Talk:ISRO

Coordinates of ISRO's spaceports

Can someone please provide the correct coordinates of the spaceports of ISRO (Sriharikota, Kulasekarapattinam and Thumba)! It would be really helpful. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^🗿 17:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^🗿 03:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Bharatiya Antariksha Station.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:ISRO/GA4. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Akshadev (talk · contribs) 17:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: OzmoOzmo (talk · contribs) 07:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The first thing I noticed was the poor quality of prose in the sections on international cooperations, statistics and heads of ISRO.

In the section "International cooperations", it states too many countries (literally all the way from Afghanistan to Vietnam), and it appears to use definition lists instead of standard subheadings. It also has strange underlining in the section on NISAR (statements should not normally be underlined in Wikipedia).

In the section "Statistics", it only said when it was last updated, and other statistics in bullet points, and then includes a large table. I am not sure what to do with this.

The section "Heads of ISRO" is completely unsourced and all it is is an ordered list and a statement saying it is a list of chairpersons, with incorrect grammar and capitalisation (List of Chairpersons (since 1963) of ISRO. should be This is a list of chairpersons of ISRO, starting at 1963.). ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 07:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

This article covers every aspect of ISRO in detail, and seems to not be written from a summary style. Each section is quite long and could be split into its own article, and there are over 10 sections. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 00:13, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Could you please tell me which sections those are? Please let me know whether they need to be removed from this article or they need to be upgraded. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 04:12, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

In specific, the organisation structures and facilities section should be perhaps split into a list and then the section shortened per WP:SS as it is very long, covers less important aspects of the topic and not crucial to understanding the topic (at least in my knowledge). Comparing this to a similar article NASA, only the history section is this long. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 04:37, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

I have shortened the section as suggested, and shifted the information to another article. Let me know if there is any other changes to be made in organisation structures and facilities section. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 05:22, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

I have endeavored to implement all your suggestions to the best of my ability. If there are still any shortcomings, please let me know. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 04:06, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Additionally, let me know what to do with the 'statistics' section. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 04:15, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

I am not actually sure what to do with the statistics section. It isn't present in a similar article, NASA, though. Perhaps a second opinion would help, because I haven't reviewed articles of this length before. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 04:40, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

So what's the second opinion? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 04:45, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Should I remove the section entirely or is there something else I can do? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 04:47, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh! The second opinion is something new I am about to encounter. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 04:49, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

As I said, I don't know what to do with the statistics section. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 11:27, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

The information in the statistics section regarding the number of launches and re-entry missions conducted by ISRO is fine; however, the table detailing ISRO's budget does not seem relevant to me. Should I delete it entirely? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 11:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Now that you told me, I think the budget section should be deleted (the section on budgets seems to fail WP:STATSWP:NOTSTATS). And also, please convert it to prose instead of just an embedded list, in order to improve the quality of the prose. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 11:47, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

 Done, Is it good to go now or is there something else to add or remove? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 11:57, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Alright, I'll start reviewing the sources tomorrow, since it is 10 pm in my time zone. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 12:00, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

I am assuming you're from eastern Australia. Well okay, we will continue tomorrow. Goodnight! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 12:05, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Is the prose fine now, or is something still missing? Please let me know. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 05:50, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Alright, I took a little break in order to clear my mind. I will recommence the review now. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 11:26, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Source assessment table (I will update as I go):

Source assessment table

Statement w/ source	Reliable	Secondary	Independent	WP:OR	Acceptable	Status
For brevity, the acceptable and paywalled citations have been removed, but are still available via the page history.
The Indian Remote Sensing Programme (IRSP) are India's earth observation satellites. They are the largest collection of remote sensing satellites for civilian use in operation today, providing remote sensing services. All the satellites are placed in polar Sun-synchronous orbit (except GISATs) and provide data in a variety of spatial, spectral and temporal resolutions to enable several programs to be undertaken relevant to national development. The initial versions are composed of the 1 (A, B, C, D) nomenclature while the later versions were divided into sub-classes named based on their functioning and uses including Oceansat, Cartosat, HySIS, EMISAT and ResourceSat etc. Their names were unified under the prefix "EOS" regardless of functioning in 2020. They support a wide range of applications including optical, radar and electronic reconnaissance for Indian agencies, city planning, oceanography and environmental studies.	First: Y Reliable. Second: ? Don't know, but probably more reliable than ISRO itself. Third: Y Reliable.	First: N Primary. Second: Y Secondary. Third: N Primary.	First: N Non-independent. Second: Y Independent. Third: N Non-independent.	First: N Does not support the statement. Second: N Does not support the statement. Third: Y Supports the statement.	N Almost non-acceptable.	NY Present.
The Indian National Satellite System (INSAT) is the country's telecommunication system. It is a series of multipurpose geostationary satellites built and launched by ISRO to satisfy the telecommunications, broadcasting, meteorology and search-and-rescue needs. Since the introduction of the first one in 1983, INSAT has become the largest domestic communication system in the Asia-Pacific Region. It is a joint venture of DOS, the Department of Telecommunications, India Meteorological Department, All India Radio and Doordarshan. The overall coordination and management of INSAT system rests with the Secretary-level INSAT Coordination Committee. The nomenclature of the series was changed to "GSAT" from "INSAT", then further changed to "CMS" from 2020 onwards. These satellites have been used by the Indian Armed Forces as well. GSAT-9 or "SAARC Satellite" provides communication services for India's smaller neighbors.	First: ? Official Second: ? Don't know, but most likely more reliable than ISRO. Third: ? No consensus. Fourth: ? Official Fifth: ? Official	First, fourth and fifth: N Primary. Second and third: Y Secondary.	First, fourth and fifth: N Non-independent. Second and third: Y Independent.	C Unassessed	C Unassessed	C Present
The Ministry of Civil Aviation has decided to implement an indigenous Satellite-Based Regional GPS Augmentation System also known as Space-Based Augmentation System as part of the Satellite-Based Communications, Navigation, Surveillance and Air Traffic Management plan for civil aviation. The Indian SBAS system has been given the acronym GAGAN – GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation. A national plan for satellite navigation including implementation of a Technology Demonstration System (TDS) over Indian airspace as a proof of concept has been prepared jointly by Airports Authority of India and ISRO. The TDS was completed during 2007 with the installation of eight Indian Reference Stations at different airports linked to the Master Control Centre located near Bengaluru.	? Don't know if this is a practically self-published blog or an edited blog.	Y Secondary.	Y Independent.	N Does not mention proof of concept, or Bengaluru.	N Not acceptable for specific statement cited	N Present

ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 23:54, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Despite an extensive search, I was unable to locate a secondary reliable source regarding ISRO employees. I encountered the same difficulty in the budget section; consequently, I removed the reference, as no citation for the budget is available at NASA either. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 01:15, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

On hold because I have to finish reviewing Augmented triangular prism, of which I did not see the nominator's reply until 3 days after. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 02:06, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Not on hold. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 02:38, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

I should write a user script that semi-automates the source spot checking. Well, I'll go do that. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 08:13, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

This review may take longer than normal due to the length of this article and the fact that I have other things to do on Wikipedia. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 02:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Too tired for reviewing right now, will continue tomorrow. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 10:43, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Prose is fixed, see User talk:OzmoOzmo. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 09:29, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

@Akshadev, I am taking a break from source spot checking, and now am reviewing for image relevance and captions. Here are the ones that need to be fixed so far:

Fixed. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 03:57, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

6b assessment

Image	Location	Relevance	Caption	Status
File:STS008-44-611.jpg	The INSAT series	Y Relevant	N Bad grammar, and unsourced caption. I have partly fixed the grammar.	Y Fixed

ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 02:17, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

And, that's pretty much the only image that needs to be fixed. All the others are good now. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 02:19, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Continuing source spot check. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 02:33, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing several things in the article all by yourself. My concern is that is the status still N Present or is it Y Fixed (in 6b assessment table)? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 03:48, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

It needs a citation. I have also WP:BOLDly fixed the grammar, so only a citation is needed (since a claim of X being highly dependent on Y almost always requires a citation per WP:MINREF as being likely to be challenged). ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 03:50, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

I couldn't find a reliable source, so I trimmed the caption. Is it better now? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 03:56, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 03:57, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Biblio

• Burleson, D. (2005). "India". Space Programmes Outside the United States: All Exploration and Research Efforts, Country by Country. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. pp. 136–146. ISBN 0-7864-1852-4.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Unsurprising (talk) 13:53, 13 October 2026 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Image of Vikram lander on lunar surface taken by Pragyan rover navcam at 1104 IST, 30 August 2023 from 15 meters away

• ... that on 23 August 2023, Indian space agency ISRO became the first national agency in the world to successfully land a spacecraft near the lunar south pole?

• Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66594520

• • Reviewed:
  • Comment: I hope it gets included.

Improved to Good Article status by Akshadev (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC).

• New enough promotion, long enough, it's a GA and quality looks fine, I don't think this needs an image especially because it doesn't work here. Neutral and no signs of copyvio. Maybe adding mention that ISRO is the Indian space agency in the hook for interest/clarity? Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
  • @Jishara:  Done – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 02:49, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• whoops, forgot to ping @Akshadev: Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 03:54, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Approved. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 14:03, 9 October 2026 (UTC)

• Good to go and approved by reviewer. DYK nominator is also the GA nominator (so this is not a drive-by). Hook is clear, with advice from the reviewer. Although the hook is original and doesn't fail WP:COPYVIO, Earwig flags the article as 68.6% similarity to a certain news article, see this for reference. Perhaps this is a mistake, so I will promote this once this is resolved! Again, great work, and I want to see this in the preps and Main Page ASAP (with an updated PSHAW as well)! Though I still need caution as a promoter, plus this may buy time for a PSHAW update... Unsurprising (Andy)  📝 🗣️💬 👥 12:55, 12 October 2026 (UTC)

What's the GA situation here?

@Asilvering and Akshadev: I was looking to review the oldest unreviewed WP:GAN, which from that page now looks like this one. The top of this talk page, says "Nominated by – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 at 17:03, 1 September 2025". However I'm looking at this talk page, and it's very confusing. The top of the page, Article milestones, (Template:Article history), says it failed 3 GA nomininations. However there are at least 4 GA nominations for this article, Talk:ISRO/GA1, Talk:ISRO/GA2, Talk:ISRO/GA3, Talk:ISRO/GA4. And that's not counting Talk:ISRO/GA5, which Asilvering vacated/deleted in this edit? Can someone, possibly one of the two of you, explain what happened to GA4 and why it isn't listed on this talk page? Where is the discussion that led to vacating/deleting GA5? How could this article be considered nominated in 1 Sep 2025, if GA4 was failed in April 2026? Was the intent to actually vacate/delete GA4, not GA5? If someone (possibly me) were to want to review this article for GA, would that be GA5 again or GA6 or GA4? Should this article be considered the oldest GAN? --GRuban (talk) 18:20, 22 October 2026 (UTC)

I vacated GA5 for being AI-generated. You'd be GA5 again if you review. It looks like GA4 wasn't properly closed, and that's why it doesn't appear in the talk page header - the reviewer manually incremented the counter to 5 and didn't fill out the rest. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 03:39, 23 October 2026 (UTC)