It's a regrettable reality that there is never enough time to cover all the interesting scientific stories we come across each month. In the past, we've featured year-end roundups of cool science stories we (almost) missed. This year, we're experimenting with a monthly collection. August's list includes a 3D digital reconstruction of the Shroud of Turin; injecting succulent leaves with phosphors to create plants that glow in different colors; a nifty shape-changing antenna; and snails with a unique ability to grow back their eyeballs.
Digitally reconstructing the Shroud of Turin
Perhaps the most famous "holy relic" is the Shroud of Turin, an old linen cloth that retains a distinct impression of the body of a crucified mine (both front and back). The legend is that Jesus himself was wrapped in the shroud upon his death around 30 CE, although modern scientific dating methods revealed the shroud is actually a medieval artifact dating to between 1260 and 1390 CE. A 3D designer named Cícero Moraes has created a 3D digital reconstruction to lend further credence to the case for the shroud being a medieval forgery, according to a paper published in the journal Archaeometry.
Moraes developed computer models to simulate draping a sheet on both a 3D human form and a bas-relief carving to test which version most closely matched the figure preserved in the shroud. He concluded that the latter was more consistent with the shroud's figure, meaning that it was likely created as an artistic representation or a medieval work of art. It was certainly never draped around an actual body. Most notable was the absence of the so-called "Agamemnon mask effect," in which a human face shrouded in fabric appears wider once flattened.
It's worth mentioning that skepticism surrounding the shroud's authenticity dates back centuries—even earlier than scholars previously thought, according to a new study published in the Journal of Medieval History. Nicolas Sarzeaud, a fellow of the Villa-Médicis Academy de France in Rome and a postdoc at the Université Catholique of Louvain in Belgium, uncovered a previously unknown ancient document—a treatise written in the 1370s by the medieval scholar Nicole Oresme in which he dismisses the shroud as a forgery—that is the oldest written evidence of skepticism surrounding the shroud to date. The next-earliest is a 1389 account by the bishop of Troyes, Pierre d’Arcis, who also dismissed the shroud as a fraud.



Loading comments...