Monte Carlo’s cover photo
Monte Carlo

Monte Carlo

Software Development

San Francisco, California 41,955 followers

Trust your agents in production

About us

Monte Carlo is the agent trust platform that unifies data and agent observability to monitor, troubleshoot, and improve production AI systems. As enterprises prepare to deploy thousands of agents across business-critical use cases, Monte Carlo provides the reliability infrastructure to support them along this AI transformation, from human-guided agents to fully autonomous operations. Founded in 2019 and backed by leading investors, Monte Carlo empowers data and AI teams to ship trusted AI at scale.

Website
https://www.montecarlo.ai
Industry
Software Development
Company size
51-200 employees
Headquarters
San Francisco, California
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2019

Employees at Monte Carlo

View 558 employees at Monte Carlo

or

By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.

See all employees

Locations

Updates

  • View profile for Ravit Jain
    Ravit Jain Ravit Jain is an Influencer

    Founder & Host of “The Ravit Show” | Influencer & Creator | LinkedIn Top Voice | Startups Advisor | Gartner Ambassador | Data & AI Community Builder | Influencer Marketing B2B | Marketing & Media | (Mumbai/San Francisco)

    Breaking: Monte Carlo just launched Bayes!!!! An AI teammate that watches your AI agents and the data feeding them, finds what broke, and proposes the fix. The detail that got my attention: Bayes will draft the right fix for engineers on its own and file it as a Jira ticket or PR - all you have to do is click "approve." That's as close to self-healing as it gets Why this lands for me. This fall I have been on the floor at Dreamforce, UiPath FUSION, Equinix Horizon, IBM Think Mumbai and Gartner IT Symposium. Almost every conversation with a CIO or CDO hits the same wall. The agent works as a pilot. Then it goes to production, a pipeline lands late at 2 AM, and the agent keeps answering confidently from stale data. Nobody notices until a customer does. And the on-call team? Half of them muted the alert channel months ago. Monte Carlo’s launch example is painfully familiar: 12 alerts between 2:50 AM and 4:29 AM. A late Stripe load, a timed out dbt rebuild, missing rows, a slow support agent. At 7:42 AM, Bayes posts 1 message: - Support agent is quoting yesterday’s refund amounts. - Cause: the orders rebuild timed out after the Stripe load arrived 50 min late. - Fix: re-run orders and 2 downstream models, raise the timeout to 45 min. - 4 alerts grouped into 1 issue. 1 agent, 3 tables. That is root cause traced across the agent AND the warehouse in one place. In most enterprises I talk to, those live in 2 tools owned by 2 teams. What is under the hood: 1. Learn: reads your AI and data stack, proposes a monitoring plan, deploys it when you approve 2. Detect: triage, is it real and how urgent 3. Fix: evidence-backed root cause and a suggested remediation 4. Measure: verifies the fix actually landed, then loops again Add monitor tuning so coverage does not rot, and PII discovery for compliance. The part enterprise leaders should care about most is the autonomy ladder: Manual, Assisted, Supervised, Autonomous. Bayes earns scope domain by domain. Start at “it proposes, I approve.” Expand when it proves itself. Early numbers Monte Carlo shared: 1 global bank: 200%+ more real incidents caught, 87% fewer false positives 1 global retailer: 75% of monitoring deployed by the agent, full coverage in 30 days 1 beverage distributor: plan to production in 24 hrs It works in Slack, in the Monte Carlo platform, and via MCP inside Claude Code and Cursor. My take: last year everyone was racing to build agents. This year the hard question is whether you can prove why your agent said what it said. Fixing the agent without fixing the context it relies on it only moves the problem. For leaders running agents in production: what level of autonomy would you give a teammate like this on day 1? See it here: montecarlo.ai/bayes #montecarlo #aiagents #dataobservability #agentobservability #dataengineering #enterpriseai #aitrust #theravitshow

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • In this month’s Human in the Loop, we’re introducing our newest teammate, Bayes! Bayes is the world’s first AI teammate to deliver self-improving agents and the data powering them. It catches the failures your real users hit, fixes them, and gets better at your environment with every fix, so your team can trust its agents at the speed they ship. We also get into: 🔑 Why so many teams are taking the keys back from their agents 🚨 Another rough month for agents (one of them sent police a fake murder tip, seriously) 🎙️ Barr and Lior on DM Radio, talking about keeping agents trustworthy 💡 The meme of the month Give it a read and subscribe to stay on top of how teams are building agents they can trust. 👇 👇 👇

  • Excited to see our Bayes launch covered in SiliconANGLE & theCUBE! Self-improving agents let you scale trusted agents in production. And, if you don't follow our co-founder and CTO Lior Gavish, you might want to!

