14
\$\begingroup\$

I was reading Audio Power Amplifier Design Handbook, Fifth Edition, from Douglas Self. I did not see any MOSFET circuits in that book.

Is there any reason why BJTs are used mostly in audio amplifiers?

Will MOSFETs give the same or better performance as BJTs in audio applications?

\$\endgroup\$

4 Answers 4

14
\$\begingroup\$

When MOSFETs were first introduced, there was a flurry of excitement amongst audio engineers. Class AB BJT output stages tended to have bad crossover distortion, which was ascribed to their sharpish turn on characteristic. FETs were more like valves, with their gentler turn on, and voltage rather than current drive, and so many class AB designs were done with them.

Unfortunately, MOSFETs have a tempco that changes sign with Vgs. When using them as switching devices with high Vgs, their positive tempco means they not only share current nicely between devices, but distribute it nicely across the die. When used in the linear region with low Vgs however, they are inclined to thermally run away. If you try to use a standard MOSFET in the linear region, you must derate it very heavily. Very few FETs have a 'DC' curve in their second breakdown graph. There are 'designed for linear' MOSFETs, but they are very expensive, and not very available. BJT's are just more robust, especially when you push your amplifier to '11'.

Crossover distortion has less to do with the turn on characteristic, and more to do with how it's controlled. Once amplifier design caught up with using BJT's properly, FETs offered no advantages, and designers stopped trying to build linear amplifiers with them.

Class D is of course quite recent history, and there fast switching MOSFETs are a perfect fit.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Actually quite a lot of MOSFETs do. SuperJunction and now even SiC types tend to have full DC SOA. Trench (<200V Si) types tend not to, for which you need to look into the older (planar) types. Or the "linear" types as such (which are just the modern iteration of planar). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 2 at 17:14
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Conversely, BJTs always have 2nd breakdown, it's just a matter of when. (To put the finest point on it: this is true of absolutely anything, FET or BJT. Both have NTC linear range and thus potential for instability.) There are fewer BJTs with much SOA (but there are fewer power BJTs these days in general), and those few for power amp service are specifically tailored. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 2 at 17:30
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What about MOSFETs for class A designs? I remember a road-weary sound engineer extolling the virtues of MOSFET power amps and I think he was talking about class A circuits \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 5 at 1:47
17
\$\begingroup\$

As well as more predictable biasing and lower cost as discrete components, BJTs generally introduce less voltage noise than MOSFETs, both 1/f noise and white noise. Older MOSFETs were particularly bad for noise and drift.

From Trade-offs Between CMOS, JFET, and Bipolar Input Stage Technology is a comparison of modern relatively high-end integrated circuit op-amps with BJT, JFET and MOSFET front ends:

enter image description here

One of the original MOSFET-input op-amps, the CA3140, has a typical noise density of 40nV/√Hz at 1kHz vs 5nV/√Hz for a bipolar NE5532. It's not too hard to get voltage noise density in the 1nV/√Hz range with bipolar or discrete JFET transistors.

Current noise is less for MOSFETs and JFETs, of course, but audio circuits tend to be low impedance, so voltage noise dominates.

\$\endgroup\$
7
\$\begingroup\$

You need to put into context why there are no FET circuits in the book.

This is basically a history question.

That 5th edition is 17 years old book from 2009.

The 1st edition came out 30 years ago in 1996.

The author started to work on audio amplifiers about 50 years ago approximately in 1975.

The only sensible components to do audio amplifiers back then were BJTs. When suitable FETs started to be available, they would be more expensive, more sensitive to their operating conditions, required more complex and more expensive circuitry around them, and simply put the whole FET circuit would look very different from a BJT circuit.

If you have already years of experience how to do good enough amplifiers that are simple, easy and robust for the required purpose with BJTs, there are not much reasons to use FETs.

So if you rarely use FETs, you might not have the same experience using them, might not have suitable well working circuits or building blocks that use them, so you also don't write about FET circuits in your book.

\$\endgroup\$
0
5
\$\begingroup\$

May I know is there any reason why BJT is used mostly in Audio Amplifiers.

To firmly activate a BJT, the required base-emitter voltage is about 0.8 volts. Compare this to a MOSFET where it might be a few volts between gate and source.

Then consider that the power driver for an audio amplifier is dominated by a "voltage follower" push-pull stage. This means that the BJT output can swing to within a volt of either power rail whereas for a MOSFET stage (source follower), the equivalent is 2 or 3 volts and, back in the 1980s or 1990s it might have been 5 to 8 volts.

So, the MOSFET is/was not favoured compared to the BJT because it couldn't deliver the power on a simple power rail.

Will MOSFET also give same or better performance as BJT in Audio applications?

Well, you would have to fix the problem mentioned above first. This can be done with an auxiliary supply used for driving the MOSFETs that might be 5 volts higher (negatively as well as positively) beyond the main power rails.

Once this is done I see no reasons why equivalent performance couldn't be achieved.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Why MOSFETs? Why not ordinary JFETs in an audio design? I've used these years ago with great results! I've also recently implemented high dynamic range RF amplifiers using old-style "pentode tube" style designs using, instead of a pentode, a pair of FETs in cascode configuration: the FETs provided a voltage controlled current source with high input and output impedances (like a pentode), very low output to input coupling (stable with tuned inputs and outputs), and good linearity--not to mention very low noise with the right choice of FETs. Use source bias resistors to control current. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 4 at 6:47
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @ScientificConsultants - Hi, You commented "Why MOSFETs?" - the OP's question specifically asked about them :) Therefore if you want to add your experiences on something else (i.e. JFETs) that would be better as a comment on the question instead. More people will see it and it's more relevant there. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 4 at 13:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.