Skip to content

Add structured tracing for Guardian reviews and background scoring - #52274

Merged
copyberry[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
copyberry/codex-internal-to-codex-oss/3e20d16836576f834998af473815bfb55e671de5
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

copyberry[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
copyberry/codex-internal-to-codex-oss/3e20d16836576f834998af473815bfb55e671de5

Conversation

@copyberry

@copyberry copyberry Bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Add structured tracing for Guardian reviews and background scoring

What changed

  • Add debug spans with review, thread, turn, and tool-call identifiers to correlate approval reviews and background scoring.
  • Log review retry scheduling with failure details, attempt limits, backoff, and remaining deadline budget.
  • Emit warnings for Guardian V2 background scoring failures with the failure reason, context mode, and duration, even when metrics are unavailable.

…52274)

## What changed

- Add debug spans with review, thread, turn, and tool-call identifiers to correlate approval reviews and background scoring.
- Log review retry scheduling with failure details, attempt limits, backoff, and remaining deadline budget.
- Emit warnings for Guardian V2 background scoring failures with the failure reason, context mode, and duration, even when metrics are unavailable.

GitOrigin-RevId: 3e20d16836576f834998af473815bfb55e671de5
@copyberry
copyberry Bot force-pushed the copyberry/codex-internal-to-codex-oss/3e20d16836576f834998af473815bfb55e671de5 branch from 56d6f02 to 6ac8b1b Compare October 8, 2026 21:02
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review 🔄 Running since 2026-10-08T21:02:21.475756Z 56d6f02 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@copyberry
copyberry Bot merged commit 6ac8b1b into main Oct 8, 2026
1 check failed
@copyberry
copyberry Bot deleted the copyberry/codex-internal-to-codex-oss/3e20d16836576f834998af473815bfb55e671de5 branch October 8, 2026 21:02
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor


Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.


I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA


You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 8, 2026
@megaboi-sudo
megaboi-sudo deployed to issue-triage October 8, 2026 21:07 — with Image GitHub Actions Active
@megaboi-sudo
megaboi-sudo deployed to issue-triage October 8, 2026 21:07 — with Image GitHub Actions Active
@megaboi-sudo
megaboi-sudo deployed to issue-triage October 8, 2026 21:07 — with Image GitHub Actions Active
@rrock1234
rrock1234 deployed to issue-triage October 8, 2026 21:08 — with Image GitHub Actions Active
@rrock1234
rrock1234 deployed to issue-triage October 8, 2026 21:08 — with Image GitHub Actions Active
@rrock1234
rrock1234 deployed to issue-triage October 8, 2026 21:08 — with Image GitHub Actions Active

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
issue-triage — 6ac8b1b5 Deployed Oct 8, 2026 by rrock1234 via Translate non-English issue #18563
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants