Trends In Structural Engineering

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Craig Scroggie
    Craig Scroggie Craig Scroggie is an Influencer

    CEO & MD, NEXTDC | AI infrastructure, energy systems, sovereignty

    44,763 followers

    For most of the last century, generators stabilised the grid as a by-product of producing energy. Today, we are building assets that stabilise the grid without producing energy at all. That shift identifies the binding constraint. Electricity system transition is no longer constrained by renewable resource availability. It is constrained by deliverability and operability. In inverter-dominated systems under rapid load growth, the binding constraints are: - transmission and major substation capacity - system strength, fault levels, frequency and voltage control - connection and commissioning throughput - secure operation under worst-day conditions - execution pace across networks and system services Generation capacity remains necessary. On its own, it no longer delivers firm supply or supports large new loads. Historically, synchronous generators supplied energy and stability together. Inertia, fault current, voltage support, and controllability were implicit. As synchronous plant retires, these services must be provided explicitly. Stability shifts from physics-led to control-led. System behaviour becomes more sensitive to modelling accuracy, protection coordination, control settings, and real-time visibility. Curtailment is not excess energy. It is a deliverability or security constraint. When transmission and substations lag generation, congestion and curtailment rise. Independent analysis shows that delay increases prices and emissions by extending reliance on higher-cost thermal generation. Distribution networks are no longer passive. They now host distributed generation, storage, EV charging, and large loads at the edge of transmission. Voltage control, protection coordination, hosting capacity, and connection throughput now constrain both decarbonisation and industrial growth. Firming is a hard requirement. Batteries provide fast frequency response and contingency arrest. They do not provide multi-day energy and do not replace networks or system strength in weak grids. Demand response reduces peaks. It cannot be relied upon for system-wide security under stress. Execution speed is critical. Slow delivery increases congestion duration, curtailment exposure, reserve requirements, and reliance on ageing plant. These effects flow directly into costs, emissions, and reliability. This is why electricity bills can rise even when average wholesale prices fall. Costs are driven by peak demand, contingencies, and security, not average energy. Large digital and industrial loads are transmission-scale, continuous, and failure-intolerant. They increase contingency size and correlation risk. At that scale, loads do not connect to the grid, they shape it. Supporting growth requires time-to-power, transmission and substation capacity in load corridors, explicit system strength and fault levels, operable firming under worst-day conditions, scalable connection and commissioning, and early procurement of long lead time HV equipment. #energy

  • View profile for Bruno M.

    AI Integrator for AEC | Implementing AI workflows across BIM, documents, and reporting | Founder, Digital Flow | BIM Manager @ MCORM

    7,756 followers

    The BIM Monolith is Becoming Obsolete For decades, our industry relied on a single BIM tool to design and build. But the cracks are showing. New startups, AI-driven workflows, and API-first tools are breaking the “one-size-fits-all” approach—replacing it with a connected ecosystem of specialized apps that is ever growing. The future of BIM won’t be about one tool to rule them all. It will be about orchestration: ✅ Concept tools built from intelligent components ✅ AI agents automating QC, drawings, and clash detection ✅ Open data giving firms control of their own project information The monolith era is ending. The ecosystem era is here. How is your firm preparing for this shift?

  • AI data centers are becoming grid assets — not just loads. Utilities are tightening requirements faster than developers can adapt. The next wave of hyperscale development will require a hybrid grid-support stack just to achieve rapid interconnection. “The hyperscale campus of the future will bring its own inertia, VAR stability, and ramp control.” ⚡️ The New Grid Reality for Hyperscale AI-scale campuses (100–500 MW, 80–200 kW/rack) no longer behave like traditional IT loads. They generate fast ramps, sub-second variability, harmonics, and voltage sensitivity. In many nodes, this looks less like a “typical customer” and more like a converter-dominated industrial plant. Utilities and TSOs are already responding with stricter technical requirements: • Tighter Power Quality (PQ) limits (harmonics, flicker, voltage deviations) • EMT modelling (sub-cycle electromagnetic transient analysis) • Ramp-rate caps (MW/min load-change limits) • VAR obligations at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) (reactive-power performance) The bar is rising fast. Here’s how the industry is adapting: 1️⃣ STATCOMs — the Core of Modern VAR & PQ Performance STATCOMs are becoming essential for AI-ready campuses: • Millisecond reactive-power response • Voltage stabilization on weak nodes • Flicker and harmonic mitigation • Dynamic support during rapid load changes Hybrid angle: Many deployments now integrate STATCOM + BESS under one coordinated control layer. 2️⃣ BESS — From Backup System to Ramp-Shaping Engine Battery Energy Storage Systems are evolving into strategic grid assets. They can: • Cap MW/min ramps • Smooth sub-second GPU variability • Support fault-ride-through requirements • Reshape AI load curves for grid compatibility Impact: A 200 MW AI cluster becomes significantly easier for utilities to manage. 3️⃣ Synchronous Condensers — Inertia & Short-Circuit Strength In weak or inverter-dominated grids, synchronous condensers provide: • Real inertia • Higher short-circuit strength (SCR) • Improved transient and angle stability • Reduced FIDVR risk In practice: bringing your own short-circuit power to the PCC. 📌 Implications for Developers & Investors ➡️ Interconnection packages are shifting. Expect utilities to require hybrid systems, especially where SCR is low. ➡️ Faster time-to-energization. Stronger grid-support design reduces system risk, accelerates studies, and improves negotiation leverage. ➡️ Delays are expensive. Months of delay on a 300–500 MW AI campus carry enormous financial consequences. Hybrid VAR, inertia, and ramp-shaping solutions buy time — and time is value. #DataCenters #GridStability #STATCOM #BESS #SynchronousCondenser #Hyperscale #PowerQuality #EnergySystems #AIInfrastructure #Interconnection

  • View profile for Andreas Bach

    Executive Interim & Advisory | EPC Execution & Delivery for IPPs / PE Platforms | PV & BESS

    14,806 followers

    In discussions I often get pulled into the same argument: “We need baseload. We need baseload.” And I keep asking myself: for whom, really? The classic example: aluminum smelters or steel plants running 24/7. But let’s be honest, these industries only relied on baseload because that’s what the system offered. The grid set the supply, industry adapted. Today, the system is different. Generation from solar and wind is variable. Technologies like battery storage, demand response, and flexible consumers are no longer future concepts, they’re here. Grid operators no longer plan around “baseload vs. peak load,” but around flexibility and adequacy. And it will be the same again: so-called “baseload industries” will adapt to a system optimized for flexibility, not locked into inflexible generation. So the real question is no longer: How do we secure baseload? But rather: How do we build the flexibility that ensures power is always there when it’s needed? Maybe the new mantra is: Flexibility is the new baseload. 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱 – 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘀 & 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘴: → Continuous supply (24/7 availability) → Low variable costs when running at full load (coal, nuclear) → Planning certainty for certain industries 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴: → Very inflexible, slow to react to demand changes → Blocks renewable integration → curtailment, negative prices → High fixed costs & very long construction times 𝗙𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 – 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘀 & 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘴: → Matches both generation and demand dynamically → Enables high shares of renewables → Supports new consumers (heat pumps, EVs, electrolysers) 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴: → Greater system complexity in planning & operation → Reliance on digital infrastructure and market design → Higher upfront costs for storage, grids, and integration 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱 When millions of heat pumps, EVs and electrolysers are connected, our grid will no longer be built around a static baseload. It will thrive on flexibility, in both generation and demand. With EVs, heat pumps and electrolysers everywhere, do we still need baseload, or do we need smarter flexibility?

  • View profile for Md Suruj Ali

    Renewable Energy I Project Design I Project Management I Feasibility Study I Energy Efficiency I Power System I EPC I Develop I Commercial I Utility I IPP I Solar I Wind I ESS

    2,266 followers

    Grid Integration Challenges for Renewable Energy — Why the Future Grid Must Be Smarter ⚡ As solar PV and wind power grow at record speed, one thing is clear: our traditional grid was not designed for renewable-dominant energy systems. High renewable penetration brings incredible potential—along with new technical challenges that engineers and regulators must solve together. Here are the core challenges: 1. Variability & Unpredictability Solar and wind fluctuate within minutes, creating continuous balancing challenges and requiring faster, more flexible grid control. 2. Voltage & Frequency Instability Traditional grids rely on large synchronous generators that naturally stabilize voltage and frequency. But today, as more inverter-based renewables connect: 🔹Voltage rises and dips become more frequent 🔹Frequency stability weakens without mechanical inertia 🔹System operators face tighter balancing requirements 3. Reverse Power Flow from Distributed PV Rooftop and community solar now push power back into the grid, Instead of power flowing from grid → consumer, we now see frequent consumer → grid feedback. 🔹Transformer stress 🔹Protection miscoordination 🔹Feeder overloading 4. Grid Congestion & Hosting Capacity Limits Aging distribution lines were never built for thousands of microgenerators. Result: feeder congestion, curtailment, and voltage violations during sunny hours. 5. Low Inertia in Renewable-Dominant Grids Inverter-based renewables lack natural inertia, increasing the risk of: 🔹Rapid frequency swings 🔹Poor fault ride-through 🔹Cascading instability Solutions like synthetic inertia and grid-forming inverters are becoming essential. 6. Outdated Infrastructure & Slow Regulatory Updates Legacy grid codes and planning methods still assume centralized fossil generation. We need updated standards, smarter protection, and new interconnection rules. 7. Need for Smart Grids, Storage & Digital Control The clean-energy future requires: 🔹BESS 🔹Smart inverters 🔹IoT-based monitoring 🔹AI forecasting & optimization 🔹Flexible loads & demand response 🔹Microgrids and hybrid systems These technologies transform variability into stability and turn distributed generators into active grid assets. 💡 The Future: A Smart, Flexible, Hybrid Grid Research and global experience show that the solution isn’t just reinforcing the grid — it’s digitizing it. The more renewables we add, the smarter our grid must become, and this transition is already accelerating across the world. #RenewableEnergy #SmartGrid #GridIntegration #CleanEnergy #EnergyTransition #SustainableEnergy #SolarPV #WindEnergy #EnergyStorage #Microgrids #InverterTechnology #DigitalGrid #EnergyInnovation #FutureOfEnergy #Decarbonization

  • View profile for Ryan Quint

    Founder | CEO | Thought Leader | Change Agent | Energy Transition Innovator | Grid Reliability Advocate

    8,695 followers

    California has achieved 100 days meeting 100% of its demand with wind, water, and solar resources only. Only the water (hydro) is synchronous - the rest is inverter-based (#IBR). This trend is happening all over the US and around the world. High IBR conditions are here; they are not a future problem. The "future" challenges we talked about 5 years ago are now here today, and we collectively as an industry must keep pace with this rapid change in terms of #interconnection, #planning, #engineering, #operations, and #systemrestoration. Grid challenges that are evolving/growing with increasing IBRs: - System strength changes and weak grid impacts - Variability and uncertainty in planning and operations - IBR controls stability and oscillations - Need for electromagnetic transient (EMT) modeling and studies - Forensic analysis and sharing lessons learned - Regulatory lag and the need to move more proactively - Need for forward looking scenario-based transmission planning - Impacts to protection systems - Fully leveraging the full suite of services and capabilities from modern IBRs IBRs and renewables are not a "bad actor" that require risk mitigations. The narrative needs to change to IBRs being a resource rich in capabilities that must be fully leveraged in concert with system-level solutions that help ensure a reliable and stable grid today and moving forward. Elevate Energy Consulting Source: https://lnkd.in/gs3678BV

  • View profile for Claire Rowland

    Building products that make clean energy technology work for real people | Lead author, Designing Connected Products (O’Reilly)

    3,447 followers

    🏠⚡ Real-world smart meter data reveals how heat pumps, EVs, solar, and battery are reshaping electricity demand ⚡🏠 New analysis from Energy Systems Catapult's Living Lab shows how low-carbon technologies - solar, battery, EVs, and heat pumps - are fundamentally changing residential energy consumption patterns. Using smart meter data from hundreds of UK homes with different combinations of these technologies, my colleague Will Rowe uncovered the following patterns: 🚗 EVs: Demand shifting for time of use tariffs * Peak charging occurs between midnight-6am, showing consumers respond to time-of-use tariffs * Winter demand jumps 34% vs summer - critical for network planning during peak periods ♨️ Heat pumps: Flexible but weather-dependent * Two distinct daily peaks (3:30-6:30 and 12:30-15:30) indicate smart tariff optimisation * Summer consumption indicates ~75 litres hot water usage per household daily * Significant load-shifting capability suggests potential for demand response ☀️ Solar + batteries: Grid relief with seasonal patterns * Homes consistently show lower daily grid consumption across three seasons * Summer sees reduced overnight charging as solar-battery synergy maximises self-consumption * Clear evidence of energy arbitrage behaviour 🌆 The bigger picture:  Consumer behaviour demonstrates strong price responsiveness, but all technologies show pronounced seasonal variation. Winter represents the critical design case for network capacity planning. 🗞️ What this means:  As LCT adoption accelerates, understanding these real consumption patterns becomes essential for network reinforcement, generation planning, and designing future flexibility markets. Read the full analysis: https://lnkd.in/eDGhnjUm Want access to real-world energy data? The Living Lab's 5,000+ households are helping derisk clean energy innovation via sharing data and taking part in trials of new energy technologies. Contact our team via https://lnkd.in/ehQUnw2Y to discuss how we can help you. #EnergyTransition #HeatPumps #ElectricVehicles #SolarPower #NetZero #EnergyData #Decarbonisation

  • View profile for PS Lee

    Head of NUS Mechanical Engineering & Executive Director of ESI | Expert in Sustainable AI Data Center Cooling | Keynote Speaker and Board Member

    51,338 followers

    🔌🔥 How to Future-Proof Data Centers for 600–1000 kW Racks in the Age of AI The real disruption isn’t just AI chips—it’s the infrastructure needed to power and cool them. As AI workloads explode, ultra-high-density racks of 600–1000 kW are fast approaching. Most data centers today operate at 6–30 kW/rack—one or two orders of magnitude lower. This isn’t just scaling—it’s transformation. And the time to prepare is now. Here’s how we future-proof with intention and agility. ⚡️ Power: Beyond Provisioning Next-gen data centers will become grid participants. High-voltage DC (400–800 V) cuts losses and space compared to legacy AC cabling. On-site solar, hydrogen, fuel cells, and batteries will buffer peaks and boost resilience. Overhead busways and modular power skids will replace cable trays and PDUs. 💧 Cooling: Liquid-First by Design Air is no longer enough. Liquid cooling is essential. Direct-to-chip cold plates and two-phase systems will handle rising heat flux. Immersion cooling becomes practical for dense AI training loads. High-temperature water loops enable efficient heat rejection and reuse. In hot climates, sealed systems and desiccant cooling control dew points and corrosion. 🧠 Infrastructure That Thinks Smart facilities go beyond monitoring—they adapt. Digital twins and AI co-optimize thermal and power flows in real time. Predictive analytics detect anomalies in pumps, chillers, and batteries. DCIM systems will optimize compute placement for thermal efficiency. 🏗️ Rack and Server Reinvention Racks become active infrastructure. Integrated CDUs, DC busbars, and thermal sensors as standard. Cold plates cool CPUs, GPUs, and memory as TDPs exceed 1000 W. AI inference at the edge will drive smaller, dense, liquid-cooled deployments outside hyperscale. 🗺️ Climate-Aware Engineering Design must be climate-contingent: Tropics: No free cooling? Go sealed, high-temp liquid loops with advanced dew-point control. Temperate: Leverage economizers and district heating with heat pumps. Local energy mix and regulations (e.g., heat reuse mandates) will shape design choices. 🧩 What to Do Now ✅ Oversize backbone power and chilled water loops ✅ Deploy rear-door heat exchangers and prepare for cold plate retrofits ✅ Build headroom into spatial, electrical, and fluidic layouts ✅ Begin with modular, liquid-ready zones—even if not activated yet ✅ Instrument, simulate, and learn from every watt and every °C 🧭 Final Thought We are entering the era of co-designed digital infrastructure—where power, cooling, compute, and control converge. The smartest racks won’t just house AI. They’ll embody it. Because the future isn’t just about denser chips—it’s about smarter infrastructure. #AIInfrastructure #DataCenters #LiquidCooling #FutureOfCompute #GreenIT #ThermalManagement #DirectToChip #SmartBuildings #SustainableAI #HeatReuse #HighDensityComputing #PowerAndCooling #DigitalTwin #ImmersionCooling #TropicalDataCenters Image credit: DALL.E

  • View profile for Ibrahim AlMohaisin

    Electrical Engineering Consultant | SMIEEE |Shaping Engineering Leaders | Empowering Technical Talent | Renewable Energy | Mentor, Trainer & Advisory Board Member| Vice Chair of the Board of AEEE

    11,980 followers

    Following the wide recognition of Grid-Forming (GFM) inverters as a cornerstone for grid stability, the focus of innovation is rapidly shifting from “forming” the grid to actively orchestrating it. The next frontier blends intelligence, adaptability, and cross-domain interaction — pushing power systems into what experts now call the Grid 3.0 era. Here’s where research and advanced practice are heading : ① Multi-Mode & Hybrid-Compatible Inverters (HC-GFIs) Next-gen converters can seamlessly operate in GFM or GFL modes depending on system strength — enhancing flexibility and resilience under changing conditions (Nature Scientific Reports, 2025; ArXiv Energy Systems, 2024). ② Unified AC/DC & Dual-Port Architectures Dual-port inverters are enabling hybrid microgrids, dynamically balancing AC and DC power flows to integrate solar, storage, and EV systems with unprecedented efficiency. ③ Wide-Area Damping via PMU-Driven Control Using synchronized phasor measurements and edge computing, wide-area damping control (WADC) coordinates multiple GFMs, HVDC links, and FACTS devices — achieving real-time system stabilization even in weak grids. ④ Digital, Predictive & AI-Assisted Operations AI-enabled predictive control is now being used to anticipate voltage instabilities, optimize inertia emulation, and coordinate fleets of distributed GFMs (NREL Digital Twin Grid Initiative, 2024). ⑤ Virtual Power Plants (VPPs) & Hydrogen-Linked Storage Thousands of GFMs, EVs, and hydrogen fuel systems are being aggregated into Virtual Power Plants capable of grid support, black-start, and ancillary services at national scale. ▪️In essence: we’re evolving from grid-forming to grid-intelligent systems — adaptive, self-healing, and data-driven. The future grid will not only be stable; it will be strategically aware. #GridForming #GridIntelligence #PowerSystems #BESS #HybridGrids #AIinEnergy #VPP #EnergyTransition #IEEE_PES

  • View profile for Thomas Kiessling

    Founder | CEO | Clean Tech & IoT

    3,544 followers

    🌍 Reflecting on the Future of #EnergyDistribution at the World Economic Forum 🌍 Honored to discuss at the World Economic Forum’s Clean Power Executive group last week, on the urgent steps needed to strengthen our energy distribution grid amidst today’s surge toward #electrification. As we accelerate #ElectricVehicles, #heatpumps, #industrialelectrification and #renewables, our #grid faces unprecedented strain, leading to overloads, connection delays, and stability issues. Here’s what we believe will drive meaningful change: Regulatory Shift to #Totex and the right pricing signals 💼 We must shift from rigid Capex models to Totex, allowing Distribution Grid Operators to prioritize flexible, digital investments. In Europe, the 2024 Electricity Market Design Directive is a step forward, but we need faster national implementation. On pricing, we need to move from a long term Capex, ‘cost plus’ model, to a dynamic pricing model, both in retail and wholesale markets, to signal investment needed to solve congestion at the points where it occurs.  Scaling #Flexibility Markets 🔄 Flexibility markets are a key enabler for an efficient distribution grid. They could cut grid investment needs by up to 20%, at the same time accelerating renewable rollout. First flexibility market implementations in Europe and North America show potential – now it is time to scale them. Data Accessibility 📊 Without much improved availability and quality of data in lower distribution grid voltage levels, flexibility markets, grid efficiency, shorter interconnection backlogs, and effective investment planning will be very difficult to achieve. Following progressive examples in the UK and elsewhere, we recommend data frameworks, adoption of standards, and data availability in the distribution grid to be required in all national regulations.  Addressing #PowerElectronics Challenges ⚙️ The rise of volatile solar and wind based power generation and the move to a largely power electronics controlled energy grid introduces fundamental control and stability issues. Industry-wide collaboration on technical standards and simulation of large scale inverter based grids is key to a resilient grid. We’re at a pivotal moment. Through regulatory evolution, flexible markets, robust data, and innovative tech, we can build a sustainable energy future. 🌍 #WEF2024 #EnergyTransition #SustainableEnergy

Explore categories