User talk:Sbmeirow
Add topic| This is Sbmeirow's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sbmeirow. |
 |
|---|
| 16 September 2026 |
|
Menu
[edit]Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit] | This discussion has been disrupted by block evasion, ban evasion, or sockpuppetry from the following user:
Their comments should be excluded from assessments of consensus. |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Johnny Joeson (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Johnny Joeson banned for sockpuppetry
[edit]As you've probably seen, User:Johnny Joeson has been banned as a sockpuppet. Turns out you were right after all!
You're probably already be familiar with this, but just in case, I thought I should copy it here:
Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a ban or block, without giving any further reason; such reverts are also exempt from being counted under the three-revert rule. This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made in violation of a block or ban (changes that are obviously helpful, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert.
(from WP:BLOCKREVERT)
I've already undone some of their changes to Exact Audio Copy. Thanks, CommonsKiwi (talk) 08:12, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for this comment! It appears that User:Johnny Joeson was likely one of numerous sockpuppets of User:Raxythecat, per Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Raxythecat, and per numerous sockpuppet investigations at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raxythecat/Archive. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 04:18, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Unexplained restoration of unnecessary disambiguation on township articles
[edit]I noticed that you undid a large number of removals of unnecessary disambiguation without explaining why that was done. Your reversions feature the edit summary "Revert to proper naming". However, this is directly in contradiction with the guideline WP:PLACENAME, specifically the section §Minor civil divisions, which reads as follows (emphasis mine): Per a successful 2023 Village Pump proposal, minor civil divisions, such as townships, the name of a minor civil division should follow the convention of Division, State, only including the relevant county of a division in between division and state if there are multiple divisions of the same name in a state.
Please undo your edits. I will continue moving articles to meet the standards of that guideline. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:46, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
