User talk:Aldol732
Add topic| This is Aldol732's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
AfC notification: Draft:TCFH has a new comment
[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: TCFH has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: 2-Chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazine has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 23 February 2026 (UTC)- Thanks for your help Graeme! I had a question. So 2-Chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazine is more commonly referred to as CDMT. But there is already a wikipedia page for CDMT. Is there a way to change the name of this new 2-Chloro-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazine page to CDMT or is that name just taken? It would make searching simpler since no one is going to remember this long IUPAC name. I appreciate your advice and support. Aldol732 (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- No, the name is not "just taken"; it can be changed. But you may want to read WP:Disambiguation first. The right course of action depends on the extent to which the Council for Dance, Drama and Musical Theatre is the primary topic associated with "CDMT". I suspect (without evidence) that it is.
- If many more "CDMT" searchers mean the council than the triazine, then at most you should put a second WP:HATNOTE link on CDMT for the few misdirected users. In the unlikely case where the searchers mean each with comparable frequencies, then you can WP:MOVE the current contents of CDMT to an appropriate title (probably Council for Dance, Drama and Musical Theatre) and replace the current contents of CDMT with a disambiguation page (here's our style guide). Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 02:09, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
Reaction pictures
[edit]Aldol732, I noticed that you tend to "bundle" multiple chemical reaction diagrams into a single image. Please don't do that.
Almost always, each reaction has associated descriptive text in the article. Often, a future revision of the page will split up that text to different places on the page. (This eventuality becomes much more likely when I edit it. 😂) When the split happens, ideally the image would also be "unbundled" to separate off the corresponding reactions. But IMHO rarely do WP editors enjoys making that image edit; most find it annoying, and some are too intimidated to touch images (not to mention, if the images are in JPG format, then each edit loses information). Consequently it would be better if the image comes "pre-split".
TBC: your visual design choices aren't unreasonable; I'm concerned solely about future maintenance. To get the same visual effect as you do now, just put the pictures one after the other. That is, instead of
[[File:Reactions1and2.png|frameless|upright=2]]
you can write
[[File:Reaction1.png|frameless|upright=1]][[File:Reaction2.png|frameless|upright=1]]
and it should look pretty much the same. Thanks, Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 02:51, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
- No problem. I appreciate the guidance. I will proceed as suggested in the future. Are you requesting I do this for my previous edits? Thanks. Aldol732 (talk) 11:07, 23 October 2026 (UTC)