    One to three. That's how many agents a good AI engineer can keep under real watch. Up to there, you read the traces yourself, tune the prompts, chase the table that didn't refresh. Past it, agents start failing in ways nobody's watching – and you hear about it from a user. We hit that wall inside Monte Carlo. Yesterday we shipped what we built to get past it: Bayes, Monte Carlo's AI teammate. Bayes reads production traces and catches what real users hit, with no golden dataset to hand-build first. It follows each failure across the agent and the data that powers it – a silent retry loop, a stale pipeline, a model that drifted – then drafts the fix and checks that it held. You decide how much it takes on. Internally, we still keep a human on the ship step. On purpose. An agent that gets better with every fix is the only kind I'd trust in production. SiliconANGLE & theCUBE has the full details!

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Trust moves at human speed. Agents don’t. That gap is why we built Bayes, Monte Carlo’s AI teammate. It catches the failures real users hit, traces them through your agents and the data that powers them, fixes the root cause, and confirms the fix. Resolutions, not more alerts. You decide how much Bayes takes on. Barr has the full story below.

    Every data and AI leader I talk to says they're shipping agents faster than trust can keep up. AI ambitions don't stall for lack of agents. They stall because those agents can't be trusted. So we built a teammate for it. Meet Bayes, Monte Carlo's AI teammate. It catches the failures real users hit, follows them through the agent and the data that powers it, fixes the root cause, and confirms the fix. Every fix makes your agents better instead of letting them drift. You decide how much it takes on. #agenttrust #trustedai

  • Our CEO Barr Moses took the TechCrunch Disrupt stage with Rebecca Bellan, Cathy Gao, Aaron Jacobson to talk about the future of SaaS, AI-era moats and pricing. Give it a listen to hear more about how Monte Carlo transformed to be AI-first!

    SaaS isn't dead, but moats are. Speed to market and execution are going to win, even over deep domain knowledge. I talked to Barr Moses (Monte Carlo), Cathy Gao (Sapphire Ventures), and Aaron Jacobson (NEA) about these trends, shifting pricing strategies, and more on stage at TechCrunch Disrupt. Video in the comments.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Curious how we help enterprises trust their agents at scale AND keep an eye on agentic spend? Take a peak during a live demo we're hosting later this week!

    I'm excited to share a live demo my colleague Colt Sellers is running on October 7! Agents spend money on every run, and most teams only find out how much when the bill shows up. Figuring out which step, tool call, or retry loop drove the cost is still mostly manual. Colt will go inside the Monte Carlo platform and show how teams tie spend back to what actually caused it, and how to spend less per run without losing reliability. If you're running agents in production, this one's definitely worth your time! Check out the sign-up links in the comments 👇

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Agents spend money on every run, and most teams find out how much when the bill arrives. Tying that spend back to a step, a tool call, or a retry loop is manual work: pull traces, export token counts, guess which change made things worse. Sign up for this live demo on October 7 to see how Monte Carlo helps you learn more about what your agents cost, where that spend is wasted, and what to do about it!

    Live Demo: Monitoring Agent Cost and Performance with Monte Carlo

    Live Demo: Monitoring Agent Cost and Performance with Monte Carlo

    www.linkedin.com

  • How do you build a roadmap for a category with no playbook? Omer Spillinger on Monte Carlo's agent observability team shared our approach with Built In: start with failure modes you can point at in production. An agent that loops fifteen times and burns a million tokens while reporting success. An agent that answers a revenue question without ever querying the database. Those earn roadmap space, because they're what erodes trust in agents at scale. Every bet is an experiment with an owner, a ship date, and an honest readout. And we run the product against our own agents, so we live with our decisions before customers do. Full piece linked below! #AgentObservability #ProductManagement

    • No alternative text description for this image

Affiliated pages

Similar pages

Browse jobs