The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20141224163754/http://www.dawn.com:80/news/731670/timeline-history-of-us-pakistan-relations

Timeline: History of US-Pakistan relations

Published Jul 04, 2012 03:43am

Prime Minister Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani, left, speaks as US President Barack Obama listens.—AP Photo
Prime Minister Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani, left, speaks as US President Barack Obama listens.—AP Photo

United States of America remains one of the first countries to have established diplomatic ties with Pakistan. Although the relationship dates back to October 20, 1947, it can be extrapolated that the relations have been based strictly on military and economic support.

During the initial years of Pakistan, the country had the options of building allegiance with Soviet Union or United States, however, Pakistan opted for the latter.

Image
1950-1953: Pakistan’s first prime minister, Liaquat Ali Khan visited United States to meet president Harry S Truman. It is alleged that during PM Khan’s first visit to US, president Truman requested Pakistan’s premier to let the CIA formulate a base in Pakistan, strictly to keep an eye on the activities of Soviet Union—a request which was not granted by Khan.

Throughout the course of these years many officials from Pakistan such as commander-in-chief Ayub Khan, foreign minister Zafrullah Khan, foreign secretary Ikramullah, finance minister Ghulam Muhammad, defence secretary Sikander Mirza and special envoy Mir Laiq Ali visited US, aiming to receive financial aids from the country.

1954: Pakistan signed Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement with the United States in May. Under the agreement, many Pakistani soldiers went to United States for training whereas US also established a Military Assistance Advisory Group (Maag) in Rawalpindi.

1956: President Dwight Eisenhower requested prime minister Suhrawardy to lease Peshawar Air Station to the American Army for keeping an eye on soviet Union and its ballistic missile programme. The request was granted by the prime minister.

Image
1960s: During the decade, the pro-American sentiments in Western side of Pakistan were at an all time high. However, the military and financial assistance was directed more towards West Pakistan, which caused an uproar and feeling of distrust in East Pakistan.

Ayub Khan allowed United States to fly spy mission to Soviet Union from Pakistan’s territory and accompanied by his daughter visited United States of America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7HwKD3XGUU

United States increased the amount of aid Pakistan was designated to receive from the consortium of Pakistan, half a billion dollars of which were lost in 1965’s Indo-Pakistan war—war staged to cause a rebel in Indian occupied Kashmir. The war also led US to place economical and military embargoes on Pakistan, which resulted in an economic collapse.

1971-1974: Being an important ally for US during the cold war, United States supported Pakistan, despite the arms embargo. Pakistan also assisted president Richard Nixon in making his first visit to Peoples’ Republic of China.

During 1971’s war, US is speculated to have provided Pakistan with arms and military aid, in order to discourage India from penetrating further into the cities of Pakistan because losing Pakistan meant losing an important ally in the soviet war.

Image
Moreover, as per the elections result, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was elected as the president of Pakistan and later on became the prime minister in 1974.

Although Bhutto was considered a socialist, he was a close and respected friend of president Nixon, which went in Pakistan’s favour.

1976-1979: President Jimmy Carter, an anti-socialist, won the presidential election of US and announced to seek a ban on nuclear weapons.

Bhutto lost the favours he enjoyed whilst Nixon was US president as Carter did not appreciate his policies and tightened already placed embargoes on Pakistan. However, Bhutto managed to procure items to enhance his atomic bomb project. President Carter and his administration allegedly threatened Bhutto to disrupt the process of atomic proliferation and research to which the latter did not agree, leading to his differences with the Americans.

1979-1988: During Zia ul Haq’s regime, Pakistan and United States enjoyed a warm and congenial relationship, which was primarily based on military ties and advancements. During the decade, US, along with CIA and ISI, launched billions of dollars worth of operations to prevent Soviet forces from further advancing into the region.

Image
It is during this period that United States granted billions of dollars to Pakistan in the name of military and economical aid. By the year 1981, Pakistan was discussing a $3.2-billion aid package with United States and in 1987 Pakistan became the second largest recipient of aid after Israel.

However, by the end of General Zia’s regime, Congress adopted Pressler amendment. The amendment banned major military and economical aid to Pakistan unless the state was able to justify and provide sufficient evidence that the funds are not being used for nuclear proliferation.

However it is alleged that although Pakistan disclosed that it could enrich uranium and assemble a nuclear device in 1984 and 1987 respectively, the sanctions were not imposed till 1990.

1990: US, under the Pressler amendment, imposed sanctions on Pakistan, as the country by then had lost its strategic importance in soviet war.

1992: The relations between US and Pakistan plummeted further when US ambassador Nicholas Platt, warned Pakistan of being included into state sponsors of terrorism list, in case it continued to support militants causing trouble in India.

Image
1995: Benazir Bhutto visited United States and requested president Bill Clinton to lift the embargoes on Pakistan and launch a joint operation to eradicate militancy from the region. As a reaction to Bhutto’s proposal, Brown amendment, which provided for the delivery of $368 million of military equipment purchased but not received by Pakistan before the imposition of Pressler amendment sanctions in 1990, was passed; however, the sanctions on arms were not lifted.

1998: Prime minister Nawaz Sharif conducted nuclear test in Balochistan, in retaliation to similar tests conducted by India, which invited the wrath of Clinton’s administration on both the countries. President Clinton imposed sanctions under Glenn amendment on India as well as Pakistan.

Glenn amendment included suspension of aid, including economic development assistance, credits and credit guarantees by the US government, US bank loans to the governments of India and Pakistan, loans from international financial institutions, such as the IMF and World Bank, and exports of dual-use nuclear or missile items.

However, in July of 1998, US lifted the sanctions on both the countries for purchasing agricultural products from US farmers. Later in the year President Clinton exercised his waiver on lifting restrictions on the activities of US banks in Pakistan.

Image
2001: After the 9/11 attacks and US’s invasion in various countries to eradicate militancy, Pakistan became one of the most important strategic allies for United States.

Initially Pakistan tried to strike a negotiation deal with Taliban and al Qaeda members to handover Osama bin Laden to American authorities. However, when negotiations failed, Pakistan allowed American army to use its military bases for launching attacks on Afghan soil.

However, President Pervez Musharraf confessed that the country had no option but to support United States as it had threatened Pakistan of “bombing it into stone age” if it did not join the fight against al Qaeda.

Simultaneously in 2001, US officials introduced a bill to lift all the sanctions, previously imposed on Pakistan under Pressler and Glenn amendments.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVo9JorURws&feature=fvwrel

2003: United States officially forgave $1 billion worth of loan it had granted to Pakistan in a goodwill gesture and appreciation for Pakistan’s cooperation.

Image
2004: President George Bush officially declared Pakistan as a non-Nato ally granting it the authority to purchase strategic and advanced military equipments.

Since 2004, US army has launched various drone strikes on the north-western side of the country. The drone strikes aim to target Pakistani Taliban and supporters of al Qaeda, however, the strikes have also resulted in latge civilian deaths and caused much opposition from Pakistanis.

2007: A report was issued in which Pakistan was accused of using aid money provided by US to Pakistan for its cooperation on war on terror, for strengthening its defence against India.

2008: The trust, on both sides, has been missing since the war on terror started as US on several occasions has accused Pakistan Army to tip the Taliban and pro-Taliban factions off on US operations.

In the June of 2008, an air strike by the US Army killed 11 paramilitary soldiers of Pakistan Army Frontier Corps, along with eight Taliban. The strike and deaths instigated a fierce reaction from Pakistani command calling the act to have shaken the foundations of mutual trust and cooperation.

Image
2009: President Musharraf confessed that the billions of dollars of aid that Pakistan received from United States, for being a partner in war against terror, were diverted and channelled in order to build better defence mechanism against India.

The famous Kerry-Lugar Bill, which invited much controversy and criticism, was passed in the October of 2009. The bill entailed the approval of granting $7.5 billion of non-military aid, if the command of the country accepted certain condition. The bill clearly showed US’s distrust in Pakistan’s military command and considered Pakistani Taliban more threatening than Afghan Taliban, amongst many other essential points.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1udYqw2Ey4&feature=plcp

2010: In the beginning of the year, Pakistan Army in a joint operation with US intelligence agencies captured Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, a famous Taliban commander, from the tribal belt of Pakistan. The success of the operation was hailed by the United States and Pakistan was praised for its utmost cooperation.

2011: In the beginning of 2011, Raymond Davis, a CIA agent in Pakistan killed two Pakistani men in Lahore, claiming that they came to rob him. Davis was taken into custody for killing civilians, however, American officials claimed that he was entitled to diplomatic immunity and must be released immediately.

Image
Raymond Davis was later acquitted of the murder charges and was sent to United States.

In the May of 2011, Osama bin Laden was killed in an operation conducted by US Navy Seals in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

President Barrack Obama claimed that the information pertaining to the operation conducted in Abbottabad was not shared with Pakistan Army. However, ISI claimed that the operation was conducted jointly, a claim which was blatantly denied by President Asif Ali Zardari.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9i4m_ohTTw&feature=relmfu

Since the war on terror started in 2001, Pakistan has received an estimated amount of $20 billion from United States; however, in the wake of OBL’s raid US withheld $800 million of aid to Pakistan.

US-Pakistan relations plummeted again when 24 Pakistani soldiers died in an air strike by the US Army. Afghan and US officials claimed that the firing was a result of the attack launched from the Pakistani side of the border, however, the Pakistani military and government denied the claims.

As a result of the attack, Pakistani government ordered US army to evacuate Salala air base which was being used to launch offensive on Taliban and militants. Moreover, the government also halted Nato supplies for United Sates.

Image
2012: Since the beginning of 2012, various political parties along with the military command of the country, met and held discussions on restoring Nato supplies. Diplomats from United States also tried to reduce the friction.

Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani said that the supplies were blocked without any pressure and will be restored with consensus.

Moreover, Nato Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen urged Pakistan to reopen Nato ground supply routes to Afghanistan. However, Rasmussen also said that Pakistan had not been invited to the crucial 25th Nato summit to be held in May in Chicago.

Simultaneously, US Senator John Kerry, a leading proponent of US aid for Pakistan, said that Pakistan needs to be more cooperative, in order to eliminate Taliban sanctuaries from the country.

However, top Pakistani leaders decided to meet on May 15,  in order to discuss ending a blockade of foreign military supply routes into Afghanistan and repairing US relations, signaling a rapprochement ahead of a Nato summit.

Simultaneously, in a sudden shift in events, Nato, on May 15, said that it will invite President Zardari to the alliance’s summit in Chicago, after the country’s foreign minister proposed reopening its Afghan border to Nato military supplies. President Zardari accepted the invitation and decided to attend the summit.

Image
However, on May 18, US lawmakers in the House of Representatives debating the National Defence Authorisation Act voted 412-1 for an amendment that could block up to $650 million in proposed payments to Pakistan unless Islamabad lets coalition forces resume shipment of war supplies across its territory.

However, on the same day, four containers laden with supplies for the US Embassy in Kabul crossed into Afghanistan from Pakistan via Torkham border post.

A local official while confirming supplies to the US Embassy via Torkham said he could not say when the cargo had been transported.

“Pakistan government has never put restriction on the transportation of supplies for the diplomatic missions, including the American Embassy in Kabul,” a senior official, who was dealing with the matter, said.

“Ban on the transportation of Nato supplies is still intact.”

Simultaneously President Zardari arrived in Washington on May 19 to attend the Nato summit in Chicago. However, both the countries were unable to strike a conclusive deal on the restoration of Nato supplies as the summit ended.

leaders-pose-for-a-picture-in-Nato-summit
In a fresh warning to Pakistan, a Senate panel on May 23 approved a foreign aid budget for next year that slashes US assistance to Islamabad by more than half and threatens further reductions if it fails to open supply routes to Nato forces in Afghanistan.

Sen Patrick Leahy, a Democrat and the chairman of the subcommittee, and the panel’s top Republican, Sen Lindsey Graham, said money for Pakistan was cut 58 per cent as lawmakers questioned Islamabad’s commitment to the fight against terrorism.

Moreover, the Senate Appropriations Committee, on May 24, voted to cut aid to Pakistan by a symbolic $33 million – $1 million for each year of jail time handed to Shakil Afridi, a Pakistani doctor who allegedly assisted the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in finding Osama bin Laden.

However, the United States agreed to reimburse $1.18 billion or almost 75 per cent of the claims Pakistan has submitted for the expenses incurred in the fight against militants along the Afghan border.

The approval showed that despite increased tensions, the US financial assistance to Pakistan has continued although it is becoming increasingly difficult to get congressional support for helping Pakistan.

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, on June 7, said that the United States was running out of patience with Pakistan over safe havens of insurgents who attack US troops across the border in Afghanistan.

Image
Panetta spoke after talks with Afghan Defence Minister Abdul Rahim Wardak on the latest leg of an Asian tour that has taken him to India, but not Islamabad in a sign of how dire US-Pakistan relations are.

On June 8, US Assistant Defence Secretary Peter Lavoy arrived in Islamabad, in a fresh attempt to bring an end to a six-month blockade on Nato supplies, crossing into Afghanistan.

However, on June 11, the United States withdrew negotiators from Pakistan after talks failed to produce a deal on reopening vital Nato supply routes into Afghanistan. Sherry Rehman, Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, still sounded optimistic and said that the return of an American negotiating team from Islamabad, where it worked with Pakistani counterparts on revival of the Nato supply routes, does not represent an institutional US pullout.

Moreover,  Panetta ruled out an apology over an air strike last year that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers and badly set back efforts to improve US-Pakistani ties, saying it was “time to move on.”

Gen John Allen, the top commander of American and Nato forces in Afghanistan, visited Pakistan on Wednesday, amidst heightened tensions between the two countries.

Image
The agenda of the talks remained to restore Nato supply routes and cross-border attacks launched on Pakistani soil from Afghanistan.

Pakistan, on July 3, agreed to reopen key supply routes into Afghanistan ending a bitter stand-off after US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she was sorry for the loss of life in a botched air raid.

A US official said that as part of the deal Washington will release about $1.1 billion to the Pakistani military from a US “coalition support fund” designed to reimburse Pakistan for the cost of counter-insurgency operations.

Moreover, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on July 8 that the United States and Pakistan were putting past tensions behind them to focus on the future, after meeting her Pakistani counterpart Hina Rabbani Khar in Tokyo.

It was the first meeting between Clinton and Khar since the two countries last week struck a deal to re-open supply routes, closed for seven months following a US attack in which 24 Pakistani soldiers died.

President Barack Obama, on July 17, named Richard G Olson to be the US ambassadors to Pakistan, tasking him with shaping highly sensitive relationships after US troops pull out.

Image
The US commander in Afghanistan Gen John Allen visited GHQ to hold talks in Pakistan on August 2 for the first time since Islamabad ended a seven-month blockade on Nato supplies destined for the 10-year war effort.

Moreover, Pakistan received $1.1 billion dollars from the United States for its fight against militants, the first installment of its kind since December 2010 on the same day.

The agenda of the meeting was focused on improving security along the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States Sherry Rehman met with Congressman Dan Burton on August 3, a Republican from Indiana, and discussed ways to enhance Pakistan-US relationship.

The United States and Pakistan reached an understanding on joint operations against the Haqqani network on August 5, However a joint decision could not be agreed upon.

The sources said the issue of cross-border attacks, by the Haqqani network into Afghanistan and by TTP into Pakistan, was discussed in a series of meetings between senior US and Pakistani officials during the week.

The US State Department confirmed on August 23 that an American diplomat had a meeting with Pakistani officials at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Islamabad as Pakistan lodged its first formal protest with the United States over drone strikes.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Comments (94) Closed




