Skip to content

Use readable plugin mentions without suppressing same-name skills - #51865

Merged
copyberry[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
copyberry/codex-internal-to-codex-oss/aa8c98f293d12e62d32d43206e076cbe1fcb2a3b
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

copyberry[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
copyberry/codex-internal-to-codex-oss/aa8c98f293d12e62d32d43206e076cbe1fcb2a3b

Conversation

@copyberry

@copyberry copyberry Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Use readable plugin mentions without suppressing same-name skills

Why

Generated app IDs produce opaque plugin mention labels. A selected @foo plugin mention also prevented a separate $foo skill mention from being submitted.

What changed

  • Use eligible display names, such as @Postman, for plugins named app- followed by 32 lowercase hexadecimal characters, while preserving the plugin binding. Accept 1–64 ASCII letters, digits, underscores, or hyphens, excluding common environment variable names; otherwise retain the existing naming fallback.
  • Only $ mention bindings suppress automatic skill selection, allowing @foo $foo to submit both the plugin and the skill.

Testing

Add naming tests for accepted display names and fallback cases, a composer snapshot verifying @Postman and its plugin binding, and a submission regression test for a plugin and skill sharing the name foo.

…1865)

## Why

Generated app IDs produce opaque plugin mention labels. A selected `@foo` plugin mention also prevented a separate `$foo` skill mention from being submitted.

## What changed

- Use eligible display names, such as `@Postman`, for plugins named `app-` followed by 32 lowercase hexadecimal characters, while preserving the plugin binding. Accept 1–64 ASCII letters, digits, underscores, or hyphens, excluding common environment variable names; otherwise retain the existing naming fallback.
- Only `$` mention bindings suppress automatic skill selection, allowing `@foo $foo` to submit both the plugin and the skill.

## Testing

Add naming tests for accepted display names and fallback cases, a composer snapshot verifying `@Postman` and its plugin binding, and a submission regression test for a plugin and skill sharing the name `foo`.

GitOrigin-RevId: aa8c98f293d12e62d32d43206e076cbe1fcb2a3b
@copyberry
copyberry Bot force-pushed the copyberry/codex-internal-to-codex-oss/aa8c98f293d12e62d32d43206e076cbe1fcb2a3b branch from f98a394 to 746103b Compare October 7, 2026 22:46
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review 🔄 Running since 2026-10-07T22:46:52.193223Z f98a394 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@copyberry
copyberry Bot merged commit 746103b into main Oct 7, 2026
1 check passed
@copyberry
copyberry Bot deleted the copyberry/codex-internal-to-codex-oss/aa8c98f293d12e62d32d43206e076cbe1fcb2a3b branch October 7, 2026 22:46
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 7, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant