Fair Trials and International Courts: A Critical Evaluation of the Nuremberg Legacy

Criminal Justice Ethics 28 (1):5-24 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The novelties of the contemporary international order require a rethinking of the normative foundations of criminal justice. Although one can understand the relevance of basic principles such as th...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/07311290902831268

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 147,835

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Creative actualization: a meliorist theory of values.Hugh P. McDonald (ed.) - 2011 - New York: Rodopi.
The Research Misconception.Maurie Markman - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):241-252.
Response to “Dubious Premises— Evil Conclusions: Moral Reasoning at the Nuremberg Trials” by Edmund D. Pellegrino and David C. Thomasma (CQ Vol 9, No 2). [REVIEW]Michael L. Gross - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):99-102.
Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent.Jane L. Hutton & Richard E. Ashcroft - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (1):41-53.
Dubious Premises—Evil Conclusions: Moral Reasoning at the Nuremberg Trials.Edmund D. Pellegrino & David C. Thomasma - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (2):261-274.
Neo-fascist legal theory on trial: An interpretation of Carl Schmitt's defence at nuremberg from the perspective of Franz Neumann's critical theory of law.Michael Salter - 1999 - Res Publica 5 (2):161-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
225 (#186,036)

6 months
21 (#334,764)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references