Image
ansar
May 13, 2012 03:02am
well it was good to see some better relationships between the 2 countries back in the days. I can just wish it could happen again an hopefully soon.
Image
ihtesham
May 13, 2012 06:47am
US has always worked for keeping military above civilian set up in Pakistan for it suits them(Noam Chomsky).Hussain Haqqani was victimised for advocating Kerry Lugar bill for the civilians instead of Pak Army.
Image
Uzair
May 13, 2012 04:53am
No countries are ever friends. Its just they have interests in that country.
Image
Lukman
May 13, 2012 04:00pm
Let us look at it from US point of view. US is by far the biggest benefactor of Pakistan. The only working institution of Pakistan, its army was built with American aid. Its economy has been sustained by American tax-payer's money. It is home to millions of Pakistanis. But Pakistanis hate it and love China, which has exploited it and given it nothing except lip sympathy.
Image
Viki
May 13, 2012 06:51pm
Well looks like the aid to Pakistan just grows everytime US is in war.. another reason why Pakistan would not want a peaceful Afghanistan. Pakistan must have felt the pinch once the cold war ended and the aid stopped to flow in.. sure they don't want to make that mistake again...
Image
Asaf
May 13, 2012 11:25pm
I will be happy if USA can stop all aid to Pakistan, at least it will give Pakistan an opportunity to learn how to survive without aid. It will also help Pakistan to stay away from USA's trap.
Image
Maham Umer
May 15, 2012 12:13pm
Pakistan needs American aid as it is the call of an hour.. America should trust Pakistanis if they want better cooperation!!
Image
Ali
May 12, 2012 09:28am
Is this even written by a Dawn news Rep or copy pasted from some blog? Look at the english used.
Image
naseer ud-din
May 12, 2012 09:32am
it is pre-established fact that pak and usa are meesay relation and usa used pakistan whenever it needed.
Image
deepak
May 12, 2012 09:41am
Pakistan has lost it one of the most trusted ally... due to terrorism.. Control it before its too late and pakistan looses world....
Image
shifa
May 15, 2012 08:46pm
Let us build an environment of trust between the two countries , keeping the fact in mind that nobody is indispensable. Let us not allow the bad guys,in both countries, to have any final say in the process of reconciliation.
Image
deepak
May 12, 2012 01:17pm
no international relation is without a purpose.. some are direct profit and loss and some are for tactical advantage.. Both have used each other some or other way...
Image
windie
May 12, 2012 01:18pm
the US never was and will never be a 'trusted' ally. Pakistan is at this stage today due to the corrupt leaders that care for non but themselves.
Image
JAY KOMERATH
May 12, 2012 01:42pm
One word-NOT TRUSTWORTHY
Image
Ali
May 13, 2012 04:15am
Next Super Power to hit ! CHINA
Image
AD
May 12, 2012 05:01pm
No more sympathy with Pakistan ...
Image
Amanullah Sipra
May 14, 2012 09:51am
A very useful information for the students of international politics; Dawn always takes care of every segment of the society
Image
ram
May 12, 2012 06:17pm
Heading should be: Pakistan....US relations... Now a History!!!
Image
Shawn
May 12, 2012 06:55pm
Who was Pk's trusted ally ? Pak never had a trusted ally, they're all selfish...World has already been lost
Image
Raju
May 12, 2012 07:32pm
Americans aren't anybody's friends. They are opportunists and selfish by nature.
Image
MrT
May 12, 2012 08:26pm
so who created terrorist and why? It is a widely know fact that terrorism was created to recruit fighters against USSR. Now we are facing the pain of this Frankenstein. Interesting this Frankenstein is still very useful tool for many and they still nurture them.
Image
Asad Khan
May 12, 2012 08:47pm
Very true bro!
Image
Ayeesha Khan
May 12, 2012 09:19pm
Its a well known fact that Pak-US were never allies. if we go in the history.US has always used PAK to achieve its evil objectives to maintain its supremacy among world's other super powers and spread its corrupt CIA agents all over the world. What happened in 1980? why did Pakistan help US to break the Soviet Union? Its a shame that we Pakistanis have been serving US for decades. Whether its our economy. whether its our military or even our Pak-Army. What were the consequences of the US wars which Pakistan suffered as a front line state? (1). bearing load of thousands of afghan immigrants (2)Total dependence on US aid with no credible or profitable exports (3) The secret branch of CIA operatives growing all over Pakistan(4) The highly trained afghan mujahidins turned against Pakistan (that was part of CIA secret operations we all know). There are thousands of em. ITS A WELL KNOWN FACT United States will not achieve its motives without help of PAKISTAN. Final verdict...IF US LEAVES PAKISTAN NOW HELPLESS OR STOPS ITS AID, CONSEQUENCES WOULD BE DIRE!
Image
MSaif
May 13, 2012 02:22am
Good
Image
Mikal
May 15, 2012 07:27am
So is every human being on earth.
Image
Aamir Younis
May 12, 2012 10:36pm
good informative summary
Image
Farman Ullah Chandio
May 16, 2012 05:45am
No country can damage Pakistan if it Shows credibility in the eyes of China.Pakistan should try to mend its ways.Rather than holding others(the US etc.) responsible for our failure, we should confess the blunders we have committed throughout history of 65 years.Pakistan must strengthen its relations with china by opening Gawadar Port as first step. Moreover, cooperating with Iran will also be in our benefit because we are about to go through the circumstances that Iran is. Pakistan can manage to come out of energy crisis if it pays due deference to Iran.It should play a vital role in eliminating differences among the Arabs(so called Muslims/modified form of Yahudis) and Iran..
Image
Hassan Mahmood KTK
May 18, 2012 07:40pm
