Wikifunctions:Feature petitions
WF:FP redirects here. For compositions, which use the functional programming paradigm, see WF:How to create implementations#Compositions. For other FP languages, see WF:Rosetta.
This page is for users to petition requested features to the Abstract Wikipedia team and for the Abstract Wikipedia to gauge community consensus and priorities. To add your signature to a proposal, simply add # Any additional comments ~~~~ on a new line after a proposal. To add a new proposal, add ===Brief name, one sentence or so.=== to the bottom.
Proposals
New Types
Partial functions/currying
- Feeglgeef (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- CMassaro (WMF) said
There shouldn't be any issue from the backend's perspective. It sounds like a UI problem.
- CMassaro (WMF) said
Support PLEASE having to nest n-ary apply is killing me. YoshiRulz (talk) 14:29, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- As of August, this is experimentally supported by way of a new Type. See WF:Catalogue/Functional operations#Anonymous functions.
N-argument apply/reduce/map
For implementations and testers, show the associated function in Recent Changes (etc)
Feature summary: See a link to the associated function when there is a link to an implementation or a test, especially in Recent Changes and Special:ListObjectsByType)
- Support as proposer GrounderUK (talk) 09:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Return string values in a container that supports Copy and (optionally) makes non-display characters visible
- Support as proposer GrounderUK (talk) 09:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Provide details of result validation
Feature summary: The “Details” for a Test case should include (as a minimum) the Implementation used by the Function specified for the “result validation”.
- Support as proposer GrounderUK (talk) 09:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Improve access by functions to Persistent object labels (and other keys)
- Support as proposer GrounderUK (talk) 09:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think fetch labels of Persistent object (Z40897) and return Wikifunctions Object (Z40102) have this covered? YoshiRulz (talk) 12:39, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
- The original ticket remains open because calls like this fail. There is an additional deficiency for pre-defined objects: For pre-defined objects, Z828/fetch Persistent object fetches from disk and so omits any user-made changes, e.g. aliases or non-en content. I think we should probably include Provide a custom component for choosing, and a custom display for viewing, Z96 instances under this heading too, because fetch Persistent object (Z828) itself can’t be used as an embedded function and users should not be expected to know a persistent object’s identifier (Z2K1/id). GrounderUK (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
- Z40102 succeeds at fetching Z6, though it's affected by phab:T410501 all the same. YoshiRulz (talk) 04:11, 23 September 2026 (UTC)
- The original ticket remains open because calls like this fail. There is an additional deficiency for pre-defined objects: For pre-defined objects, Z828/fetch Persistent object fetches from disk and so omits any user-made changes, e.g. aliases or non-en content. I think we should probably include Provide a custom component for choosing, and a custom display for viewing, Z96 instances under this heading too, because fetch Persistent object (Z828) itself can’t be used as an embedded function and users should not be expected to know a persistent object’s identifier (Z2K1/id). GrounderUK (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
- I think fetch labels of Persistent object (Z40897) and return Wikifunctions Object (Z40102) have this covered? YoshiRulz (talk) 12:39, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
Structured data/documentation
- Weak Support since I suspect the workaround of {{Function documentation}}/{{Type documentation}}, in conjunction with Wikidata, will be sufficient. IIRC there are systems which parse the parameters in a Wikitext template call, should anyone want it machine-readable. YoshiRulz (talk) 07:55, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Visually distinguish Wikidata items from properties
This call shows the problem: it echoes a Z6091, a Z6001, a Z6094, and a Z6004. They appear identical because the same icon is used, and their English labels are the same. A more realistic example is a composition like Z31134, with some items and some properties mixed in with a wall of text.
- Support as proposer. YoshiRulz (talk) 14:12, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- I wrote some hacky CSS as a workaround. YoshiRulz (talk) 14:12, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Support --99of9 (talk) 04:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support …more generally, though, failing to distinguish function calls from other types of object is distinctly unhelpful. I mention it here because a Z6001 is distinguished from Z6091 by being a function call, which should remain obvious in any collapsed form. GrounderUK (talk) 18:07, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
Show more than 5 Implementations/Tests by default
- Support as proposer. 10/20/50 would make more sense than 5/10/50. YoshiRulz (talk) 01:22, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Support bump to 10 for now IMO --99of9 (talk) 04:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
