Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers
Add topic| Main page | Discussion | Guidelines | Content | Assessment | Article Alerts | Participants |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, several other WikiProject Numbers talk pages redirect here. |
We should "adopt" the pages on square roots of integers.
[edit]There exist pages, containing information that demonstrates notability, for the square roots of 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. These should be incorporated into Wikipedia project numbers, they are clearly within our realm of interest. We should consider whether lists of square root values would make sense. Riverskip (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, definitely, but I thought they were already included? Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:52, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Is bullet point style or paragraph structure better for list articles?
[edit]Currently the short descriptions of numbers from 301 to 399 on the 300 page is organized into sentences, while the 400 and 500 pages have lists. While I am generally a fan of paragraph style, some of the factoids, especially if they involve equations, are confusing in paragraphs. I also think that there should be consistancy with the lists at least up through 900. The lists for 600, 700, 800, and 900 are very confusing and I am happy to update them, but I don't know whether the 300 page or 400 and 500 page format is preferred. Riverskip (talk) 23:24, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- Clarification, I mean the lists on the 400 and 500 pages have a list of bullets for each number. Riverskip (talk) 23:26, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- IMO, I would say paragraph style is better, with line breaks for certain equations. Allan Nonymous (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
needed discussion of article creation criteria
[edit]Please consider contributing to the following discussions of article creation criteria.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(numbers)#h-Friedman_is_not_a_good_justification_for_an_article-20260724211800 Riverskip (talk) 21:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
discussion of routine facts explanations
[edit]Please consider contributing to the following discussion
Wikipedia talk:Notability (numbers)#c-Riverskip-20260806195600-Can a list of specific routine facts be added? Riverskip (talk) 20:07, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:161#Requested move 9 August 2026
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:161#Requested move 9 August 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Certes (talk) 16:14, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
