Skip to content

branch-4.1: [fix](iceberg) execute empty static overwrite and stabilize info_schema timezone test#62344

Merged
yiguolei merged 3 commits intoapache:branch-4.1from
suxiaogang223:codex/fix-empty-static-overwrite
Apr 11, 2026
Merged

branch-4.1: [fix](iceberg) execute empty static overwrite and stabilize info_schema timezone test#62344
yiguolei merged 3 commits intoapache:branch-4.1from
suxiaogang223:codex/fix-empty-static-overwrite

Conversation

@suxiaogang223
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

This PR fixes two regression issues on branch-4.1.

  1. Iceberg static partition overwrite was incorrectly treated as a no-op when the source query was optimized to an empty relation.
  2. test_information_schema_timezone was flaky around information_schema.rowsets.

Solution

  • Allow empty-source execution for Iceberg static partition overwrite so the transaction still reaches overwriteByRowFilter().
  • Add a FE unit test covering empty-source static partition overwrite deleting only the matching partition.
  • Stabilize the information_schema.rowsets regression case by waiting for a rowset result, ordering deterministically, and guarding nullable timestamps.

Test Result

  • DISABLE_BUILD_UI=ON DISABLE_BUILD_HIVE_UDF=ON DISABLE_BE_JAVA_EXTENSIONS=ON ./build.sh --fe

@suxiaogang223 suxiaogang223 requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner April 10, 2026 09:48
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@suxiaogang223
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

run buildall

@suxiaogang223
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 7.14% (2/28) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@yiguolei
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

skip buildall

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Apr 11, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 9c7db5b into apache:branch-4.1 Apr 11, 2026
28 of 32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/4.1.0-merged reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants