User talk:Keivan.f
Add topic| This is Keivan.f's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
| Welcome to Keivan.f's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. I will try to WP:PING you as well. Conversely if you are replying to something I've said on another talk page, reply there and include {{ping|Keivan.f}} to alert me. |
| Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
Well...
[edit]The sheer number of articles on this book continue to increase. @No Swan So Fine and Keivan, any thoughts on this piece ? MSincccc (talk) 10:49, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- You could mention that William did not respond to the book's content, but nor has Harry. So far it has been only Buckingham Palace which represents Charles but then again he's the only one who's in the line of fire so that makes sense. I have already covered the claims made within excerpts released from the book thus far. Keivan.fTalk 23:02, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Sources removal
[edit]I'm not sure what happened with the sources on the Swan Song article. I was editing on phone browser, which I'm not used to, so i must have accidentally removed them, though I'm not sure how. There was no reason for me to remove them. I was only copyediting. ItsShandog (talk) 07:22, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- @ItsShandog Don't worry about it. It happens. I thought maybe you wanted to replace them with another source, so I was trying to suggest that the existing sources should have remained until you added the new ones, since it's not a good idea to leave sentences unreferenced. But now I see it was just a technical error, which can happen to all of us. Great job making the info more concise. Cheers! Keivan.fTalk 13:48, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for understanding. I really don't like editing on my phone, it's awkward to use. Thank you for adding all those references. If anything like that happens again, feel free to revert the edit and I'll redo it. I don't want to create extra work for you. ItsShandog (talk) 14:14, 19 September 2026 (UTC)
Re. a future piece for the Signpost
[edit]I realise that you've quite a busy schedule both on and off-Wiki. But I would appreciate it if you could share some Wiki-specific answers which I intend to include inside this piece.
I'm presently working on the questions so that I don't take up much of your time. The article will cover the advice multiple users, who have been on the platform for years, have to share with newcomers and those who are not that experienced.
Thanks for your time. Best, MSincccc (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
- Sure, it seems to be an interesting piece. Send me the questions when they are ready. Regards. Keivan.fTalk 04:48, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
New cross-language page link: Esra Özatay
[edit]A new page Esra Özatay on the Azerbaijani Wikipedia has been linked to your page Esra Özatay via Wikidata (Q28045448).
You will not be notified in the future about new articles linked to any of the articles you have created, if you wish to opt-in to receiving these notifications, please follow the opt-in instructions.
Addition of “Media image” content on attractiveness rankings
[edit]Hi @Keivan.f
I propose adding a short, well-sourced paragraph to the “Media image” section highlighting Alia Bhatt’s presence in media-based attractiveness and desirability rankings. Similar content is commonly included in the articles of other major Bollywood actors, such as Deepika Padukone, Katrina Kaif, Kareena Kapoor and Priyanka Chopra, where it helps provide a balanced view of their media perception and public image. In Bhatt’s case, there are multiple reliable sources documenting her inclusion in lists such as
A high-profile and popular celebrity in India, Bhatt is described as a sex symbol and ranks high on various listings of the most attractive Indian celebrities.[1][2] In 2014 and 2016, she was listed in "100 Sexiest Woman" by the Indian edition of FHM.[3][4] In 2015, she appeared on HuffPost's "100 Most Influential Women on Twitter" list.[5] The Indian edition of People described her as "India's Most Beautiful Woman" in 2016.[6] Bhatt was listed in first place in The Times of India's "50 Most Desirable Women" list of 2018, and she was named the "Sexiest Asian Woman" by the UK magazine Eastern Eye in 2019.[7][8] In 2020, Eastern Eye also featured her in their dynamic dozen for the decade list.[9] In 2019 and 2023, Bhatt featured in Rediff's annual "Top Bollywood Actresses" listing.[10][11] She has been featured frequently on other Rediff lists, including "Bollywood's Most Beautiful Actresses", "Bollywood's Best Actresses Ever" and "Top 10 Bollywood Actresses of all Time".[12][13][14][15]
Add this above [[ Forbes Asia has featured Bhatt in their 30 Under 30 list of 2017 and in their 100 Digital Stars list of 2020]]
These mentions are sourced from established publications and are already widely cited across comparable biographies. The addition would therefore improve consistency with similar articles and enhance coverage of her public image without giving undue weight. All sources are reliable and already formatted per citation guidelines. Feedback from other editors is welcome.
Thank You ~2026-52433-91 (talk) 06:50, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hello. I propose taking this to the article talk page to get input from the page's regular contributors. Once you have consensus there, the suggested content can be added. Regards. Keivan.fTalk 08:36, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Keivan.f
- Thank you for the suggestion. The matter has actually been on the article’s talk page for quite some time, but unfortunately, no one has considered or responded to it. If possible, could you please review the proposed content and, if you find it appropriate, add it to the article? I would greatly appreciate your help in moving this forward. Regards. ~2026-52433-91 (talk) 08:59, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
- I will definitely consider it. Let me have a look later; if I decide against adding it, we will potentially need to open a WP:RfC to get more input. Best. Keivan.fTalk 14:55, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
- Added with a bit of modification. Keivan.fTalk 22:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Keivan.f
- Thank you for your previous edits to the section. I’ve also made a few corrections and updates to the current version, keeping in mind that the article is a Featured Article and therefore the grammar and wording should be as polished as possible:
- Combined the four Rediff.com sources into a single joint reference to keep the citations concise.
- Added verified listings featuring Bhatt from The Guardian and IMDb.
- Corrected “She has been [featured frequently
] on other Rediff.com lists” to “She has been frequently featured on other Rediff.com lists” for clearer and more natural phrasing..
- I’d appreciate it if you could also review and correct the current version where necessary.
- She has been frequently featured on other Rediff.com lists, including "Bollywood's Most Beautiful Actresses", "Bollywood's Best Actresses Ever" and "Top 10 Bollywood Actresses of all Time".[16] In 2022, Mark Kermode of The Guardian named Bhatt among the year's ten best performers.[17] In 2024, she was placed 4th on IMDb's List of 100 Most Viewed Indian Stars.[18] ~2026-53330-26 (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
- Done. Though I tried to keep relevant info under their appropriate corresponding paragraph. A paragraph discussing her appearance cannot simultaneously discuss her acting talent, so I added the Guardian comment and her ranking on the IMDb list to other relevant paragraphs. Keivan.fTalk 12:33, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- She has been frequently featured on other Rediff.com lists, including "Bollywood's Most Beautiful Actresses", "Bollywood's Best Actresses Ever" and "Top 10 Bollywood Actresses of all Time".[16] In 2022, Mark Kermode of The Guardian named Bhatt among the year's ten best performers.[17] In 2024, she was placed 4th on IMDb's List of 100 Most Viewed Indian Stars.[18] ~2026-53330-26 (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2026 (UTC)
References
- ↑ "Alia Bhatt Knows How To Make Edgy Fashion Hot". Elle India. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
- ↑ "Alia Bhatt photo gallery". News18. Retrieved 17 April 2026.
- ↑ "FHM India Sexiest Women List 2014". 2 July 2014. Archived from the original on 2 April 2017. Retrieved 2 April 2017.
- ↑ "100 Sexiest Women 2016". FHM India. Retrieved 18 April 2026.
- ↑ Ridley, Louise (10 June 2015). "The 100 Most Influential Women On Twitter". HuffPost. Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
- ↑ "Alia Bhatt is "India's Most Beautiful Woman"". People. 10 October 2016. Retrieved 15 May 2026.
- ↑ Mukherjee, Madhureeta (24 May 2019). "Alia Bhatt is the Times most desirable woman of 2018". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 26 May 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2019.
- ↑ "Alia Bhatt voted sexiest Asian female of the year, Deepika Padukone sexiest of decade in UK poll". The Indian Express. 11 December 2019. Archived from the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 19 January 2023.
- ↑ Nazir, Asjad (9 January 2020). "Dynamic dozen for the decade". Eastern Eye. Retrieved 17 September 2024.
- ↑ Tuteja, Joginder (3 July 2019). "Bollywood's TOP Actresses of 2019, so far". Rediff.com. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
- ↑ Jha, Subhash K. (14 December 2023). "The Top Performers Of 2023". Rediff.com. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
- ↑ Tuteja, Joginder (7 July 2016). "The Top 10 Actresses of 2016 so far". Rediff.com. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
- ↑ "Top Actresses, 2017". Rediff.com. 3 January 2018. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
- ↑ Verma, Sukanya (31 December 2018). "And 2018's Best Bollywood Actresses are..." Rediff.com. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
- ↑ Sen, Raja (31 December 2014). "The Best Actresses in Hindi cinema, 2014". Rediff.com. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
- ↑ Tuteja, Joginder (7 July 2016). "The Top 10 Actresses of 2016 so far". Rediff.com. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
"Top Actresses, 2017". Rediff.com. 3 January 2018. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
Verma, Sukanya (31 December 2018). "And 2018's Best Bollywood Actresses are..." Rediff.com. Retrieved 19 April 2026.
Sen, Raja (31 December 2014). "The Best Actresses in Hindi cinema, 2014". Rediff.com. Retrieved 19 April 2026. - ↑ "Film: Mark Kermode's 10 best of 2022". The Guardian. 18 December 2022. Archived from the original on 20 December 2022. Retrieved 21 December 2022.
- ↑ "Deepika Padukone, Shah Rukh Khan Top IMDb's List of Most Viewed Indian Stars". Variety. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 29 August 2024.
Re. Seward's book
[edit]Any thoughts on an article for Catherine & Diana by Ingrid Seward? Also, is it reliable enough to be cited in a GA or FA-class article? I look forward to your response. Best, MSincccc (talk) 07:08, 20 October 2026 (UTC)
