You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 12, 2025. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 12, 2025. It is now read-only.
How might the browser detect abusive usage of the API to keep the topic dissemination rate in line with expectations? #5
One option would be to require each calling domain to obtain a signature from a known organization, and maintain a public repository of signers and their policies for any key shipped with the browser. If a caller violates the policy and uses Topics API for malicious or non-ad purposes, any keys used to sign it could be dropped from the browser. (This is based on the First-Party Sets proposal) (#87)
Activity
igrigorik commentedon Feb 9, 2022
Existing proposal already imposes an upper-bound rate limit...
Is the intent to explore how to reduce "15 topics per epoch" even further? What are some example scenarios?
dmarti commentedon Oct 14, 2022
One option would be to require each calling domain to obtain a signature from a known organization, and maintain a public repository of signers and their policies for any key shipped with the browser. If a caller violates the policy and uses Topics API for malicious or non-ad purposes, any keys used to sign it could be dropped from the browser. (This is based on the First-Party Sets proposal) (#87)
duaneking commentedon Jan 17, 2025
How are you going to protect against historical data being archived an used to track over time without informed consent?