plz dnt expect from pakistani leadershhip tht they wll perform according to comman pakistani thinking . they wll always play with comman pakistani emotions.Recently prime minister yusuf raza gilani while intervieng to british media ,suggested pakistani nation that if pakistani are fedup from the crises going on in pakistan .then they are allowed to leave pakistan. how u can expect that pakistan wll take a most popular decesion. recently one decesion had been taken regarding nato supply but nowdays govt going to take it back because this decesion is not approved by US.WE running our country with imported foreign policy. we are wishing to become a closed ally of US like india regarding this we tried several times to prove ourself that we are your closed strategic partner but each and every time US demands .... DO MORE...along with this being as a muslim country we became the ally of nato to gain the pleasure of US.which is the group of countries whose are in tends to erase ISLAM and followers of islam from the land of ALLAH.SO please before going to creticise US first we have to look it our own collar.we provide opportunities to US and western world for intervention.
Image
P1845
Jun 05, 2012 02:41pm
I would agree, wholeheartedly. Pakistan should stand on it's own. It has generous natural resources and a decent population that wants to do better. A request to populous of Pakistan: Pls invest (not government bu your own time, money and intent) into education. The normal kind all all shall follow. Goodwill to all.. //best
Image
M A Janjua
May 18, 2012 01:43pm
Relations between nations are dependent on the diplomatic skills of their leadership, Pakistan has by and large lacked in this aspect and have not been rewarded for their sacrifices which have been rather taken as mandatory. The brave nation has lost around fifty thousand innocent lives at the hands of ignorents/ arrogants and gained nothing except rebukes. Any one having a sleepless night would do first thing in the morning to bash Pakistan for not obeying the masters. Wish we can realize our goals and stride towards that resolutely.
Image
pakistani
May 18, 2012 12:28pm
It feels as if this article is written in some Indian newspaper! The writer has shown no love for Pakistan and in fact has made sure that any point that could go against the country is brought forth. Excellent work, DAWN.
Image
Ahmad Jamal
May 18, 2012 12:12pm
Countries only have to watch their interests, they are never friends, so did USA and i.e what was always required to be done at Pakistan's side. Pakistan side is having a leadership deficit-even today, the so called- Establishment has never been able to understand the strength of economy, technology and education, they only believed in warfare, so we have a Bomb but no infrastructure, water, electricity and average Pakistani has nothing. Pakistan's command is in wrong hands, don't blame US.
Image
habib
May 18, 2012 12:16pm
Simple truth is South Asian nations including Pakistan's policy should be to be friends with its immediate neighbors. In the current state they are enemies of each other or in the best case they are using each other while trying to be friends with a power that sits on the opposite side of the globe. Until Pakistan realize the mistakes and go for its rectification we will continue to be laughing stalk of the world.
Image
Mudassir
May 18, 2012 02:21pm
From The past of US every Pakistani deny to accept America as a freind But lets see the leaders choice
Image
US CENTCOM
Jun 07, 2012 06:00pm
Throughout the short history of Pakistan, its relations with the United States have had its ups and downs, but no one should disagree that the United States has stood by the people of Pakistan during their times of need. USAID had been active since the 1950s in providing a variety of assistance programs, from agriculture and education to energy and the military. Whenever natural disasters hit Pakistan, the U.S. government and its people have been among the first to open their hearts and pockets. The floods of 2010 serve as an example. Relationships are always two-way streets, and in the past both countries have made mistakes that caused sufferings for ordinary people.
Image
US CENTCOM
Jun 07, 2012 06:01pm
The United States is committed to the security of the region including Pakistan. President Obama had promised not to abandon Pakistan and repeat the mistakes of the past, but on the other hand Pakistan has to do its part in dismantling terrorists’ safe havens on its soil. Is it too much to ask? These are the same terrorists who have been destabilizing Pakistan with their daily attacks on innocent civilians and security forces. Unless we are able to neutralize the remaining terrorist groups, peace for the people of the region will remain scarce, and mistrust among the two nations will continue. Capt. Joseph Kreidel DET-United States Central Command www.centcom.mil/ur
Image
Cyrus Howell
Jun 04, 2012 03:09pm
"The State is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." -- Frederic Bastiat
Image
ENGR.JAMAL WAZIR
May 22, 2012 12:11pm
A non muslim cann't be an ally of Pakistan, Secondly the leadership of Pakistan is in wrong hands..from the day of independence we are lacking a good and loyal leader,, everyone is working for his own benefits. First we should be united and have to choose a leader which can solve our problems not that of other countries(America). We all should have one voice, then we will be able to defend our selves otherwise we have the leaders which can do everything for money. They are not caring about Pakistan .Have trust on yourself Insha Allah everything will be fine AS: "GOD HELP THOSE WHO HELPS THEMSELVES" We the nation and the people of Pakistan have to do something for the betterment of Pakistan having no hope from the present leaders.. We have to choose new leaders and new people should have to be introduced...Then we will be able to decide what is good and what is wrong.
Image
Whooaaa
May 22, 2012 12:14pm
There is no permanent enemy and permanent friend.
Image
Nasir Shah
May 22, 2012 02:07pm
US gives you fish to eat but will never teach you how to fish.
Image
Ashutosh
May 22, 2012 02:35pm
that would be in US's interest....as well as India's..
Image
@EngrNasirJamal
May 22, 2012 02:45pm
The million dollar question is why did Pakistan allow itself to be used so often? It has become our national psyche to blame others for the problems that we have created ourselves. Blaming USA and the Jew Lobby for everything that goes wrong in Pakistan is the easy way out. We should try to raise ourself as a nation and try to solve our problems ourselves instead of relying on foreign powers such as United States.
Image
Nazir Ahmad Cheema
May 22, 2012 03:28pm
