J. &Hoffmann, E.J. (1984): New endolithic Cyanophytes from the North Atlantic Ocean. 3.Hyella pyxis Lukas and Hoffman spec. nov.—J. Phycol., 20, 515–520, 3 Pls., 8 Figs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mädgefrau, K. (1936): Lebensspuren fossiler “Bohr”-Organismen.—Beitr. naturkundl. Forsch. Südwestdeutschland,1/1–2, 54–61, 6 Pls., 50 Figs., Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J.A., McIntyre, I.G. &Perkins, R.D. (1982): Distribution of microborers within planted substrates along a barrier reef transect, Carrie Bow Cay, Belize.—Smithsonian Contrib. Marine Sci.,12, 93–107, 5 Pls., 24 Figs., Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J.A. &Perkins, R.D. (1979): Endolithic infestation of carbonate substrates below the sediment-water interface.—J. Sed. Petrol.,49/2, 357–378, 4 Plas., 14 Figs., Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Muckelbauer, G. (1989): Der Schelf von Cozumel, Mexico—Topographie, Organismen und Sediment.—Diss. Naturwiss. Fak. Univ. Erlangen-Nürnberg, 228 p., 17 Pls., 52 Figs., Erlangen

  • Nielsen, R. (1972): A study of shell-boring marine algae around the Danish Island Lase.—Botan. Tidsskr.,67, 245–269, 5 Figs., Kopenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1979): Culture studies on the type species ofAcrochaete, Bolbocoleon andEntocladia (Chaetophoraceae, Chlorophyceae).—Botan. Notisier,132, 441–449, 3 Figs., Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottmann, S. (1989): Systematik und Verbreitungsmuster der Bivalvenfauna aus dem Flachwasserschelf vor Cozumel, Mexico.—Diplomarb. Inst. Paläont. Univ. Erlangen-Nürnberg, 130 p., 14 Pls., 34 Figs., Erlangen

  • Perkins, R.D. &Tsentas, C.J. (1976): Microbial infestation of carbonate substrates planted on the St. Croix shelf, West Indies. —Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull.,87, 1615–1628, 6 Pls., 46 Figs., New York

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risk, M.J. &McGeachy, J.K. (1978): Aspects of bioerosion of modern Carribean reefs.—Rev. Biol. Trop.,26, Suppl., 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, W.S. &Perkins, R.D. (1972): Distribution and geological significance of microboring organisms within sediments of the Arlington Reef Complex, Australia.—Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull.,83, 1139–1150, 16 Figs., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rützler, K. &Rieger, G. (1973): Sponge burrowing: Fine structure ofCliona lampa penetrating calcareous substrates.—Marine Biol., 21, 144–162, 11 Figs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. (1976): Biological and inorganic factors in the destruction of limestone coasts.—Contrib. Sed.,6, 112 p., Stuttgart

  • — (1977): Carbonate construction and decomposition by epilithic and endolithic microorganisms in salt- and freshwater.—In:Flügel, E. (ed.): Fossil algae, recent results and developments, 248–260, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (Springer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. &Torunski, H. (1983): Biokarst on Limestone Coasts, Morphogenesis and Sediment Production.—Marine Ecology,4/1, 45–63, 11 Figs., Berlin-Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinchatt, J.P. (1965): Significance of constituent composition, texture and skeletal breakdown in some recent carbonate sediments.—J. Sed. Petrol.,35, 71–90, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, K., Golubić, S. &Brett, C.E. (1987): Endolith associations and their relation to facies distribution in the Middle Devonian of New York State, U.S.A..—Lethaia,20, 263–290, 14 Figs., Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Warne, J.E. (1977): Carbonate Borers—Their Role in Reef Ecology and Preservation.—In:Frost, S.H., Weiss, M.P. & Saunders, J.B. (eds.): Reefs and related carbonates-ecology and sedimentology. AAPG Stud. Geol., 4, 261–279, 9 Figs., Tulsa

  • Wilkinson, M. &Burrow, E.M. (1972):Eugomontia sacculata Kommann in Britain and North America.—Brit. Phycol. J.,5/2, 235–238, 3 Figs., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zebrowski, G. (1937): New genera of Cladochystinaceae.—Ann. Missouri Botan. Garden,23, 553–564, 1 Pl., St. Louis

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeff, M.L. &Perkins, R.D. (1979): Microbial alteration of Bahamian deep-sea carbonates.—Sedimentology,26, 175–201, 19 Figs., Amsterdam

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Naturhistorisches Museum, Pöckelstraße 4, D-3300, Braunschweig

    Astrid Günther

Authors
  1. Astrid Günther
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Günther, A. Distribution and bathymetric zonation of shell-boring endoliths in recent reef and shelf environments: Cozumel, Yucatan (Mexico). Facies 22, 233–261 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02536953

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02536953

Keywords