Skip to main content

Abstract

Post-Keynesian economics is only one of many heterodox schools of thought. Within this heterodox label, of which most members are clearly opposed to neoclassical economics, we find Marxists, Sraffians (also called the neo-Ricardians), neo-Structuralists (on development issues), Institutionalists, the French Regulation School, Humanistic or Social economists, ehaviourists, Schumpeterians (also called Evolutionists), Feminist economists, and more.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - view details
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - view details

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 Marc Lavoie

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lavoie, M. (2006). Post-Keynesian Heterodoxy. In: Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230626300_1

Download citation

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Publish with us

Policies and ethics