Jump to content

User talk:Ykraps

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Ykraps in topic Roebucks at Charleston



The website of the late Paul Benyon (1940-2019)

[edit]

Hi there,

When Paul passed away, his website was preserved, by being ported across to rootsweb.
https://sites.rootsweb.com/~pbtyc/18-1900/C/C.html

This is a tad problematic for wikipedia edits, insofar as rootsweb has forum content, and other user-generated content that would fail the WP:RS test.

My personal take is that what he gathered is like wikipedia itself. I would be loath to commence to argue my case with "Wikipedia says...." or "the internet says..." What I can do, with pbtyc or en.wikipedia.org is to use it as a springboard to reliable sources.

Hope this is of use. Keith H99 (talk) 13:30, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Keith H99: Very useful indeed, thank you. I never took Benyon as a reliable source, being self-pubished but always found it really useful as a good starting point, as you say. Best regards --Ykraps (talk) 05:14, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]
Image

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Re-publication of British Warships in the Age of Sail volumes 1 (1603-1714), 2 (1714-1792) and 3 (1793-1817)

[edit]

You have left a message on my user talk page saying that you've sent me an email. Sadly this has not been received at my email address. Can you kindly re-send it, making sure you have my email address correctly as: tanparcau@btopenworld.com ? I'll be most grateful as I'd like to try and include as many small corrections as possible, and your help could be invaluable. But I'll need suggested changes during March, if I'm to include them in the new editions. Incidentally, the new editions are already pictured on the Amazon website. Regards, Rif. Rif Winfield (talk) 15:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Rif, I have sent another email. Please let me know if it fails to reach you. Best regards --Ykraps (talk) 08:03, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]

Nomination of Glossary of Dorset dialect words for deletion

[edit]
Image

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glossary of Dorset dialect words, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Dorset dialect words until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for HMS Solebay (1785)

[edit]
Image

On 24 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HMS Solebay (1785), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that HMS Solebay and HMS Derwent were the first ships assigned to suppress the Atlantic slave trade? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Solebay (1785). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, HMS Solebay (1785)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
Image
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Roebucks at Charleston

[edit]

Hi, hope you're well! I'm moving on to Romulus soon in my campaign to GT the Roebucks. Initial reading suggests she had similar service to Roebuck, especially regarding operations at Charleston. Do you have any recommended reading to suggest for this? Thanks! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:39, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe: Forgive the tardiness of my reply, I have not been around lately. Sorry to report that I can't really add anything of value to what is already there. I see you have plundered the usual suspects; Clowes, Winfield, Hepper etc. I checked out Mahan and Lossing but they give only the briefest of mentions. You might want to log in and read Gardiner's (ed) Navies and the American Revolution. The article looks in good shape though so well done and good luck. If it stalls at GA, feel free to ping me. Ykraps (talk) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply