The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20130806042059/http://veronicarothbooks.blogspot.com/2010_06_01_archive.html

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Like A Party In Your Brain: World-Building

Today the scary ogre of a topic that is on my mind is world-building.

For those of you who don't know the lingo, world-building is essentially creating an authentic and convincing environment for your characters. If you're a writer, you have to build a world no matter what you're writing, even if it's set in modern-day wherevertown. You have to decide where your story takes place and what that setting is like and what impact it has on your characters. But for obvious reasons, world-building gets a lot more complicated when you don't set your book in modern day wherevertown, which is why I think a lot of contemporary writers hesitate to try speculative fiction (IE: dystopian, sci-fi, fantasy, etc.), and why a lot of speculative writers spend time bashing their heads against solid objects at one point or another.

I'm going to say something that will make you want to flick me in the eye, probably: even though I've been writing speculative fiction since I was an angsty pre-teen with bracelets made of safety pins, I've never thought about this before. I never evaluated whether I was good at world-building or not, or how to go about it, I just did the best I could and with DIVERGENT it seemed to turn out just fine, although there was (and still is) room for improvement.

So this is my attempt to figure out how it works, or at least, how it worked for me.

It starts...with a concept. A notion. A thought. Whatever it is about your attempted world that made you want to set your story there, or that inspired your story, and so on. For the purposes of this example: what if there was a world populated entirely by marshmallow people?

What are the implications of that concept/notion/thought? How does that concept affect the rest of the world? For example: the marshmallow people would probably live in fear of rain, because it would melt them into little piles of marshmallow goo. Likewise, they wouldn't take showers and they wouldn't drink water or go swimming.

Wait-- if they don't drink water, what exactly do they live on? What fuels a marshmallow person's survival? Clearly the answer is sugar. So the marshmallow people eat sugar, but how do they grow it? Do they have miles and miles of sugarcane fields? If so, the marshmallow-people farmers must be the daredevils of the marshmallow people world, because they constantly run the risk of getting caught in the rain, and in fact, derive their well-being from the consistency of rainfall.

In fact, those living within marshmallow people cities probably envelop themselves in as much rain protection as possible, possibly a large plastic dome, but the marshmallow farmers have to live outside the dome, and...

Okay, I'm going to stop, because that's probably getting annoying.

My point is this: whatever idea you have, there is a problem inherent in it that needs to be addressed and extrapolated from in order to create your world. Or, if your idea is itself a problem, you have a different set of questions to ask yourself. That's kind of how it works for me, with dystopian worlds. What's "the dystopian problem"? (IE: people forced to enter televised death match, people constantly monitored by Big Brother, people who aren't allowed to experience human emotion, et cetera) From what kind of people/society did that problem arise? What was the inciting incident that led to the formation of a dystopian society? And so on.

When you write yourself into a corner, and you probably will, let the world you've already created tell you how to write yourself back out of it again. As you build the world, you start to make rules for yourself, and those rules will dictate how the rest of the world is built. One of my professors used to say that you should let the story tell you how it should progress.

My advice is essentially: think about it. A lot. Think about things that never come into play in the plot of your book. Think about currency, morality, religion, food, holidays, government, units of measurement, customs, rituals, values, expectations, funerals, weddings, fashion, architecture, leisure activities. But most of all, whatever details you come up with, think about how they affect the world you've built. Or you can approach it in reverse-- think about the world you've come up with. There are hundreds of factors that contributed to creating that particular place in its particular situation. What are they?

I mean, if you're writing it, you probably enjoy thinking about it anyway. So this is fun. Yes, that's right. World-building = fun. Like a party in your brain.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

A Day In the Land of Divergent

Prior to my fountain-jumping extravaganza last week, I went on an architectural boat tour of Chicago, the one Senior Week activity I actually attended. The problem with living near a place for your entire life is that you rarely look at it, particularly with the fresh eyes that you need as a writer, and that's a problem I intended to correct. Color me a tourist.

DIVERGENT is set in Chicago, for those of you who don't know. More accurately, it's set in a futuristic, warped version of Chicago, because we are dealing with a dystopian book, yes? You would think that I didn't have to do a lot of research because I live so close to the city, but you would be wrong. I looked up SO MANY MAPS. And SO MANY PICTURES. And SO. MANY. BUILDING HEIGHTS. And of course, I went on this boat tour.

Shall we have a look? (No, I don't know why I ask questions in blog posts as if I expect to hear an answer.)

Image

This would be the north side skyline. That tall black tower is the Hancock Building, one of my favorites. You can't see it from that far away, but the base of the building is much wider than the top, so it kind of slopes upward-- very cool.

Image

And most of the south side skyline. You can kind of see the Sears Tower in the mist on the far left side of that picture. The tall, foggy building in the center is Trump Tower, and the green-roofed building on the right is the end of Navy Pier.

Image

Speaking of Navy Pier, that's the Ferris Wheel. I rode it once when I was young, but I think now I would pee my pants if I tried to go in it because it's so high up. Just so you know, my main character does not share my fear.

Image

Trump Tower. I sort of like this building, even though part of me is wary of it because it's new.

Image

The reflection of the Trump Tower in this other building that I forgot the name of.

Image

Merchandise Mart! I am pretty sure our tour guide told us that in terms of square footage, this is the largest building in the country. Or one of the largest. Basically, it's freaking huge.

Image

Ahh, the Sears Tower. Technically it's called the Willis Tower now, but no one I know calls it that. Not even the tour guide called it that. SEARS TOWER FOREVER.

Image

This is my friend Mary Katherine in front of the lion statue in front of the Art Institute of Chicago. You may not have heard, but the Chicago Blackhawks won the Stanley Cup this year, and we're all very excited about it. Hence the huge Blackhawks helmet on the lion's head.

Image

And of course, me and my fountain-jumping accomplices in front of the GIANT FACE, also known as one of the two pillar-fountains in Millenium Park. (I feel like I should probably explain my shirt, while I'm at it. I went to Carleton College my freshman year, and then transferred to Northwestern. My friend Alice, who went to Saint Olaf, the college across town from Carleton, got me the "CARLETON SUCKS" tee shirt because she thought it was funny. I agreed. But I do not actually think that Carleton sucks. It's a great place. Just wasn't for me.)

So there you have it. A short tour through Chicago, and by proxy, through some of the scenes in DIVERGENT. You'll see which ones in Summer 2011. YESSSS.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

MONTH ONE: Fear of Public Humiliation

There's one thing I didn't tell you guys about BEA.

While I was sitting at the table with all the awesome Harper people, I made a promise to myself. (And to them, really, because I did tell them my idea. Yesss.)

The last time I made this kind of promise, I ended up jumping into a bathtub of mini marshmallows. Just so you know.

This time, the promise was: I will perform one ridiculous act every month until the book comes out.

Why, you ask? Several reasons:

1. It's fun.

2. I have to occupy myself somehow, or I will go crazy with excitement.

3. I am not a bold or adventurous person. I never have been. I get nervous talking to strangers on the phone or ordering at restaurants I'm unfamiliar with. I refuse to ride rollercoasters or carnival rides. I have trouble killing spiders. Basically, I am nothing like the main character of DIVERGENT. She has to undergo several ordeals throughout the book that force her to face her fears, and her fears make my fears look insubstantial. Miniscule. Puny.

The more I think about it, the more I realize that I'd like to be a little more like her, in that respect. I'd like to tackle some of the little things that freak me out. They may not seem like much to some of you, but keep in mind that you are dealing with a very cautious and sensible and introverted person, here. I don't do wacky. (I know this sounds strange, coming from someone who jumped into a bathtub full of marshmallows, but that was WAY out of character for me.)

My hope is also that I can incorporate as much of Chicago as I can, because DIVERGENT is set there and I'd like to show you it.

And now, we come to this month, also known as Month #1.

There are these fountains in Millenium Park (one of the top tourist destinations in Chicago, involving a gelatinous-looking metal bean the size of a house, some great vegetation, some eateries, etc.) that are basically 50-foot pillars of LED screens depicting human faces. Every so often those faces spew a stream of water from their mouths.

I've always wanted to jump into a fountain.

But I'm afraid of doing anything that might draw attention to myself.

Hence this stunt.

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Shame: The Ultimate Time Vampire

I'm going to graduate soon, and I have a few things I want to say about reading + writing + school before I do.

First of all, I'd like to say that I understand what a blessing it is to be able to go to the kind of school I went to. I have gotten a lot out of it. The writing program was a great experience and I met a lot of incredible people, including some brilliant professors. I do not regret going here for a second.

This post is about the things I would rather not have learned, so it's going to seem very negative, but that isn't my intention. I'm just isolating one small aspect of my college experience that is certainly not unique to this school, because I think it's important that I talk about it.

(In this post I also talk about YA and commercial fiction like they're the same thing. I am aware that they aren't. I mean, obviously there's commercial fiction that isn't YA, and there is definitely YA that isn't commercial. But because the YA fiction I write just happens to be commercial, and because it's both the YA-ness and the commercial-ness that I've encountered difficulties with, I'll talk about them like they're the same.)

Okay, enough with the disclaimers.

The last time (excluding the past three months) that I remember loving to read was eighth grade. That's right: eight years ago. What happened, you ask? People told me I was too smart to read what I liked to read. They said I should be reading "college-level books." I started to feel ashamed of what I wanted to read, and I tried to read what I was "supposed" to be reading. But the problem was that I didn't enjoy those books, and I couldn't force myself to enjoy them, and I hated feeling like I was stupid for not liking them, so I stopped reading altogether.

When I got to college, I felt like I had to develop another identity, known as "Classroom Veronica." Classroom Veronica wasn't pretentious or obnoxious or anything, but when asked what her favorite books were, she didn't respond with complete honesty; she listed some adult literary fiction. Classroom Veronica can carry on an intelligent conversation about Anton Chekhov, Flannery O'Connor, Raymond Carver, and Ernest Hemingway, if she has to. If she has to, she can talk about literary fiction until it starts to come out of her ears.

And man, did I have to.

Okay: don't get me wrong. I do like literary fiction. I love Alice Munro and Marilynne Robinson and I even enjoyed Chekhov. Many writers of literary fiction have my admiration and respect. Classroom Veronica isn't a lie, but she is just a fragment of who I really am as a writer and as a reader.

Basically, I felt like the academic world was telling me that reading YA is a waste of time. And in a school environment that emphasizes productivity over happiness, "waste of time" is the most damaging label you can apply to something.

It wasn't just the reading. Earlier this year, I wrote that one of my professors insinuated in casual conversation that writing fantasy would be like a fun, easy vacation compared to "real writing." That opinion is a popular one in academic circles, at least in public, such that people will voice it as if it is common knowledge. It has become ingrained.

This is why I didn't tell many people at school that I was writing young adult fiction until this winter. One response I got when I did was "Oh, just trying to pay the bills?" As if commercial fiction and/or YA are just something "real" writers do to make money only so that they can afford to write adult literary fiction.

Let's not even talk about how silly and inaccurate that is from a practical standpoint. (I can hear all my YA-commercial writer friends saying "where exactly is this giant pool of cash that I get to fall into because I'm writing commercial YA?" There's a reason why I said my book deal was a blessing, not a wage.)

It's not just inaccurate; it's the exact opposite of the truth. There is absolutely nothing wrong with writing adult literary fiction, but for me, it felt forced and inauthentic. I was looking forward to the day when I didn't have to force it anymore.

Somewhere along the line, I started to feel ashamed, not just of my reading tastes, but of my writing.

Once the book deal was announced, though, no one cared what genre I was writing in. Actually, it felt like they chose to ignore it, even though the announcement said "young adult dystopian thriller." People at school keep asking me if DIVERGENT is something I wrote for school-- which is a perfectly legitimate question, but I always want to burst out laughing in response. No way would they have let me write DIVERGENT for school.

I crammed DIVERGENT into the spaces between my classes. I woke up early to work on it, and I stayed up late. I worked on it rather than doing homework or studying for tests. I wrote DIVERGENT concurrently with my senior thesis. And I wrote it isolated from my academic community.

What I recently realized, though, is that the real problem was not really with my school; it was with me.

I keep thinking about that quote by Eleanor Roosevelt-- No one can make you feel inferior without your consent. Certainly it would have been nice to feel the support of academia behind my writing. But ultimately, the responsibility is mine. I should have been convinced of the value of my work. I should have refused to allow anyone to put me down. I should have stood up for myself, my writing, and my genre. If I had, I'm sure I would have realized that fewer people would have judged me than I anticipated.

That's why I realized it was important to write this post. I know that some of you find yourselves in circles that look down on writing for young adults, or at least seem to be puzzled by it, or are for some reason convinced that it's easier or less important than writing for "grown ups." And some of you are much less confused than I was, and certainly bolder and more confident. But in case you aren't, some things you should know.

1. Your writing has worth. Particularly to your readers, who can pick up your book and escape difficult or stressful situations, or see through someone else's eyes, or think about something they have never considered before. Commercial YA can be both entertaining and challenging to your readers.

2. Writing commercial YA isn't easy. It carries a unique set of challenges, and addressing those challenges requires skill. Commercial YA, or any kind of commercial fiction, isn't something you have to graduate from in order to be a serious writer. It isn't training wheels. Seriously.

3. Don't let people make you ashamed of your writing. There is nothing to be ashamed of. One of the things I feel worst about was that I allowed myself to look down on the genre I love for so long. For the past few months I've been rediscovering how brilliant some YA books are, and I wish I had given myself a swift kick to the pants sooner.

Basically, I've realized that reading and writing YA wasn't a waste of my time, like some people suggested, and it wouldn't have been even if I hadn't gotten the book deal. Hiding it, though? That was a waste of time. I won't make that mistake again.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Image