Showing posts with label survey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label survey. Show all posts

Sunday, March 4, 2007

The book that I couldn't live without


ImageThe most precious book I've read (to date)

Sharon Bakar of the informative plus influential Bibliobibuli blog it was who first alerted me to the fact that the 1st of March is World Book Day in Britain. Also, that for the event's tenth anniversary this year, a survey was conducted as what are the ten books that people feel that they can't live without.

A list of the top ten vote-getting books can be found over here. Looking at it, I'm a bit embarrassed to discover that while I've actually tried reading nine out of the ten books -- if you count, as was done by the poll organizers, the Harry Potter series as a single tome -- on the list, I was disinclined to complete my checking out of those that occupy the first two as well as ninth place on it!

Interested readers also can find a list of the top 100 hundred vote-getting books over here. Sadly though, while there's room for such as one Louisa M. Alcott novel and another by Enid Blyton on it, the published tome with which I'd answer Sharon's posed question of "So what's your book you couldn't live without?" is no where to be found on that lengthier roll of honor.

As one of the book in question's reviewers and proponents lamented, interest in the works of its author has waned in recent years. For all this, however, (s)he feels confident enough to state that R. F. Delderfield's To Serve Them All My Days is "one of the greatest novels of the 20th century" and predict that in time, "the epic book will have its day once again and a new generation will give Delderfield his proper place in the pantheon of literary greats."

My battered Coronet paperback edition of this book which was originally published in 1972 is 572 pages long. And just about the best testimony that I can give for this thick tome is that I've read it countless times since I first came across a copy of To Serve Them All My Days more than two decades ago while rooting through the library of the very English couple who were my legal guardians when I was at boarding school in Britain.

Also, that at various times in my itself rather tumultous life, this obviously lovingly written socio-historical saga about a shell-shocked First World War veteran turned boarding schoolmaster has been the book that I've turned to for comfort, inspiration and solace.

Like many other favorite books, that which a blogger called Kittman has named as the best purchase (s)he's ever made contains more than its fair share of passages which really "speak" to me (and I think might to many of you too). Then there are the wonderful descriptions of various of the protagonist, Welshman David Powlett-Jones's pupils, colleagues, elders and lady loves: many of which make me chortle every time I read them; but others of which are more likely to draw out a sentimental tear or more from my eyes.

To quote again -- but this time at greater length -- from the rave review of To Serve Them All My Days on the BBC website which I had earlier alluded to:-

The appeal of this book lies in the well-crafted central characters who are instantly recognisable as real people...[For all this though, w]hat sets this novel apart is the minor characters. Often in other novels, these characters become ciphers with no other role than to move the story along. [But] Delderfield treats these people with extraordinary care by giving them backgrounds and by reintroducing them later in the book to tie up loose ends or to reveal unexpected traits that make them fully-rounded human beings.

In closing: I do tend to the view that it's best to leave the final words about a book to its author. In this case, I've decided after some deliberation against providing excerpts from the story itself to give you a flavor of Delderfield's writing style and general authorial proclivities. Instead, I'm trusting that the accompanying A Qualified Disclaimer which I'm copying out in its entirety -- but am taking the liberty to break up into three paragraphs for easier reading! -- will do a better job of providing some evidence plus insights as to how come this book and author are as special as I believe that they are:-

Almost every writer of fiction inserts the obligatory disclaimer in his work and some, I suspect, do it with tongue in cheek. The truth is, of course, no one ever invented anyone. Every character in fiction is an amalgam of factors drawn from the author's memory and imagination and this is particularly true of To Serve Them All My Days.

No character here is a true portrait, or caricature, of any master or boy I ever encountered at my six schools and one commercial college, between 1917 and 1929, but aspects of people I met are embodied in all of them, and I have even used nicknames I recalled, as well as several scholastic backgrounds. To write fiction in any other way would be to divorce oneself from reality and what kind of book would emerge from that?

In using, say, an average of six schoolmasters and six boys for every one between these pages, I intended no slight or criticism, only to portray life at school as I saw it up to 1940, when I entered my twenty-ninth year. I was glad to leave five of the six schools but there is one I still regard with the greatest affection. I leave it to the reader to sort the wheat from the chaff.


R. F. D.
February 1971

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

How well traveled are you?

A short blog entry today (written as I wait for a couple of friends from Kuala Lumpur to come over and visit); and one inspired in part by another KL-based friend telling me just yesterday afternoon that a mutual friend of ours -- one who currently makes her home in Canada -- had visited this blog and told her that it seems to contain a lot of travel-related entries... ;)

How well traveled are you? For an answer to this question, try out the linked quiz that's courtesy of Blogthings, a site with a whole bunch of interesting quizzes -- including ones with themes like "What writer should you be?" (The answer I got? Joke writer!!), "How observant are you?", "How Machiavellan are you?", "What age do you act?", "What's your holiday stress level?" and even "What is your Star Wars horoscope?" and "Are you a Mac or a PC?" (Not user, mind, but computer itself!)!

And should anyone be interested, the following is the answer that I got:-

Your Travel Profile:
Image

You Are Very Well Traveled in the United Kingdom (75%)
You Are Very Well Traveled in the Northeastern United States (71%)
You Are Well Traveled in Africa (50%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in Canada (40%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in Asia (38%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in the Southern United States (38%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in Western Europe (36%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in the Western United States (32%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in the Middle East (25%)
You Are Somewhat Well Traveled in the Midwestern United States (25%)
You Are Mostly Untraveled in New Zealand (17%)
You Are Mostly Untraveled in Australia (13%)
You Are Untraveled in Eastern Europe (0%)
You Are Untraveled in Latin America (0%)
You Are Untraveled in Scandinavia (0%)
You Are Untraveled in Southern Europe (0%)

All told, a quite accurate assessment to my mind, actually! :)

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Wannabe (Meme)

Over on his Cultural Snow blog, Tim Footman's written up an interesting post which lists seven things he's wanted to be together with seven occupational posts that he's held. At the end of it, he mused that "A meme beckons, methinks." And I have to say that I felt compelled to respond to his encouragement of "Off you go"!

So here's going ahead and offering up the following contributions to what I hope will be a fun and enduring round of blog-tag:-

Seven things I have wanted to be:

* Film festival programmer
* Travel writer
* Efficiency expert
* Newspaper columnist
* Fire fighter
* Professional footballer :o
* Professor of English (what I wrote in an essay as a 9 year old!)

Seven things I have been:

* English as a Second Language teaching aide & tutor
* Archaeology survey and excavation crew member
* Cultural anthropology instructor
* Museum consultant
* Television executive
* Tourism strategist
* Magazine research editor

And for those of you readers without blogs of your own: Here's inviting you to divulge what would be on your own lists over at this blog entry's Comments section! :)

Friday, February 9, 2007

The Gender Genie gets it wrong! ;(


As I think that many -- if not all -- of you are aware, I'm of the female persuasion. After all, as a perusal of the About Me section of this blog will show, I've hardly gone out of my way to hide the nature of my gender.

When I first started regularly contributing to discussions and such on the internet, however, I -- and Brian, the webmaster of Hong Kong Cinema: View from the Brooklyn Bridge (the site where I made my debut as a Hong Kong movie reviewer) -- had thought that it might be safer and such for me to not be all that open about my gender. Hence my writing there -- and in subsequent cyber locales, including originally on the Mobius Home Video Forum (before the institution there of a policy which requires posters to use their real names) -- as YTSL (which, if anyone wonders, are my initials).

At some point during it all though, Brian told me that, the way he saw it, my writing (style) couldn't help but give away the fact that I'm female. And I have to say that e-mails I received from certain of my readers -- specifically, those containing lines like "I imagine that you look like The Bride with White Hair..."(!) or "I have this image of you as like Maggie Cheung in Irma Vep..."(!!!) -- looked to go some ways towards confirming this. ;D

Hence my surprise when I tried out The Gender Genie -- a program designed by a couple of professors to predict the gender of an author -- and on each of the three times that I tested it out (and with three different excerpts from this blog at that), got identified as being male! (Though, in truth, I did have some advance warning by way of a piece about this program by Virginia DeBolt entitled New Data Shows I'm Male and the comments by female readers who had gone out and given The Gender Genie a twirl themselves.)

So...here's asking for some willing volunteers from among this blog's readers to ask The Gender Genie to figure out their gender. And since I thus far only know of females who have submitted samples to be analyzed, here's especially calling on those of the male gender to give it a go and then report back about the results via this entry's Comments section! :b

Thursday, February 1, 2007

Fun, happiness, reality and laughter

Click here to participate in a Global Happiness survey which seeks to determine such as the happiness level of the world along with the world's happiest and saddest countries.

A caveat: It's hard to put much stock by this poll when -- at least when I checked the results (which have a day-to-day as well as "all time" options) -- it lists the United Kingdom and Malaysia both as the happiest and saddest countries today! This notwithstanding, I reckon that some of the responses which are available for perusal in the site's
Comments sections can make for interesting or amusing (or both) reading... ;b

On a more serious note: A while back, a friend passed me a clipping from a March 2006 issue of Hong Kong's South China Morning Post (a newspaper which I used to regularly read on-line until -- boo, hiss! -- it initiated its "paid subscription" policy). Entitled Cheer up, we're not so miserable, the article interviewed two academics, one Australian and one Hong Konger, about their specialty subject: i.e., "finding out how happy we are, and why".

Among this pair's findings had been that whereas people in developed western countries (including Australia) tend to rate their well-being at an average of 7.5 on a scale of 0 to 10, Hong Kongers gave answers that averaged out at closer to 6.5 on the same scale. However, the researchers argued, cultural differences -- more than actual reality -- may explain that (point) discrepancy.

At the same time, culture -- in particular, a cultural tendency to report themselves higher on the well-being scale -- was pinpointed as a factor which accounted for Nigerians topping the happiness rankings of the multiple country survey carried out by that which calls itself the International Wellbeing Group.

That last conclusion got me thinking of one of my favorite books of all time. Return to Laughter: An Anthropological Novel by Elenore Smith Bowen (the nom de plume of one of my anthropological heroes, Laura Bohannan) is based on the socio-cultural anthropologist's fieldwork experiences among the Tiv of Nigeria.

A classic of anthropological literature which was first published in 1954 (and a genuinely good read), it contains the following meditations of laughter and its true meaning for the people who ended up teaching a lot of life lessons to the book's anthropologist protagonist:-


The cripple must be a fool not to realize . . . A fool? Or mad. In such a situation one must either laugh or go mad, laugh at the reality or be made in the illusion...

In an environment in which tragedy is genuine and frequent, laughter is essential to sanity. Such laughter is neither callous nor humorous...


These people know the reality and laugh at it. Such laughter has little concern with what is funny. It is often bitter and sometimes a little mad, for it is the laugh under the mask of tragedy, and also the laughter that masks tears. They are the same. It is the laughter of people who value love and friendship and plenty, who have lived with terror and death and hate.

To be worst,

The lowest and most dejected thing of fortune,
Stands still in esperance, lives not in fear;
The lamentable change is from the best,
The worst returns to laughter.