Project Management Data Security

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Dr. Yusuf Hashmi

    Chief Cybersecurity Advisor | Trellix 2025 Global Top 100 Cyber Titans | Cybersecurity Strategy, Architecture, Operating Model| Speaker & Author

    19,129 followers

    “Mapping Cybersecurity Threats to Defenses: A Strategic Approach to Risk Mitigation” Most of the time we talk about reducing risk by implementing controls, but we don’t talk about if the implemented controls will reduce the Probability or Impact of the Risk. The below matrix helps organizations build a robust, prioritized, and strategic cybersecurity posture while ensuring risks are managed comprehensively by implementing controls that reduces the probability while minimising the impact. Key Takeaways from the Matrix 1. Multi-layered Security: Many controls address multiple attack types, emphasizing the importance of defense in depth. 2. Balance Between Probability and Impact: Controls like patch management and EDR reduce both the likelihood of attacks (probability) and the harm they can cause (impact). 3. Tailored Controls: Some attacks (e.g., DDoS) require specific solutions like DDoS protection, while broader threats (e.g., phishing) are countered by multiple layers like email security, IAM, and training. 4. Holistic Approach: Combining technical measures (e.g., WAF) with process controls (e.g., training, third-party risk management) creates a comprehensive security posture. This matrix can be a powerful tool for understanding how individual security controls align with specific threats, helping organizations prioritize investments and optimize their cybersecurity strategy. Cyber Security News ®The Cyber Security Hub™

  • View profile for Armand Ruiz
    Armand Ruiz Armand Ruiz is an Influencer

    building AI systems @meta

    206,636 followers

    How To Handle Sensitive Information in your next AI Project It's crucial to handle sensitive user information with care. Whether it's personal data, financial details, or health information, understanding how to protect and manage it is essential to maintain trust and comply with privacy regulations. Here are 5 best practices to follow: 1. Identify and Classify Sensitive Data Start by identifying the types of sensitive data your application handles, such as personally identifiable information (PII), sensitive personal information (SPI), and confidential data. Understand the specific legal requirements and privacy regulations that apply, such as GDPR or the California Consumer Privacy Act. 2. Minimize Data Exposure Only share the necessary information with AI endpoints. For PII, such as names, addresses, or social security numbers, consider redacting this information before making API calls, especially if the data could be linked to sensitive applications, like healthcare or financial services. 3. Avoid Sharing Highly Sensitive Information Never pass sensitive personal information, such as credit card numbers, passwords, or bank account details, through AI endpoints. Instead, use secure, dedicated channels for handling and processing such data to avoid unintended exposure or misuse. 4. Implement Data Anonymization When dealing with confidential information, like health conditions or legal matters, ensure that the data cannot be traced back to an individual. Anonymize the data before using it with AI services to maintain user privacy and comply with legal standards. 5. Regularly Review and Update Privacy Practices Data privacy is a dynamic field with evolving laws and best practices. To ensure continued compliance and protection of user data, regularly review your data handling processes, stay updated on relevant regulations, and adjust your practices as needed. Remember, safeguarding sensitive information is not just about compliance — it's about earning and keeping the trust of your users.

  • View profile for Sean Connelly🦉
    Sean Connelly🦉 Sean Connelly🦉 is an Influencer

    Architect of U.S. Federal Zero Trust | Co-author NIST SP 800-207 & CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model | Former CISA Zero Trust Initiative Director | Advising Governments & Enterprises

    22,633 followers

    🚨Incoming: The Federal Zero Trust Data Security Guide Fresh off the presses - In alignment with M-22-09, the Federal CDO Council and Federal CISO Council gathered a cross-agency team of data and security specialists to develop a comprehensive data security guide for Federal agencies. Representatives from over 30 Federal agencies and departments worked together to produce the Federal Zero Trust Data Security Guide, which: 🔹Establishes the vision and core principles for ZT data security 🔹Details methods to locate, identify, and categorize data with clear, actionable criteria 🔹Enhances data protection through targeted security monitoring and control strategies 🔹Equips practitioners with adaptable best practices to align with their agency’s unique mission requirements Securing the data pillar in Zero Trust has been a challenging endeavor, but it’s foundational to a resilient cybersecurity posture. This guide lays out essential principles and a roadmap to embed security at the core of data management beyond traditional perimeters. Here are a few key takeaways: 🔐 Core ZT Principles: Adopting a data-centric approach with strict access controls, data resiliency, and integration of privacy and compliance from day one. 📊 Data Inventory and Classification: It is crucial to understand the data landscape, and the guide provides insights into cataloging and labeling sensitive data for targeted protection. 🤝 Managing Third-Party Risks: From privacy-preserving technologies to detailed vendor assessments, agencies can better secure shared data and protect it from supply chain threats. I had the privilege of attending a couple of these Working Group meetings before leaving CISA earlier this year, and I congratulate the group on this necessary release. This guide aligns closely with CISA's Zero Trust Maturity Model, providing agencies with a robust framework to secure federal data assets and advance a strong, data-centric ZT security model. #data #zerotust #cybersecurity #technology #informationsecurity #computersecurity #datascience #artificialintelligence #digitaltransformation #bigdata 

  • View profile for Shiv Kataria

    Mentor | Leader | Risk Governance | Incident Response | Cybersecurity, Operational Technology [views are personal]

    23,478 followers

    Industrial Cyber Security—Layer by Layer OT environments can't rely on repackaged IT security checklists. Frameworks like IEC 62443 and NIST SP 800-82 demand a defence-in-depth strategy tailored to physical processes, real-time constraints, and integrated safety systems. This layered defence model visualizes the approach, moving from the physical perimeter to the core data: ✏️ Perimeter Security: Starts with physical controls like site fencing and progresses to network gateways that enforce one-way data flow. ✏️ Network Security: Involves segmenting the network (per the Purdue model), using industrial firewalls, and securing all remote access points. ✏️ Endpoint Security: Focuses on locking down devices with application whitelisting, ensuring secure boot processes, and using anomaly detection to spot unusual behavior. ✏️ Application Security: Secures the software layer through code-signing for logic downloads and hardening engineering workstations. ✏️ Data Security: Protects information itself with encrypted backups, PKI certificates for authenticity, and integrity monitoring. This entire strategy rests on two pillars: 1. Prevention: Proactive measures like architecture reviews, role-based access control (RBAC), and disciplined patch management. 2. Monitoring & Response: OT-aware security operations, practiced incident response playbooks, and the ability to perform forensics on industrial controllers. Why it matters: The data is clear. Over 80% of recent OT incidents exploited weak segmentation or unmanaged assets. Conversely, plants with layered controls have cut their mean-time-to-detect threats by 60% (Dragos 2024). Which of these security rings do you see most neglected in real-world plants? #OTSecurity #IEC62443 #NIST80082 #DefenseInDepth #IndustrialCyber #CriticalInfrastructure #CyberResilience

  • 🚀 My latest research "Cognitive Integration Process for Harmonising Emerging Risks" is now published in the Journal of AI, Robotics and Workplace Automation. 95% of Australian businesses are SMEs operating on ~$500 cybersecurity budgets. Yet they're being asked to securely integrate AI, quantum computing, and blockchain into their operations. How do you make sound security decisions about emerging technologies when you lack both technical expertise and enterprise-level resources? This is fundamentally a systems engineering challenge that requires first principles thinking. When I presented this research at the Programmable Software Developers Conference in Melbourne in March, I asked the room: "Heard of an AI security incident?" No hands up. "Would you know what an AI security incident looked like?" No hands. This illustrates the gap between AI hype and foundational security understanding - the first principles are missing. That's why I developed CIPHER (Cognitive Integration Process for Harmonising Emerging Risks) - a cognitive mental model that applies systems thinking to technology integration in resource-constrained environments. 🧠 Six cognitive stages: Contextualise, Identify, Prioritise, Harmonise, Evaluate, Refine 🔧 Systems engineering foundation: Built on cognitive science, game theory, and dynamical systems theory 🎯 Technology agnostic: Works across any emerging technology, any environment, any resource constraint CIPHER is a cybersecurity framework that gives smaller organisations the same strategic decision-making capabilities that large enterprises use, designed for their operational realities. It bridges the gap between cutting-edge security research and the practical constraints that define how most Australian businesses operate. The framework recognises that in resource-constrained environments, enterprise security models cannot be applied at scale. You need cognitive tools that help teams think systematically in complex integration challenges without requiring extensive technical depth or large security budgets. My research journey continues: I'm now deep into my UNSW Canberra Masters Research capstone, building on my 2023 work on LLMs in SME cybersecurity. The goal? Developing specialised security models and creating an agnostic, holistic measurement framework for LLMs in Australian SMEs - essentially taking the $500 problem from 2023 into the AI-driven reality of 2025. #CyberSecurity #SystemsEngineering #SME #Australia #AI #EmergingTech #ResourceConstrainedSecurity #CIPHER #FirstPrinciples

  • View profile for Sanjay Katkar

    Co-Founder & Jt. MD Quick Heal Technologies | Ex CTO | Cybersecurity Expert | Entrepreneur | Technology speaker | Investor | Startup Mentor

    31,403 followers

    Letter R: Risk (Assessment, Management, and Mitigation): A Continuous Guardian Our ‘A to Z of Cybersecurity’ tackles Risk Management - the ongoing process of identifying, evaluating, and mitigating potential threats to your organization. It's like having a security guard who never sleeps! Effective risk management isn't a one-time event; it's a continuous cycle: Identifying the Threats: · Threat Landscape Analysis: Understanding the evolving threats in your industry and the broader cybersecurity landscape. · Vulnerability Assessments: Regularly scanning your systems and processes to identify potential weaknesses. · Asset Inventory: Knowing what data and systems you have is crucial for assessing risk. Taking Action: · Risk Mitigation Strategies: Implement controls to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk. This could involve technical solutions, policy changes, or user awareness training. · Risk Transfer: In some cases, transferring risk through insurance might be appropriate. · Risk Acceptance: For certain low-impact risks, accepting the risk might be the most cost-effective solution. The Continuous Loop: · Regular Reviews: The risk landscape is constantly evolving, so ongoing assessments and adjustments are crucial. · Lessons Learned: Analyze past incidents to improve your risk management practices. · Communication & Awareness: Keep stakeholders informed about identified risks and implemented mitigation strategies. Effective risk management is the cornerstone of a secure organization. By proactively identifying and mitigating threats, you can build a resilient digital fortress. #Cybersecurity #RiskManagement

  • View profile for Pan Wu
    Pan Wu Pan Wu is an Influencer

    Senior Data Science Manager at Meta

    51,338 followers

    Personal data is highly sensitive information we entrust to internet companies, and strong regulations require these companies to handle it safely and reliably to meet security, privacy, and compliance standards. In this tech blog, Airbnb’s data science team shares how they built a data classification workflow to establish a unified strategy for identifying and classifying data across all data stores. The workflow is built on three pillars: Catalog, Detection, and Reconciliation. The Catalog pillar focuses on creating a dynamic and accurate system to identify where data resides and organize it into a comprehensive inventory. Detection addresses the question: what data might be considered personal? This step involves a detection engine structured as a pipeline to scan, validate, and control thresholds for surfacing detected results. Finally, Reconciliation ensures accurate classification by involving data owners in a human-in-the-loop process to confirm or refine detected classifications. Given the complexity of the system, the team developed metrics to assess its quality. These metrics—recall, precision, and speed—evaluate how effectively, accurately, and efficiently the classification system operates, ensuring it safeguards personal data over the long term. Additionally, the team shares strategies for governing data classification early in the process, along with best practices for improving workflows. These insights provide a clear understanding of not only the metrics but also actionable ways to enhance classification systems. Highly recommended reading for anyone interested in data governance and security. #datascience #personal #data #governance #classification #metrics – – –  Check out the "Snacks Weekly on Data Science" podcast and subscribe, where I explain in more detail the concepts discussed in this and future posts:    -- Spotify: https://lnkd.in/gKgaMvbh   -- Apple Podcast: https://lnkd.in/gj6aPBBY    -- Youtube: https://lnkd.in/gcwPeBmR https://lnkd.in/gqxuQ29E

  • View profile for Girish Redekar

    Co-Founder at Sprinto | 2x Founder | GRC | Infosec | Breeze through security compliances

    15,661 followers

    To protect your customers' data effectively, you must start by gaining a comprehensive understanding of the data you're safeguarding. This involves going beyond a surface-level awareness of its sensitivity. Instead, you should delve into the specifics of the data you handle, categorizing it based on its nature. For instance, the data could fall into categories like Protected Health Information (PHI), Personally Identifiable Information (PII), or cardholder information. It's crucial to pinpoint the exact kind of data you're processing. To achieve this, we recommend a more precise approach. Begin by identifying the data types within your ecosystem and tracing their origins. Create a visual map that outlines the sources of this data, building a clear understanding of your customers and the data they provide. By comprehending the paths data takes within your system, you can establish a more robust data protection strategy. In summary, by categorizing and deeply understanding the data you handle, as well as mapping its flow within your organization, you can develop a more effective and tailored approach to protect your customers' data.

