Enhancement: Better detection of pip-requirement files

[blfpd]

The definition in package.json of pip-requirements could be improved and simplified in filenamePatterns.

At the moment, it does not recognize out of the box the following files, which are quite common in Django projects (before the Poetry era though):

requirements/
├── base.txt
├── prod.txt
└── dev.txt

[karthiknadig]

I see that you already have a PR. But we really want to see what the community says on this. The reason we want to wait is if this is not a common pattern or if it can mark files that users did not intend to be marked as pip-requirements file.

We are going to give the community 60 days from when this issue was created to provide 7 👍 upvotes on the opening comment to gauge general interest in this idea. If there's enough upvotes then we will consider this feature request in our future planning. If there's unfortunately not enough upvotes then we will close this issue.

[brettcannon]

I'm going to skip the voting period based on the fact Twitter implicitly voted enough for this. 😄

[blfpd]

Did they? 😆 Do you have the tweet link close-by?

[brettcannon]

@batisteo https://twitter.com/brettsky/status/1491863712721866753