Skip to main content
Log in

Whitish film covering a newborn white shark was not intrauterine material but embryonic epithelium

  • Published:
Image Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We provide an alternative interpretation for the “whitish film” that covered the young white shark observed with an aerial drone in a paper published recently (Gauna and Sternes, Environ Biol Fish 107:249–254, 2024). The paper claimed that this whitish film was a leftover intrauterine substance (e.g., uterine milk, which is a maternal secretion to nourish embryos), thus suggesting that the individual was a newborn. However, we are skeptical of this interpretation for the following reasons: (1) our previous studies showed that the secretion of intrauterine substances in white sharks ceases in mid-gestation and, (2) even if the secretion continues until birth, the substance is unlikely to be retained on the skin for a long time after birth. Based on data from Lamna ditropis, a close relative of the white shark, we hypothesize that the whitish film is an embryonic epithelium that covers the surface of skin denticles. This reinterpretation does not alter but reinforces the major conclusion of (Gauna and Sternes, Environ Biol Fish 107:249–254, 2024) that the individual sighted is a newborn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
ImageThe alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Data availability

Data is available upon request.

References

  • Gauna C, Sternes PC (2024) Novel aerial observations of a possible newborn white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) in Southern California. Environ Biol Fish 107:249–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlett WC, Musick JA, Eulitt AM, Jarrell RL, Kelly MA (1996) Ultrastructure of uterine trophonemata, accommodation for uterolactation, and gas exchange in the southern stingray, Dasyatis americana. Can J Zool 74:1417–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimley AP (1985) The areal distribution and autoecology of the white shark Carcharodon carcharias off the west coast of North America. Mem South Calif Acad Sci 9:15–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato K, Nakamura M, Tomita T, Toda M, Miyamoto J, Nozu R (2016) How great white sharks nourish their embryos to a large size: evidence of lipid histrotrophy lamnoid shark reproduction. Biol Open 5:1211–1215

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomita T, Nozu R, Nakamura M, Matsuzaki S, Miyamoto K, Sato K (2017) Live-bearing without placenta: physical estimation indicates the high oxygen-supplying ability of white shark uterus to the embryo. Sci Rep 7:11744

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomita T, Nakamura M, Nozu R, Ogawa N, Toda M, Sato K (2022) Mode of uterine milk secretion in the white shark. Anat Rec 305:1724–1731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the following for providing access to the salmon shark specimen at the Kesennuma Fish Market: the Kesennuma Fishery Cooperative and Yoji Niinuma and other staff at the Kesennuma Shark Museum. We also thank Ryo Nozu (Hiroshima University) for helping to collect the salmon shark specimens. This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant number 17K18451).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TT, KeM, MN, KiM, MT, and KS conducted the necropsy of pregnant white shark specimens. TT and KeM performed the necropsy of a pregnant salmon shark specimen. MN conducted a histological analysis of the embryonic skin of salmon sharks. TT wrote the manuscript. TT, KeM, MN, KiM, MT, and KS reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taketeru Tomita.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

No live animal was used in this study.

Consent to participate

All authors agreed to participate.

Competing interests

Dr. Keiichi Sato is on the Editorial Board of this journal, but he had no involvement in the peer review of this article and had no access to information regarding its peer review.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomita, T., Miyamoto, K., Nakamura, M. et al. Whitish film covering a newborn white shark was not intrauterine material but embryonic epithelium. Environ Biol Fish 107, 719–722 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-024-01560-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-024-01560-z

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Keiichi Sato