  • View profile for Hemang Doshi

    Next100 CIO Awardee, IT Leadership, Building Resilient Global Infrastructures, Cyber Security, Audit Compliance, Cloud, Digital Transformation, Technology AI Evangelist, Strategic Planning, P&L Owner

    9,325 followers

    Why Identity Access Management Is Critical for Modern Enterprises Identity Access Management (IAM) is the vital part of any robust security architecture - especially as traditional perimeters dissolve in today’s distributed environments. For technical leaders and practitioners, effective IAM isn’t just about authentication. It’s about implementing continuous, granular controls that adapt to organizational change and emerging risk. Key pillars include: User Access Reconciliation: Regular alignment of granted permissions with actual entitlements in critical systems is non-negotiable. Automated and periodic reconciliation detects orphaned accounts and excessive privileges, reducing attack surfaces. Privileged Access Management (PAM): High-risk accounts with broad capabilities must be tightly governed. PAM enforces strict controls such as just-in-time elevation, session monitoring, and audit trails to protect sensitive assets from exploitation. Timely Access Revocation: When users change roles or exit, immediate deprovisioning is crucial. Delays can leave dormant accounts vulnerable to misuse or compromise. Automated workflows ensure access rights are always in sync with current employment status and responsibilities. Principle of Least Privilege: Users should have the minimal access needed to perform their functions - nothing more. This foundational control limits exposure and contains lateral movement in case of breaches. Periodic Role Transition Audits: Role transitions are inevitable. Regular reviews of access entitlements ensure that evolving responsibilities are matched by appropriate authorizations, preventing privilege creep and segregation-of-duty violations. In a zero-trust era, identity is the new perimeter. Mature IAM programs employ multifactor authentication, continuous role audits, and real-time response to changes, providing both agility and security at enterprise scale. #IAM #CyberSecurity #IdentityManagement #PAM #ZeroTrust

  • View profile for Wil Klusovsky

    Cybersecurity Advisor to Executives & Boards | Turning Cyber Risk Into Clear Business Decisions | Public Speaker | Host of The Keyboard Samurai Podcast

    22,704 followers

    Most vulnerability management programs are just… scanning. And the CEO thinks they’re “covered.” I’ve sat with too many executives who believed: “We scan. We patch. We do a yearly pentest. We’re good.” Then something small turned into something expensive. 🧙🏼♂️This is how you prevent a $3M incident from starting as a $1k misconfiguration. Here’s what a real Vulnerability Management program should look Program Management → You can't manage this without people, they need to be on top of everything going on. → Every risk has an owner, a deadline, and a business decision attached. → Without this, findings sit in dashboards. You need a risk register for anything delayed or accepted. Attack Surface Management → You must look beyond your walls and see your business from their POV → Finds exposed assets you didn’t know were there → If attackers can see it, it’s in scope. You need continuous external discovery, not a once-a-year review. DevSecOps → If you write code, it needs to be tested, safe and not just once pre-production. → Prevents new weaknesses from being built into software before release. → Security checks must be part of dev, not bolted on after launch. Continuous Pentesting → Just like the dashboard lights on your car, they don't just check once a year. → Tests are always running to catch risks before attackers do. → Your world changes. Validation has to keep up, not wait for next year’s report. Red Team → A standard test kicks in the door, this is sneaky sneaky real.  → Simulates a real attacker moving quietly over time to find gaps. → This tests maturity. It tests detection, response, and leadership visibility. Context & Threat Intel → Without context everything is "critical," you want to prioritize to reduce efforts long term. → Focuses on weaknesses attackers are actually using, not just what exists. → Your business is not every business. Pentesting (Point in Time) → You need skilled and creative people to put your protection to the test. → Shows how attackers break in and what damage they can do. → Validate controls and reset assumptions. It’s a snapshot, not a strategy. Patch & Remediation Management → Finding all this issues means nothing if you don't fix them. Lots of people power needed here. → Fixes known weaknesses fast to reduce downtime and breach risk. → Measure time-to-fix, enforce deadlines, escalate delays. Otherwise “critical” becomes normal. Vulnerability Scanning → This is day 1 stuff ignoring this is like leaving your front door open. → Finds known weaknesses across your systems. → Scan consistently across servers, endpoints, cloud, and apps. If you’re a business leader you need to understand:  Vulnerability management is not a security activity. It’s a risk decision system. Most companies won’t mature past scanning. The ones that do outperform in resilience, deal confidence, and audit outcomes. 💾 Save this as your benchmark. 🔁 Repost for other leaders who think scanning equals protection.

Explore categories