Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Assessing genetic contributions to phenotypic differences among 'racial' and 'ethnic' groups

Abstract

Descriptions of human genetic variation given thirty years ago have held up well, considering the substantial accrual of DNA sequence data in the interim. Most importantly, estimates of between-group genetic variation have remained relatively low. Despite the low average level of between-group variation, clusters recently inferred from multilocus genetic data coincide closely with groups defined by self-identified race or continental ancestry. This correspondence implies that genetic factors might contribute to unexplained between-group phenotypic variation. Current understanding of the contribution of genes to variation in most complex traits is limited, however. Under these circumstances, assumptions about genetic contributions to group differences are unfounded. In the absence of detailed understanding, 'racial' and 'ethnic' categories will remain useful in biomedical research. Further, we suggest approaches and guidelines for assessing the contribution of genetic factors to between-group phenotypic differences, including studies of candidate genes and analyses of recently admixed populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Two examples of group differences influenced by environmental or genetic factors.
Image

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bodmer, W.F. & Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. Intelligence and race. Sci. Am. 223, 19–29 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dobzhansky, T. Race equality. in The Biological and Social Meaning of Race (ed. Osborne, R.) 14–24 (Freeman, San Francisco, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. & Bodmer, W.F. The Genetics of Human Populations (Freeman, San Francisco, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lewontin, R. The apportionment of human diversity. in Evolutionary Biology vol. 6 (eds. Hecht, M.K. & Steere, W.S.) (Plenum, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Howells, W.W. The meaning of race. in The Biological and Social Meaning of Race (ed. Osborne, R.) (Freeman, San Francisco, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. McKusick, V.A. The ethnic distribution of disease in the United States. J. Chronic Dis. 20, 115–118 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Graves, J. Race Myth: Why We Pretend Race Exists in America (Dutton, New York, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holden, C. Peering under the hood of Africa's runners. Science 305, 637–639 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwartz, R.S. Racial profiling in medical research. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 1392–1393 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Entine, J. & Smith, E. Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We're Afraid to Talk About It (Public Affairs, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sarich, V. & Miele, F. Race: The Reality of Human Differences (Westview, Boulder, 2004).

  12. Olson, S. Mapping Human History (Mariner Books, Boston, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Long, J.C. & Kittles, R.A. Human genetic diversity and the nonexistence of biological races. Hum. Biol. 75, 449–471 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parrott, R.L., Silk, K.J. & Condit, C. Diversity in lay perceptions of the sources of human traits: genes, environments, and personal behaviors. Soc. Sci. Med. 56, 1099–1109 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sankar, P. et al. Genetic research and health disparities. JAMA 291, 2985–2989 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bamshad, M., Wooding, S., Salisbury, B.A. & Stephens, J.C. Deconstructing the relationship between genetics and race. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 598–609 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lander, E.S. Cracking the code of life. (WGBH, Boston, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haga, S.B. & Venter, J.C. Genetics. FDA races in the wrong direction. Science 301, 466 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Risch, N., Burchard, E., Ziv, E. & Tang, H. Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease. Genome Biol. 3, comment2007 (2002).

  20. Feldman, M.W. & Lewontin, R.C. The heritability hang-up. Science 190, 1163–1168 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Baharloo, S., Johnston, P.A., Service, S.K., Gitschier, J. & Freimer, N.B. Absolute pitch: an approach for identification of genetic and nongenetic components. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 224–231 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gregersen, P.K., Kowalsky, E., Kohn, N. & Marvin, E.W. Absolute pitch: prevalence, ethnic variation, and estimation of the genetic component. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 911–913 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Farrer, L.A. et al. Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium. JAMA 278, 1349–1356 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Penrose, L.S. Measurement of pleiotropic effects in phenylketonuria. Ann. Eugen. 16, 134–141 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barbujani, G., Magagni, A., Minch, E. & Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. An apportionment of human DNA diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4516–4519 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Seielstad, M.T., Minch, E. & Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. Genetic evidence for a higher female migration rate in humans. Nat. Genet. 20, 278–280 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenberg, N.A. et al. Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298, 2381–2385 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jorde, L.B. et al. The distribution of human genetic diversity: a comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal, and Y-chromosome data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 979–988 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bowcock, A.M. et al. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368, 455–457 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mountain, J.L. & Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. Multilocus genotypes, a tree of individuals, and human evolutionary history. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 705–718 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bamshad, M.J. et al. Human population genetic structure and inference of group membership. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 578–589 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Edwards, A.W. Human genetic diversity: Lewontin's fallacy. Bioessays 25, 798–801 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McKusick-Nathans. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM (TM). vol. 2004 (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 2000).

  34. Evans, W.E. & Relling, M.V. Pharmacogenomics: translating functional genomics into rational therapeutics. Science 286, 487–491 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Evans, W.E. & Relling, M.V. Moving towards individualized medicine with pharmacogenomics. Nature 429, 464–468 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson, J.F. et al. Population genetic structure of variable drug response. Nat. Genet. 29, 265–269 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Goldstein, D.B. & Chikhi, L. Human migrations and population structure: what we know and why it matters. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 3, 129–152 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Beaumont, M.A. & Nichols, R.A. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 263, 1619–1626 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Akey, J.M., Zhang, G., Zhang, K., Jin, L. & Shriver, M.D. Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Res. 12, 1805–1814 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bowcock, A.M. et al. Drift, admixture, and selection in human evolution: a study with DNA polymorphisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 839–843 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hamblin, M.T., Thompson, E.E. & Di Rienzo, A. Complex signatures of natural selection at the Duffy blood group locus. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 369–383 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Croucher, P.J. et al. Haplotype structure and association to Crohn's disease of CARD15 mutations in two ethnically divergent populations. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 11, 6–16 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Limdi, J.K. & Crampton, J.R. Hereditary haemochromatosis. Q. J. Med. 97, 315–324 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Su, B. et al. Distribution of three HIV-1 resistance-conferring polymorphisms (SDF1-3′A, CCR2-641, and CCR5-delta32) in global populations. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 8, 975–979 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Harding, R.M. et al. Evidence for variable selective pressures at MC1R. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 1351–1361 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Fitch, K.R. et al. Genetics of dark skin in mice. Genes Dev. 17, 214–228 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kennedy, J.L., Farrer, L.A., Andreasen, N.C., Mayeux, R. & St George-Hyslop, P. The genetics of adult-onset neuropsychiatric disease: complexities and conundra? Science 302, 822–826 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Brant, S.R. & Shugart, Y.Y. Inflammatory bowel disease gene hunting by linkage analysis: rationale, methodology, and present status of the field. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 10, 300–311 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Botstein, D. & Risch, N. Discovering genotypes underlying human phenotypes: past successes for mendelian disease, future approaches for complex disease. Nat. Genet. 33 Suppl, 228–237 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Benjamin, J. et al. Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking. Nat. Genet. 12, 81–4 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ebstein, R.P. et al. Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Nat. Genet. 12, 78–80 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kluger, A.N., Siegfried, Z. & Ebstein, R.P. A meta-analysis of the association between DRD4 polymorphism and novelty seeking. Mol. Psychiatry 7, 712–717 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Burchard, E.G. et al. The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1170–1175 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Karter, A.J. Commentary: Race, genetics, and disease—in search of a middle ground. Int. J. Epidemiol. 32, 26–28 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lin, S.S. & Kelsey, J.L. Use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research: concepts, methodological issues, and suggestions for research. Epidemiol. Rev. 22, 187–202 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim, U.K. et al. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 299, 1221–1225 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna L Mountain.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mountain, J., Risch, N. Assessing genetic contributions to phenotypic differences among 'racial' and 'ethnic' groups. Nat Genet 36 (Suppl 11), S48–S53 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1456

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1456

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing