Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Image
Type: Article
Published: 2026-09-22
Page range: 428-436
Abstract views: 546
PDF downloaded: 17

Natural biogeographic regions of Mexico and Central America: Digital files of historical and modified regionalizations

Departamento de Biología Evolutiva; Facultad de Ciencias; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 04510 Mexico City; Mexico
Departamento de Biología Evolutiva; Facultad de Ciencias; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 04510 Mexico City; Mexico
Departamento de Biología Evolutiva; Facultad de Ciencias; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 04510 Mexico City; Mexico
Departamento de Biología Evolutiva; Facultad de Ciencias; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 04510 Mexico City; Mexico
Digital cartography digitalization Mesoamerica regionalization

Abstract

The natural regions of Mexico and Central America proposed by West (1964b) and subsequent modifications by Flores-Villela (1991, 1993) for Mexico have been widely used in anthropological and, particularly, biogeographical and herpetological studies. Despite their continued relevance, these regionalizations have not been previously available in a digital format suitable for modern geographic information systems. We present here the digitalization of both the original and modified cartographies of West’s natural regions as vector shapefiles. Additionally, we provide a comparative framework that relates West’s regionalization and its modifications with a recent biogeographical regionalization of Mexico and Central America. Because the original map was published at a relatively small scale, the boundaries should be considered approximations rather than precise geographic delineations. These resources contribute to the continued use and reinterpretation of a classic regionalization framework in contemporary biogeographical research.

References

  1. Campbell, J.A. (1999) Distribution patterns of Amphibians in Middle America. In: Duellman, W.E. (Ed.), Patterns of distribution of amphibians: A global perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 111–210.
  2. Davidson, W.V. & Parsons, J.J. (1980) Robert C. West, geographer. In: Davidson, W.V. & Parsons, J.J. (Eds.), Historical geography of Latin America: Papers in honor of Robert C. West. School of Geoscience, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, pp. 1–8.
  3. Domínguez-Domínguez, O. & Pérez-Ponce de León, G. (2009) ¿La mesa central de México es una provincia biogeográfica? Análisis descriptivo basado en componentes bióticos dulceacuícolas. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 80 (3), 835–852. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2009.003.178
  4. Escalante, T., Rodríguez-Tapia, G. & Morrone, J.J. (2021) Toward a biogeographic regionalization of the Nearctic region: Area nomenclature and digital map. Zootaxa, 5027 (3), 351–375. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5027.3.3
  5. Flannery, K.V. (1965) Natural environment and early cultures by Robert C. West. American Anthropologist, New Series, 67 (5), 1333–1336. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1965.67.5.02a00520
  6. Flores-Villela, O.A. (1991) Análisis de la distribución de la herpetofauna de México. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D. F., 269 pp. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]
  7. Flores-Villela, O.A. (1993) Herpetofauna mexicana. Carnegie Museum of Natural History Special Publication, Pittsburgh, 73 pp.
  8. Flores-Villela, O.A. & Goyenechea, I. (2001) A comparison of hypotheses of historical area relationships for Mexico and Central America, or in search for the lost pattern. In: Johnson, J.D., Webb, R.G. & Flores-Villela, O.A. (Eds.), Mesoamerican herpetology: Systematics, zoogeography, and conservation. Centennial Museum Special Publication No. 1. University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, pp. 171–181.
  9. FloresVillela, O. & Goyenechea, I. (2003) Patrones de distribución de anfibios y reptiles en México. In: Morrone, J.J. & Llorente Bousquets, J. (Eds.), Una perspectiva latinoamericana de la biogeografía. Las Prensas de Ciencias, Mexico City, pp. 289–296.
  10. Flores-Villela, O. & Martínez-Salazar, E.A. (2009) Historical explanation of the origin of the herpetofauna of Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 80 (3), 817–833. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2009.003.177
  11. Flores-Villela, O.A., Ríos-Muñoz, C.A. & Campbell, J.A. (in press) The Mexican landscape. In: Campbell, J.A., Flores-Villela, O.A. & Mendelson III, J.R. (Eds.), The Mexican Herpetofauna. Vol. 1. Amphibians. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 25–33.
  12. Goyenechea, I. & Flores-Villela, O.A. (2003) Introducción a los fundamentos y métodos de la biogeografía cladista. In: Llorente-Bousquets, J. & Morrone, J.J. (Eds.), Introducción a la biogeografía en Latinoamérica: Teorías, conceptos, métodos y aplicaciones. Las Prensas de Ciencias, Mexico City, pp. 225–232.
  13. Halffter, G. (1987) Biogeography of the montane entomofauna of Mexico and Central America. Annual Review of Entomology, 32 (1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.32.010187.000523
  14. Hasenack, H., da Silva, J.S., Weber, E.J. & Hofmann, G.S. (2017) A digital version of Hueck’s vegetation map of South America: 50 years after the release of his book on the sub-continent forests. Luján, 9 (9), 11–15.
  15. Kirchhoff, P. (1943) Mesoamérica. Acta Americana, 1 (1), 92–107.
  16. Löwenberg-Neto, P. (2014) Neotropical region: A shapefile of Morrone’s (2014) biogeographical regionalization. Zootaxa, 3802 (2), 300. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3802.2.12
  17. Marcus, J. & Spores, R. (1978) The Handbook of Middle American Indians: A retrospective look. American Anthropologist, 80 (1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1978.80.1.02a00060
  18. Morrone, J.J. (2014) Biogeographical regionalisation of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa, 3782 (1), 1–110. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3782.1.1
  19. Morrone, J.J. (2017) Neotropical biogeography: Regionalization and evolution. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 282 pp.
  20. Morrone, J.J., Escalante, T. & Rodríguez-Tapia, G. (2017) Mexican biogeographic provinces: Map and shapefiles. Zootaxa, 4277 (2), 277–279. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4277.2.8
  21. R Core Team (2024) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 21 Sept. 2026)
  22. Ríos-Muñoz, C.A. (2013) ¿Es posible reconocer una unidad biótica entre América del Norte y del Sur? Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 84 (3), 1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.34170
  23. Sanders, E.M. (1921) The Natural Regions of Mexico. Geographical Review, 11 (2), 212–226.
  24. Vivó, J.A. (1943) Los límites biogeográficos en America y la zona cultural mesoamericana. Revista Geográfica, 3, 109–131.
  25. West, R.C. (1964a) Handbook of Middle American Indians. Vol. 1. Natural Environment and Early Cultures. University of Texas Press, Austin, 570 pp.
  26. West, R.C. (1964b) The natural regions of Middle America. In: West, R.C. (Ed.), Handbook of Middle American Indians. Vol. 1. Natural Environment and Early Cultures. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 363–383. https://doi.org/10.7560/732599-010
  27. Woodbury, R.B. (1965) Handbook of Middle American Indians. Science, 148 (3671), 798–800.

How to Cite

Ríos-Muñoz, C.A., Amaya-González, N.B., Ochoa-Ochoa, L.M. & Flores-Villela, O.A. (2026) Natural biogeographic regions of Mexico and Central America: Digital files of historical and modified regionalizations. Zootaxa, 5881 (3), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5881.3.8