Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BMW 320 TC
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to BMW 3 Series (E90)#Motorsports. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:39, 10 October 2026 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BMW 320 TC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I propose merging to BMW 3 Series (E90)#Motorsports because like articles about drivers, Wikipedia have become far too overpopulated with articles about drivers, teams and races as well as cars that do not assert notability to warrant its own article and this is one of them.
Looking at the sources, 2 of the 3 are WP:PRIMARY, the other is a blog post. Searched per WP:BEFORE turns out barely anything of significance thus enforcing my reason to propose a merge. BuffaloTaro (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Transportation. BuffaloTaro (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
- Not sure - it is a lot of largely unrelated content to add to BMW 3 Series (E90), perhaps the best thing to do is to have a page dedicated to the various racing versions of the E90. Fully agree that this article needs better sourcing, but I think it will be easy to make this meet WP:N. Did you notify other involved editors? Mr.choppers | ✎ 20:22, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
perhaps the best thing to do is to have a page dedicated to the various racing versions of the E90
This can be done, yeah! FaviFake (talk) 23:42, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nominator's rationale. FaviFake (talk) 23:42, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. I also did not find any sigcov of this car. The best that is available is that some drivers have used it, which is not enough to contribute to the notability of this page. Kelob2678 (talk) 12:31, 10 October 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