As a Pakistani American Citizen for 42 years, I can say with confidence that it is Pakistani mentality and to sart off to Pakistanis (Chalaki Baz) but that mentality DOES NOT work outside on International. Make no mistake all the leaders of Pakistan ener did to make themselves look good to internal audiance . They shoul not blame any country except themselves. They expect every body in the world to be their faithful friend, BASED ON WHAT? The same will happen with China. China is skilled and old Civilization and Pakistanie leader been always Punk kids to scare India when they can not scare a dog on the Internationa street. It was the US millitary help for their own business capitalis to give aid to Pakistan to slave the nation. Same will happen regadless who they make frieds with. Do't they read Qur'an.....? God does not change a people who do not chage themselves First.l
Image
Samandar khan
May 22, 2012 04:17pm
We should have India as our friends.
Image
Samndar Khan
May 22, 2012 04:19pm
We should have India as our freind.
Image
Mustafa
May 22, 2012 06:43pm
Pakistanis from top political leaders to ordinary Ricksha Walas love to bash America. Has anyone ever asked where most Pakistanis go not only to make better future bust also to live permanently? Would this be China, Russia, North Korea? Definitely not. It is United States of America the most hated as well as the most loved. This hate and love affair is very confusing.
Image
Waqas
May 22, 2012 09:01pm
tu to rehne de deepak
Image
manghirmalani
May 23, 2012 02:01am
Since President Ayub, who I met three times, and his signed copy Friends not Masters, after him many Pimps from Army have come and gone, except and ZAB. May God bless Pakistan.
Image
Qasim Baloch
May 23, 2012 07:42am
Pakistan has always palyed in the hands of US from the very strat.It is dependent on United Staes for civil and military aid.What can we expect from our leaders who are slaves of America.
Image
shahzaib
Jun 07, 2012 01:16pm
The US needs to stop the drone attacks. They've admitted they cause civilian casualties themselves yet they defend themselves by saying that they haven't inflicted an extreme number of civilian deaths. If they don't show sympathy towards innocent humans why do they expect it back? "What goes around, comes around."
Image
faheem
May 23, 2012 08:29am
well, now its tym for pakistan to say no more.... and move to its neighbours, US or any other europeans can never b the friends of pakistan or muslims... nato supply is very big weapon pakistan has...........
Image
kayt
May 23, 2012 12:22pm
You don;t have someone as a friend. You 'make' friends. And how is that? by sending terrorists? Better luck some other way.
Image
kayt
May 23, 2012 12:23pm
That's a deluded remark. When will you grow up and recognise your own faults?
Image
kayt
May 23, 2012 12:24pm
trust comes in when there is credibility. And before talking about US. Where is your country's credibility bro?
Image
kayt
May 23, 2012 12:26pm
well, its about US cooperation with Pakistan. Instead of cribbing, can you write one point and show the love between US and pakistan.
Image
Ikram
May 23, 2012 01:43pm
Not true Pakistani army is made by pakistani money
Image
Ikram
May 23, 2012 01:45pm
Aid? its the money we receive by providing services Please do not call aid.
Image
Ikram
May 23, 2012 01:46pm
India can never be our friend
Image
Ikram
May 23, 2012 02:02pm
No thank you. Eat grass I hope America gives every things to India what it has been giving to Pakistan.
Image
ikram
May 23, 2012 01:49pm
You can have him. Thanks
Image
Ikram
May 23, 2012 01:51pm
If we were not good for them they will never have us.
Image
Mustafa
May 23, 2012 02:44pm
Ikram, you are absolutely right. But the problem is Pakistani militants, fanatics and anti-Americans may pose threat to America to the point where America may decide how to protect America. What will happen is anyone's guess.
Image
Jerkovski
May 23, 2012 03:06pm
Really ? And call us kaffirs and idol worshippers and hate us till the day of judgement? To be friends, you must first get your countrymen to get off the opium of hatred that is brewed in their hearts by their leaders
Image
Jerskovski
May 23, 2012 03:07pm
And if the aid didnt come from the USA, you would still be able to spend money for the army. Sure, thats possible, but then a lot more people would have to starve to keep your army fed. Think about it watson.
Image
Jerkovski
May 23, 2012 03:10pm
Oh boy !!! you take the argument to a new level. Now nations also are muslims and non-muslims? !!!
Image
Mustafa
May 23, 2012 04:59pm
Unfortunately the the fanatics do not know that Islam is the second largest religion in America after Christianity and growing faster than any other religion. Fortunately American Muslims are not fanatics and Jihadists and they will defend America against all enemies of America. I know it is a false accusation that US wants to erase Islam. The true enemies of Islam are the Muslims who call themselves Muslims but do not wish to live in peace and co-exidtence with not only their own brother Muslims because they belong to another sect, firqa, Madhab, language, ethnic group, political party, Tehreek but they also do not want to live in pecae with Christians, Hindus, Jews and other Non-Muslim people. They do not follow what Allah says in the Holy Quran: (Continues in next post)
Image
Mustafa
May 23, 2012 05:00pm
(From last post).......Allah says in the Holy Quran.....O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other (not that ye may despise (each other). Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of God is (he who is) the most righteous of you. And God has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things). Holy Quran Surah al-Hujurat (49:13) When Allah says "and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other" and this clearly means we must co-exist with all mankind in peace and harmony.
Image
abdullah khan
May 23, 2012 05:46pm
My friend if you really wanna control terrorism... control it in Palestine, Indian occupied Kashmir, Afghanistan,... you have no knowledge of the word 'terrorism'.
Image
Chuck Hastings
May 24, 2012 04:02am
With allies like Pakistan, the United States doesn't need enemies.
Image
Syed
May 24, 2012 02:05pm
Pakistan has been poisoned by US. Had we not looked to aid from US, we would have been a different nation. This crucial mistake has cost us our ideology. If there is one country that has sabotaged the real ideology of Pakistan in colossal heaps, It has got to be the USA.
Image
August141947
Jun 04, 2012 12:43pm
We are a nation of great people, who know how to smile and love each other even under the circumstances prevailing presently in the country. We are a nation of great entrepreneurs who have survived worst power crisis, law and order situation etc . Despite all odds, the people of this country are still hopeful as they receive the motivation of survival and hope daily ...five times. This is the country where family's are connected, where we live for each other. This is the country whose brave soldiers volunteers themselves for postings at places like Siachin. No nation in the world can gauge our potential...we are born to win no matter how hard life be made for us by so called civilized world.
Image
Isadora
Jul 04, 2012 05:41pm
Thank you, Dawn, for the timeline. I can add it to my others. Even timelines have partisanship in them, but if you get enough of them and read them, sometimes it's possible to find a little of the truth. Your country is a mess and, it's only my opinion, but Pakistanis don't seem to want to stand up, and along with their complaints of the U.S., take responsibility for their own mistakes. But what else is new?
Image
shahid
May 27, 2012 09:21pm
i agree
Image
ali muhammad
May 28, 2012 08:29am
Relations b/w countries are based on gain and loss.There are two types of relations in the world,1-developed countries with developed and 2-developed with developing.In pak-us relations it is the second type.The history of pak-us relations tells us that pakistan always looked for financial assistance while US knew the strategic location of pakistan in relation to cold war against russia.since we do not have the equal status,we have been treated always as a minnow,which is a natural thing,'powerful alwayz dictates'.our relations often get strained when our incompetent govt deal without forcasting the consequences.for eg;if we allowed nato goods to pass through our territory,why didnt our incompetent govt foresaw the damage it would cause to our roads.
Image
BH A
May 28, 2012 10:19am
Service? You call this service? US is undoubtedly opportunists and they are using Pakistan. But Pakistan is also blackmailing US by minting money for god knows what kind of actual actions which you are calling as service? Whole country's existence is on stake for the last few years. Have Pakistan ever really earned this amount of money from their actual industries, agriculture, export and other internal business? Or is this the only way this country mint money by providing what you call as service?
Image
Agha Ata
May 28, 2012 01:31pm
Well said! :)
Image
Anuj
Jul 05, 2012 10:59am
well said Mr Cheema.
Image
ibraheem
May 29, 2012 04:38pm
there is nothing as a free lunch. both countries need eachother.
Image
Patriot
Jul 04, 2012 09:45am
Agree
Image
Raoul Ciao
Jul 05, 2012 11:06am
couldn't agree more with your observation of the divide amongst Muslims and their antipathy to other "tribes".....
Image
shah
Jul 05, 2012 10:46am
If we turn the pages of history,histry clears that US is never trustworthy with his allies wether they are countries or agents etc.We entered in war against terror which was actually a trip to grip the muslim comunity.If we look back that what did we get from war agaist terror,atleast i shall only find wrath of our brothers,dead bodies of innocent Pakistanies killed in DRone attacks,anti-pakistan sentiments in the hearts of baloches that lost their loved ones in thz war.Simply we are disintigrating as we r staking in this war.
Image
Cyrus Howell
Jun 04, 2012 03:29pm
Agree.
Image
Cyrus Howell
Jun 04, 2012 03:31pm
I love China and it's people. Nothing wrong with that. They are the good citizens of the world.
Image
Cyrus Howell
Jun 04, 2012 03:37pm
Yes. You should. The way to have a friend is to be a friend.
Image
Cyrus Howell
Jun 04, 2012 04:11pm
Goal #1 Electrical Power. Goal #2 Flood Control. Goal #3 Street Safety for all citizens and businessmen. Goal #4 Stronger economy and lower taxation. Goal #5 Use of natural resources in the public interest. Goal #6 Liberty and Justice for all.
Image
P1845
Jun 05, 2012 02:50pm
I don't understand why a nice article about history turns into a bickering waste of time? Shame on all of us for spending time on negative energy. In any case, all neighbors should be friends. Neighborhood in geographical sense is GOD made; however, next logical step for neighbors is to be at least cordial, even if not true friends. ../best
Image
Cyrus Howell
Jun 04, 2012 03:02pm
Pakistan's leaders must realize the country has been abandoned by the United States. This has not sunk into their minds, but it soon will. So much for being politicians and not statesmen.
Image
Nasir
Jun 05, 2012 05:40am
I would agree , we should first see the mess we have created by our selves not the US, we need to be sincere to our country and that implies reducing our expenditures, and bring discipline to our lives by Good Governance, economic revival thr production, and so on and above all Honesty
Image
Harold Carpenter
Jun 07, 2012 08:00pm
USA will, I hope, develop a strategic relationship with India and drop this useless attempt at working with Pakistan.
Image
parveez
Jun 07, 2012 08:17pm
DON'T TRUST THE USA. DO WITH OUT AID, BUT OUR CORRUPT LEADERS CAN NOT DO THAT. THEU NEED THEIR SWISS ACCOUNTS.
Image
Agha Ata
Jul 05, 2012 04:15am
What about education and health and corruption?
Image
Umer
Jul 05, 2012 04:26am
PAK & US never allies. .
Image
Virendra Kaul
Jul 05, 2012 05:50am
Isn't this opportunism?
Image
Prateek Saxena
Jul 05, 2012 04:53pm
And why not? I am an Indian and I can say for sure that most Indians do not harbor ill feelings of any sort towards the Pakistani people. There are elements on both side of the border which want us to hate each other as this mutual hate gives them power over us. But what we as Indians are concerned about is the various anti Indian policies of the Pakistani government. I am not saying that the Indian government is all angelic or anything. If anything, we the people need to rise over all this petty politics and engage each other in a constructive manner....