Jump to content

User talk:Risker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 19
ImageBeware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.



On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog


Stats for pending changes trial
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases
Category:Wikipedia semi-protected pages
User:Writ_Keeper/Scripts/orangeBar.js in case I need it
User:Risker/Mauricie
{{OversightBlock|sig = ~~~~}} signs the template.

Notes

[edit]


WP:ARBAP2
{{subst:W-screen}} {{subst:Suppressed}} Wikipedia:SPI/CLERK and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Indicators


Note to self: Consider writing an article about the Forster Family Dollhouse in the Canadian Museum of Civilization. Some day.

Listeria Bot Wikipedia:New_page_patrol_source_guide#Africa

Please post below

[edit]


Request for Independent Review

[edit]

Hi @Risker, I'm reaching out to request if you can independently review an ongoing global ban on my community members. I'm only reaching out neutrally on their behalf because I know that they are all different individual and not Sock puppets.

Here is where the discussion taking place and these three users - Chinemeremprince, Ozims Divine and Anumodu favour Amarachi are all different.

To the best of my knowledged Anumodu favour Amarachi has appealed for unblock but was declined. Also Ozims Divine has written the stewards (I don't know the outcome yet).

What I'm requesting for is that you support in reviewing or directing them on how to go about appealing for unblock as they have no access to request via Wiki for now. Lucy Iwuala (talk) 17:40, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Lucy, nice to see your name here, but unfortunate about the situation. I will take a look, but this will not be quick as the blocks are over a year old and it will take a while to sort things out. From the very first look, it appears that the users may have been working together at a single location for some sort of edit-a-thon related to a 1Lib1Ref campaign? A little background on how the accounts wound up in the same place at about the same time would be very helpful, if you have access to that information. Please let me be clear, I am not a steward and thus cannot lift a global ban or block by myself. At most, I can advocate limiting the block (e.g., reducing it from a global lock to a global block) so that it is possible for the users to provide explanations for the issues that brought their editing to the attention of CheckUsers and stewards. On a very surface level, it appears that they were adding poorly referenced or genuinely problematic content on more than one project, and that's pretty serious. Risker (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for responding @Risker
For context, these users were participating in this in-person and images of the event are here which is why I think their IP were flagged and thought to be one person.
Yes, I quite understand your not being a steward and that it will likely take time to resolve. However, I needed to invite an admin that will understand the circumstances of sharing same IP due to location for users coming from regions like Africa.
As for their contribution, they have been explained better on the importance of contributing meaningfully.
And yes, reducing it to global block will give them access to explain their circumstance to the Admins.
Thank you Risker and nice to connect here with you - even though it's based on a difficult situation like this. Lucy Iwuala (talk) 00:23, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Risker, I understand you mentioned it will take some time.
I'm just reaching out to also let you know that we still look forward to the response you might have for us.
Thank you. Lucy Iwuala (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi Lucy. I have done some preliminary review on this, and will be at Wikimania in the near future. Sometimes it works best when one can talk with the people who are most knowledgeable about a situation over a refreshing beverage, face to face. I haven't forgotten this. Risker (talk) 07:00, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello @Risker and thanks for getting back to me.
Sure, I look forward to the outcome of the discussion and wishing a safe flight to Wikimania - hopefully I get to meet you there as well as i will be attending. Lucy Iwuala (talk) 16:12, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply


July 2026 Wikimedia Café meetups regarding Wikimedia governance and options for reform

[edit]
The logo for the Wikimedia Café

Hello! There will be two Wikimedia Café discussion opportunities in July. Both sessions will focus on Wikimedia governance, including possible follow-ups to the Movement Charter and options for reform. Participants may attend either or both Café sessions.

This month, to deconflict the Café meetups from Wikimania, the meetups will be held one day later than usual.

  1. 26 July 2026 15:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to the Americas, Africa, and Europe
  2. 27 July 2026 03:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to Asia and the Pacific

Please see the Café page for more information, including how to register!

cropped image of colored pencils

↠Pine (✉) 03:11, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Signpost help request

[edit]

Hi. I submitted a signpost article here: Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Submissions#Why_Wiki_wouldn't_get_off_the_ground_today_and_why_it's_nosediving. Blueraspberry looked at it and asked I have a wiki friend look it over but I don't have any wiki friends, so I decided to ask you since your article is just above mine on that signpost page. If you don't mind, could you look it over and copyedit it? The actual draft is here: User:BlueRockThrush/Why Wiki wouldn't get off the ground today and why it's nosediving Thank you. BlueRockThrush (talk) 22:34, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi BlueRockThrush. I am literally about to get on a plane, and I am not sure that I will be in a position to help over the next two weeks. If you can find someone else to help you, that would be your best bet. The article topic is very interesting; I gave it a quick skim, and I think it is just the kind of topic that would work well for the Signpost. If you're still struggling to find some assistance in two weeks, ping me again and I will do what I can. Sorry to not be more help. Risker (talk) 14:30, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Café message distribution

[edit]
The logo for the Wikimedia Café

Hello! To continue receiving announcements about the Wikimedia Café on your user talk page, please add your preferred user subscription page(s) to meta:Global message delivery/Targets/Wikimedia Café. This change only affects user talk page deliveries, and hopefully you'll appreciate the customization options. If you don't subscribe a user page then you won't receive further bulk announcements regarding the Café on your user talk page, although you can always subscribe later.

cropped image of colored pencils

Thanks! ↠Pine (✉) 23:56, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 14

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Elizabeth Palmer

[edit]

Hi, you protected this in 2010, thought it could be removed now? LibStar (talk) 05:05, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. Wow, sixteen years. I certainly hope we won't have the same issues after all this time. Thanks for drawing this to my attention. The protection has been lifted. Risker (talk) 05:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

BLP

[edit]

Hi Risker. I read your comment. If the subject of the article does not want it to exist I am happy to blabkbthe page for deletion. I think the subject is fascinating and very notable for a variety of reasons not least of which are being one of Wikipedia's parent organization's original employees and a leader in its tech over lany many years. More recebtly they've been involved in the union organizing efforts and controversial staffing changes.

Whether they meet Wikipedia notability standards is an issue. They are already mentioned on the site in articles and their name is redirected to an article where they are briefly noted and quoted.

Draftspace is where I develop entries on subjects, and I do not predetermine an outcome and am always open to suggestions and fixes from those who have more expertise on a subject or access to better sources than I do.

Take care. Please let me know if there is anything else I should know or you'd like to suggest. I am happy to take any input into consideration. All the best. 01:08, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 15

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:23, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol September 2026 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
Image
  • On 1 September 2026, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin at a particularly important time for NPP.
  • The backlog has now passed 30,000 unreviewed articles, a level that has been described in current NPP discussions as exceptionally high and potentially difficult to overcome through normal reviewing alone. Backlog drives are one of the few measures that have historically produced a noticeable reduction in the backlog, so the participation of as many active patrollers as possible will matter this month.
  • If you can review during September, please make articles your priority. Every article that is reviewed is a meaningful reduction in the backlog. With the queue at its current size, even a relatively small increase in the number of articles each patroller reviews can add up to a substantial difference over the course of the month.
  • This is a hybrid drive, so redirect reviewing is still included. Redirects can be a useful way for newer patrollers to get comfortable with NPP and can help people build up to reviewing articles. However, the main goal of this drive is to tackle the article backlog, and experienced patrollers are particularly encouraged to spend as much of their available reviewing time on articles as they can.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • If you have been thinking about doing more NPP, this is an especially good month to jump in. Whether you can review a few pages or hundreds, every review helps. And if you are already an active patroller, please consider whether you can put in some additional time during September to help bring the backlog back under control.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
Image The Original Barnstar
Thank you for answering the question that I recently posted on my talk page. Ajk1962f (talk) 06:56, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 16

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:59, 1 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 17

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:53, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Waterford School

[edit]

Hello, I think the page might be safe for now, there hasn't been enough vandalism for indef protection. The vandals might not return for a long time and the only known times I know this was vandalised was on 20th and 21 May. Could the protection be removed or could pending changes work instead? Love my dreams (talk) 03:32, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello there. While it may be worthwhile to look at shortening the length of the indefinite protection at some time in the future, the protection was added because certain edits needed to be suppressed after several related inappropriate edits that were just below the suppression threshold. Pending changes would not be apppropriate given those circumstances. I normally review my "indefinite" protections about once every six to eight months and consider whether the circumstances have changed sufficiently. School articles in particular are prone to BLP violations and "outing" or publishing of personal information about under-age students, which is why many of them wind up being under some level of protection for extended periods. I hope this helps. Risker (talk) 03:47, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 18

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:50, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 19

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:30, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply