User talk:MarioProtIV

In regards to the deadliest tornadoes thing is redundant, then if they shouldn't be on there, I advise you check the lone grove and pitcher tornadoes

November 2025

Your recent editing history at Hurricane Melissa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:59, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Tracks

I have a ton of SWIO tracks I've been working on this week that I will get uploaded tomorrow and Sunday. Noah, BSBA^Talk 04:38, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Hurricane Maria. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. FourNoddlers (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to 2025 Atlantic hurricane season. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Jasper Deng (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2025 Fifty-Six–Larkin tornado

Hello, MarioProtIV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Fifty-Six–Larkin tornado, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Archiving your talk page

Your talk page is now excessively long. You should set up archiving. Let any of us know if you need help doing so. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:58, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Mario, ignoring this message, and countless others, is not appreciated, and this pattern has continued despite your having had years since the last time I called you out on this. This is not acceptable. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:43, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Honestly I’ve been pretty lazy not having archived this sooner lmao. I would always have the thought then ended up forgetting about it. I’ll set up archiving either tonight or tomorrow because 300 sections on my talk page does not bode well at all.

edit: saw that recent message as I typed this out and yeah I’ve had a bad habit of doing that which isn’t healthy. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 05:45, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

With that idea in mind I manually archived up to last month. Tedious yes, and I am gonna have to get a bot to do that going forward most likely, so I will definitely reach out to you guys soon regarding auto-archiving by bots since I haven't really done that yet. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 05:57, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Denying recognition on 2020 US election page

Got you, will do that then. DartsF4 (talk) 19:46, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Yeah. Not worth spending energy on them when the very fabric of their "supposed" request comes from a deprecated fake news source. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 20:14, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Temporary account viewer

With how much you deal with LTAs you should consider getting this permission. It helps a lot with sockpuppets. Cutlass^Ciera 17:05, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Just came here to say the same. I'm not allowed to grant it without you asking for it (or I definitely would). Simply ping me here or make a request at WP:PERM/TAIV. Toadspike [Talk] 11:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@Toadspike:  Done, filed a request. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 14:34, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Giving Mario TAIV is a very bad idea. User has been topic banned from weather for 16 months, still can’t close discussions (and violated his topic ban) and is a very likely candidate to abuse this tool. ~2026-34808 (talk) 16:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Both restrictions were lifted. This message is a series of personal attacks. Toadspike [Talk] 17:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Andrew5, nice to see you’re still socking! What a shame. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 17:59, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Having dealt with a bit of Andrew5's sockpuppetry with Hurricane Chris (2018) earlier today, we all could use the help. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:41, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Just WP:DENY and quietly revert, report, and ignore, that’s what I’ve been doing every time I’ve gotten fake block messages pretending to be from an administrator (usually one with CheckUser or oversight). Though I’ve also been quietly reporting it to the administrator they were impersonating in most cases. I’ve told at least one global sysop about it. Just ignore it. When Andrew5 (or whoever else is behind it) gets tired enough, they’ll quit. I learned that the last time I got trolled over A5. Hurricane Clyde 🌀^{my talk page!} 01:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Anniversary MarioProtIV 🎉

Hey @MarioProtIV. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 12 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a blessed New Year. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 15:30, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Rejoining WP:WPTC?

In case you didn't know, you aren't in WP:WPTC since your T-BAN. GiftedIceCream 01:20, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Fixed. I’ve been de facto in the community since my TBAN ended in September 2023 but seeing since I never re-added my name it wasn’t de jure until now. Thanks for the heads up! MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 05:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

MOS:INTRO

Please refrain from adding claims that the article's body doesn't state, as per MOS:INTRO. As the lead section is a summary of the most important content of the article body, also per MOS:INTRO, any information in the lead section must be stated somewhere in the article body and attributed to a reliable source. Since the added material is not verified, the burden is on you and Animebrad to cite it. It doesn't matter whether similar material is mentioned in other articles; if it lacks a source, don't mention it. FourNoddlers (talk) 14:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your participation is requested

Talk:January 2026 North American winter storm#Winter Storm Fern mention in lead Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 23:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2011 Smithville tornado Darnell Collums.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2011 Smithville tornado Darnell Collums.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

ITN recognition for January 2026 North American winter storm

On 1 February 2026, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article January 2026 North American winter storm, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 14:32, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks.

Hey Mario,

Thank you for closing the discussion on the X men talk page. However, I do have a mention to make.

I have reasonable evidence that user @ ~2026-66670-9 is a sockpuppet of @Jinnifer.

I have recorded this evidence on the sockpuppet and ANI discussion boards

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jinnifer#Suspected sockpuppets 2

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sockpuppets of Jinnifer

Alien456 (talk) 17:45, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Just make sure you don’t clog up discussions like that because it became very long for no reason other then the back and forth which is not helpful at all. Next time when dealing with suspected socks, you should ignore them and simply report them as they will only serve to cause disruption. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 17:48, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Okay, thank you! Alien456 (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on February 2026 North American blizzard

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page February 2026 North American blizzard, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:39, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2025–26 North American winter

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025–26 North American winter, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:36, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2025–26 North American winter

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025–26 North American winter, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:45, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern in regards to the deadliest tornadoes of

if that sort of information is redundant and not needed, I recommend you look at the 2008 pitcher and 2009 lone grove tornadoes cuz I was only doing it to the others cuz of them. 001Firestorm (talk) 01:04, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

It’s redundant and don’t belong there. Those two examples shouldn’t have them either. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 01:10, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

happy we settled this. Thank you for letting me know that they were not supposed to be there. 001Firestorm (talk) 01:19, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. I don't know who did that so I just did it like the others as I thought it was needed 001Firestorm (talk) 01:12, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas

You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:15, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your changes to WWII

Hello there

Please don't try to force through your changes over the objections of other editors. Two editors have objected to your changes to the info box so it is now up to you to seek consensus on the article talk page. Please see: WP:ONUS. If you are going to try to make changes to the info box it would also be a good idea to achieve competence in source coding. You can practice in your sandbox until things turn out the way you want them to.

Thank you Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 07:49, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

hello there

Two editors agree that we shouldn't bold the words allies and axis in the info box, so you are in a minority of one on this. Instead on insisting, you should seek to build a consensus for your preferred option on talk.

Thanks Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:11, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Suffix

Regarding this edit, the documentation specifically indicates that the suffix parameters are to support footnotes; why do you believe the parameter should not contain footnotes? Nikkimaria (talk) 00:23, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

I meant it is standard practice to list the record without footnotes. The template specifically says “other content” as well which the current practice falls under. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 00:41, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Mario, I suggest you stop reverting Nikkimaria's edits. They have been an editor since 2005 and has over 200,000 edits, plus they are a regular reviewer on FAC and is the FAR coordinator, so they know how the rules work on Wikipedia. I don't want an edit war over this. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:52, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

I’m more specifically reverting the small font which was the main issue at hand initially. I’m not trying to start an edit war but just removing what was violating MOS:SMALLFONT. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 00:55, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

I mean, I'm not fussed about footnoting or not as long as the SMALLFONT issue remains solved, but I don't agree with your assertion that footnoting is incorrect. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:00, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Perhaps I phrased it wrong. I meant to say that generally for reader’s convenience, if a record low or record high stat is achieved in a tropical cyclone we have used the suffix parameter to note that below. There’s nothing wrong with the footnote, but for reader’s purposes when they first view the page we have kept that as it has been so it’s easy for them to see. Yes the small font was an issue and I went and fixed most of them. I hope that makes more sense so we don’t blow a fuss over this :) MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 01:04, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Hurricane Ioke

Don't delete NHC box bro, the metrics of NHC and JTWC differ due to the two regions they monitor. H-FinaL-FantasY-H ^{- Talk} 02:56, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Ugh I forgot the reversion deleted that on accident. My bad! MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 03:47, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Diaz EF4 draft

Hey got some good news, published the draft you created for the Diaz EF4 of 03/14/25 The Rochelle EF4 (talk) 01:25, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

It is still not finished and is still a CFORK as it is so I am really hesitant about it being published - in fact someone tried moving it before and I moved it back to draft space because of that. If you can revamp it to the quality of your Valley View article you recently did, then I can accept it still being in mainspace. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 01:41, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

I’ll look into that thanks for your input The Rochelle EF4 (talk) 01:42, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2025 Diaz tornado

A tag has been placed on 2025 Diaz tornado requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

John B123 (talk) 15:08, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Wichita Falls Article

THANK YOU for actually making an article on the tornado

I originally had a draft for it but some AI bro tried to finish it early, and it just, demotivated me to an insane degree. Thank you for actually making an article on it though Quincy Gordon (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

No problem! The large detailed summary from TheAustinMan was really beneficial in that it was more then enough for a standalone article. So that really helped move things quickly. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 06:42, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Sorry!!

Facepalm thanks for the reverts. I effed something up and you caught my mistakes! Sorry about that... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:53, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

@Zackmann08: It’s ok. Also I would highly suggest undoing the most recent edit on Template:Infobox weather event with regards to the Met history part, as the “as [name]” part (which I assume you intended for use in articles on two related TCs), ends up messing up individual tornado infoboxes in outbreak articles as the name parameter used to state the locations the tornado went through, ends up writing out the entire thing as a result. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 03:48, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

2019 Atlantic Hurricane Season

Greetings, the reason for my edit on that page was to remove a false claim that the season was the first since 2007 to have two Category 5 hurricanes, as the 2017 season also had two Cat 5s. Would leaving an edit summary have prevented my edit from getting reverted? —DoubleDeputy D (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Tornado outbreak of June 7–9, 1953 RM

Requesting your comment on the RM for Tornado outbreak of June 7–9, 1953 since you last moved it. Please let me know if you also got the ping from the message I added to the RM discussion, because I'm not sure it worked as I've never pinged someone like that before. Thanks! NomzEditingWikis (talk) 10:19, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

A Minecraft Movie Squared

Hey, there's no other thing called A Minecraft Movie Squared. Could you fix it so that it doesn't have (film) in the title? SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:25, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

You seem to have moved it at the same time I was doing so, and so it basically made my target a redirect instead. I filed a technical request to remove “(film)” as I’m unable to do so and was meant as a temp fix. Sorry about that! MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 16:27, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

It's all good SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Template:Infobox weather event small

Something in your edit to this template today has caused ParserFunction errors in a number of articles that use Template:Infobox Hurricane Small (which redirects to it)—specifically, when the number in the |Pressure= parameter is preceded by a "less than" symbol. See 1921 Atlantic hurricane season for a couple of examples. I know nothing about template coding; could you investigate what the problem may be? Deor (talk) 19:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Ah I see the issue. It’s something with the conversion to inHg. I’ll try to fix it. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 19:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

It’s an easy fix, just add the |Pressurepre = < parameter above the pressure parameter (while removing the < from that as it now considers it invalid). MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 19:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

That seems to work, but now there's another problem. The infoboxes aren't displaying the field name Pressure before the numbers; instead, they're displaying {{{Pressure}}} and no numbers at all. Look at the infoboxes for the individual hurricanes in 1893 Atlantic hurricane season, for example. Deor (talk) 23:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Ugh. I’ll take a closer look at it when I get home as I’m currently not near a computer to easily fix it. I sandboxed this a lot earlier making sure everything was good before merging, but I guess some errors slipped through the cracks. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 00:02, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

If it's of any help, many of the affected pages can be seen in the list at Category:ParserFunction errors in the "0–9" section. Deor (talk) 00:07, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Any progress on this? Deor (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

@Deor: Fixed, at least I hope it is. A quick look seems to me its working properly now. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 16:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Well, the relevant pages have been cleared from Category:ParserFunction errors, so I guess the ParserFunction problem has beeen addressed; but the field name Pressure no longer exists. Look at the infoboxes in 1901 Atlantic hurricane season, for instance; the pressure information appears as part of the Peak intensity field, separated from the wind speed by a semicolon. Was that your intention? Deor (talk) 17:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

God damnit. No, because I’m trying to have them not show up if they’re not being used, mainly for the use with winter storms. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 18:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Actually I just tested the show preview thing on an older revision of the template and the pressures always been separated by a semi-colon, so it’s actually correct for once I think. With storms with an unknown pressure it’s always been excluded since nothings typed into the parameter. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 18:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Then I suppose all is well. Thanks for your efforts. Deor (talk) 18:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 7 § Untitled Superman sequel until a consensus is reached. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 03:44, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Draftification of article 2026 Union City tornado

This article was ready for mainspace and published by a confirmed user, if it is published again do not under any circumstances undo it The Rochelle EF4 (talk) 17:18, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Please read WP:NTORNADO. It has not been 6 months yet which is the amount of time needed to pass for it to meet WP:LASTING criteria. This was specifically brought up at the discussion about deleting/merging it in the first place. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 18:04, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Explain how several tornado articles got published within weeks then The Rochelle EF4 (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

There are certain cases in which WP:IAR is invoked, primarily if the death toll is in the double digits (Somerset-London), or exceptional intensity (even months afterward for a rural tornado - see Enderlin). Some of these though should not have been published, because of LASTING. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 18:11, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

👍 The Rochelle EF4 (talk) 18:16, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 25 § Untitled Spider-Man: No Way Home sequel until a consensus is reached. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 17:46, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This is for all your contributions to the encyclopedia, especially those related to the 2026 Iran war. Pachu Kannan (talk) 06:22, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Request

Hey @MarioProtIV: I saw you created the album article for Swag Live from Coachella (Weekend I). Could you please create the album article for Swag Live from Coachella (Weekend II), which came out a week after that? I can and will go in to add some things to those album articles. Thank you! ~2026-40071-28 (talk) 16:10, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

@MarioProtIV: did you get my message? ~2026-41574-94 (talk) 14:08, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Sorry I’m just now seeing this. I’ll create it as soon as I can, just have been preoccupied in other spaces lately. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 14:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

@MarioProtIV: can you create it soon so I could edit? ~2026-44994-38 (talk) 20:38, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

This request constitutes ban evasion by User:Rishabisajakepauler. Don't assist banned editors. Binksternet (talk) 00:24, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 00:09, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Mistake

Although I already apologized on the movie's page, I also wanted to do so directly with you. I realized that we were each advocating for a different version and that both were actually correct. The second time you added it—when Yasha's contributions were also included—I didn't check everything thoroughly and reverted the edit immediately. It was a blunder that shouldn't happen again, as I usually review everything that gets added. But once again, I am sorry for any inconvenience or frustration this situation may have caused you. I hope you have a good day. Best regards. Marco camino 10 (talk) 01:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

No worries you’re all good. Stuff happens! MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 01:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Belligerents of the Iranian War - PFLP and SSNP-L Volunteers

On the Lebanon page 2026 Lebanon war in support of Hezbollah (in addition to Amal Movement, Islamic Group of Lebanon, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad) in the infobox there are (with information notes and sources) among others:

• PFLP
• SSNP-L volunteers

  ---

~2026-36818-47 (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Did you read the article about Fast 12?

Diesel says that there's a possibility of Fast 12. ~2026-43271-11 (talk) 02:23, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

How do you make your tornado outbreak maps?

Hello i just want to know how you make your tornado outbreak maps on some articles like this one for example .

Sorry if i bother you in any way. Del2426 (talk) 01:25, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

I mainly make those maps by using QGIS, then downloading the zip file for the specific date containing the shp of the SPC outlooks which are able to be imported into QGIS. You also need the tornado touchdown points from here as well. I'm not near my computer at the moment so either later today or tomorrow I can post a more comprehensive tutorial, but this is pretty much the essentials you need. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 16:51, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Alright thank you! Del2426 (talk) 18:59, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Hi MarioProtIV! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of Draft:Avengers: Secret Wars. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Draft talk:Avengers: Secret Wars, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. adamstom97 (talk) 17:12, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Avengers Endgame Encore poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Avengers Endgame Encore poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review - Issue 1 (September 1, 2026)

Volume I, Issue 1, September 1, 2026 ←(Previous issues) · 1 · 2 → The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review This is the first edition for what will hopefully be a monthly newsletter involving Wikipedia's weather articles, including the severe weather and tropical cyclones projects. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject. If you wish to receive or discontinue your subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. Past editions can be viewed here.

Featured Content Since the beginning of 2026, the following featured articles were promoted: Hurricane Camille Hurricane Frances Hurricane Joaquin Timeline of the 1996 Pacific hurricane season Timeline of the 1997 Atlantic hurricane season Timeline of the 1998 Pacific hurricane season Timeline of the 2014 Atlantic hurricane season Timeline of the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season Development, Reminders, and Updates After a recent edit war and subsequent discussion, tropical cyclone season articles should only be updated when advisories are officially released, and not to use the ATCF In an attempt to limit edit wars over tropical cyclone images, the image guidelines were updated, allowing for images to be within 12 hours or 10 knots of peak intensity. The WikiWeather Notability guidelines has been updated, although discussion continues about individual vs. tornado outbreak articles and how to handle annual tornado articles. The NCDC Storm Events database recently updated, which changed all URL's. Although Eoline (talk · contribs) changed most of them, there might be some old ones that still need to be fixed. Series of weather topics that need expansion The following articles are the earliest in a series of lists/articles, and including the gap going back to the previous entry in the series. These are articles that need to be written. 1850 Atlantic hurricane season - every Atlantic hurricane season article from 1850 to 2024 is rated good article or better, but the 1840s Atlantic hurricane seasons is start-class 2007–08 North American winter - there is a 90-year gap between Winter of 1917-18 to 2007-08 2020 droughts and heat waves - there are yearly heat wave lists for 2018 and 2020-2023, but not 2024-present 2023–24 Asian winter - there are only three yearly Asian winter articles List of United States tornadoes from January to February 2007 - there is a four-year gap between Jan-Apr 2003 US tornadoes to 2007, and a three-year gap going back to Jan-Feb 2000. Weather of 2000 - there is a 14-year gap between Weather of 1985 and 2000, and another gap of 39 years going back to 1946 Tornadoes of 1946 - there is a four-year gap between Tornadoes of 1942 and 1946, and another gap of 14 years going back to 1928 Tropical cyclones in 1991 - there is a 13-year gap between Tropical cyclones in 1978 and 1991; 1977 TC yearly list also exists Of note, the yearly "Weather of YYYY" could be a useful parent article for every weather article. For a well-written (and well-sourced) example, see this timeline in the Weather of 2023 article. Image of the month Devastating floods, possibly caused by a glacial collapse, hit the China–Nepal border on August 26. These floods destroyed numerous settlements and killed over 1,000 people (with thousands still missing). The above image is a Landsat 9 view of debris flow from the floods. Selected new articles The following articles were written/published this year. It excludes any of sub-articles within Weather of 2026. 1878 Haiti–Florida hurricane (written by CapeVerdeWave) Climate change in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (written by Chidgk1) Floods in China (written by Calisyrre) List of Arizona tornadoes (written by Eerier Fish) List of Japan tornadoes (written by many) List of South Atlantic tropical and subtropical cyclones (written by many) List of Utah tornadoes (written by ELLEWEATHERRRR) List of Vietnam tornadoes (written by Tarou-Rai) Potential tropical cyclone (written by Quxyz) Tornadoes in Mississippi (written by ChrisWx) Tropical cyclones in 1978 (written by ViridLeWiki) Tropical cyclone Merge-a-thon Longtime editors and lurkers might have noticed an uptick in the number of article mergers this year. A discussion in December 2025 talked about articles for fish storms or were otherwise had minor impacts. As Hurricane Noah summarized, "if a storm isn't being discussed after the fact for meteorological notability and impacts were minor or nil, there shouldn't be an article. Since then, 8 featured articles and 76 good articles have been merged. In a recent AFD, Quxyz mentioned their own minimum threshold for a tropical cyclone article (1,000 words and 20,000 bytes). Help requested for specific topics There are a few ongoing projects that are needed in Wiki-Project weather, separate from any requested articles. After years of discussion on standardizing the colors for tropical cyclone tracks, there is an ongoing project to replace the roughly 2,200 track maps across the hundreds of storm/season articles. One of the members helping with the track maps, 2003 LN6 (talk · contribs), estimated that "about 15–20% of the historic track maps are recolored properly, but progress is being made. I have personally been working on the North Atlantic tracks, but I have observed the work of many others as well." Another member working on older Atlantic and season track maps, JasonHo1222 (talk · contribs), asked, "can I be quoted in the newsletter too?" Thanks to 2003 LN6, JasonHo1222, and all of the other users helping with this task. The tropical cyclone season button bars have outdated coding that should ideally be replaced. The talk page goes into detail, but basically swapping out two parts of the template ("List of storms" and "Statistics" sub-articles, which we don't have anymore) in favor of the yearly "Weather of YYYY" and "Tropical cyclones in YYYY" articles. List of tropical cyclones producing snow - inspired by the recent Hurricane Lala that produced snowfall in Hawaii, there is a consensus that such an article could be useful. Comments or suggestions? This is the first of what will hopefully be a long-running newsletter. If you have any suggestions or complaints (such as them being in a different order in the section header), click on the previous links or try the newsletter talk page.

Eoline 13:16, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multiverse (Marvel Cinematic Universe), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daredevil (Marvel Comics) was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

September 2026

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to File:Spider-Man actors.jpg. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 02:15, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multiverse (Marvel Cinematic Universe), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daredevil (Marvel Comics) was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review - Issue 2 (October 1, 2026)

Volume I, Issue 2, October 1, 2026 ←(Previous issues) · 2 · 3 → The Monthly Wiki-Weather Review Issue 2: Electric Boogaloo Edition This is the second edition the monthly newsletter involving Wikipedia's weather articles, including the severe weather and tropical cyclones projects. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject. If you wish to receive or discontinue your subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. Past editions can be viewed here. Editors: Hurricanehink (HH), Eoline (E)

New Featured and Good Content Since the last issue, the following became good articles : 2001 Pacific hurricane season 2008 Prattville–Millbrook tornado 2012 Branson tornado Selected new articles The following articles were written/published in the last month (or were missed). It excludes any of sub-articles within Weather of 2026. 1991 Springfield tornado 2012 Woodward tornado 2013 Shuqualak Tornado 2025 La Sal fire tornado List of Turkey tornadoes Tornado outbreak and derecho of June 21–22, 2026 Tornadoes in the United Kingdom Tornadoes in Massachusetts (missed in previous newsletter, published in May but only recently added to the Template:North America tornadoes) Tornado outbreak of July 8–9, 1927 Tropical Storm Polly (1992) (missed in previous newsletter, published in August) Development, Reminders, and Updates The NCDC Storm Events database recently updated, which changed all URL's. Although E changed most of them, there might be some old ones that still need to be fixed. The Atlantic hurricane reanalysis was updated on September 16 for 1971–75. Several editors helped to update the articles, although some articles still need to be updated, such as adding summaries of the new systems to the season articles. A recent discussion found consensus for removing most TCFA's (tropical cyclone formation alerts) from typhoon season articles. As the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) is not the official agency for the basin, and many season articles are too long, this bit of information is generally not needed. Exceptions unclude when it's the JTWC peak for a system, such as a JMA-only TS. There is also a discussion about removing the JTWC term "Super Typhoon", partly due to PAGASA using that term, and because JMA uses "Violent typhoon". This would affect infoboxes and the leads of some articles. Future goals including using JMA data for track maps. There is a discussion about removing non-European tornadoes from the annual "List of European tornadoes", stemming from a discussion about tornadoes in Turkey, Russia, and north Africa that are not technically part of Europe. If you see new editors (and even current editors), remember not to be bite-y, and try and keep things civil and welcoming. Some people might edit for the first time when there is a major weather event in the news. It can be helpful to reach out to users directly. HH sometimes use a phrase like, "I see you have an interest in weather articles. While your edit might technically be true, it did not include a source. If you're interested in editing, I suggest you create a username so you can join the hundreds of editors working on the thousands of hurricane/tornado/blizzard/drought/haboob articles." (OK maybe just one of those weather types) Image of the month - Hurricane Polo offshore Mexico Hurricane Polo became the second-strongest recorded Pacific hurricane on September 22, when Hurricane Hunters recorded a minimum central pressure of 892 mbar (26.3 inHg). Polo attained Category 5 status three times before weakening and striking northwestern Mexico twice. Tasks/projects from previous newsletter - Issue 1 had a section for the series of weather articles. This included seasons or weather events by year, such as from Weather of 1946 to 1985 and from 1985 to 2000. Other ongoing tasks include updating tropical cyclone track maps, button bar templates, and changing the coding for the season infobox template to allow for violent typhoons. WCNA 2026 by E The 2026 edition of WikiConference North America was held in Edmonton, Canada, throughout the week of September 21, with at least one project member in attendance. Main topics included discussion of Wikimedia administration, WikiPortraits, and Wikimedia Commons. Interested editors are invited to read through this presentation, which was presented by User:Z1720 during the conference; it discusses how to write featured articles. A more complete weather encyclopedia Although Wikipedia isn't specifically a weather encyclopedia, it fulfills that role to an extent. The "List of [weather events] by area" series is getting finished one by one, even if there are still a lot to go. The following areas are among the most complete: United States (6) - Droughts, Floods, Hurricanes , Tornadoes, Snow, Wildfires California (4) - Hurricanes , Floods, Tornadoes , and Wildfires Arizona (3) - Hurricanes , Tornadoes, Wildfires Australia (5) - Bushfires, Droughts, Floods, Tornadoes, Tropical cyclones Canada (4) - Fires, Floods, Hurricanes, Tornadoes Europe (4) - European windstorms, Floods, Tornadoes, Tropical cyclones India (4) - Floods, Heat waves, Tornadoes, Tropical cyclones China (3) - Fires, Floods, Tornadoes Indonesia (3) - Floods (Jakarta only), Tornadoes, Tropical cyclones Turkey (3) - Drought, Heatwaves, Tornadoes Many areas could have a variety of lists. There's a draft for Tornadoes in Florida, which, if published, would join the above list. There is also a draft for Snow in Texas, which would also add Texas to the above list, assuming you counted the dab and quasi-article that is the List of Texas hurricanes (which you could help by adding climatology, the deadliest Texas tornadoes, and a list of (E)F5 tornadoes in the state). If you're interested in working on one of the potential location-based lists of weather impacts in an area, be bold and try it (maybe starting with a draft), or ask HH for help. The Merge-a-Thon Sweeps Up Tornadoes The previous newsletter mentioned the tropical cyclone merge-a-thon in which around 100 storm articles have been merged. There has also been an increase in proposed mergers of tornado-related articles to their parent tornado outbreak. Some of the main arguments have been about sustained lasting coverage (six months after the event), and whether the individual articles are a content fork from the outbreak article. There remains a need to codify tornado notability standards, with regards to outbreak and single tornado articles. The Paradox of Tolerance by HH It's important to assume good faith and be open-minded/welcoming as we build a more perfect encyclopedia. HH admits he has pushed his own preferences a bit too much at times. Discussions need to remain civil. But the Paradox of Tolerance can lead to bad outcomes. For instance, there has been a rise in articles written by AI, which is not allowed. Now that Wikipedia is over 25 years old, it has its fair share of people who were blocked, including sockpuppets trying to disrupt the positive legacy we've all built. That does not mean to assume that all new users are either using AI or are sockpuppets! Most editors started just like you. Still, if it seems like users are baiting you to engage in discussion, that might be in bad faith. At those times, be sure to take a deep breath, and remember that there's no deadline. Sometimes, a troublesome user will out themselves and get blocked, whether due to AI-writing or other bad habits. "If it looks/swims/quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. If you have evidence someone is abusing more than one Wikipedia account, see Sockpuppet investigations. Random fun thing found during Wikipedia research While working on Hurricane Agnes, 12george1* found this legendary document from the NHC archives: That the guest editor cut the tip of his middle finger of his left hand off this evening making a salad, and has left blood all over the typewriter, and that this finger is the one that hits all the e's, d's, c's and a few other things and is now very sore. I quit! !!!!! @@@@@ ##### $$$$$ %%%%% ¢¢¢¢¢ &&&&& ***** (((((( Don't be like this guy and make sure you're all careful editing! *Due to a mishap in the previous newsletter, HH would like to formally apologize for linking users in the newsletter, and causing users to receive dozens of notifications. From now on, only the newsletter editors will be linked (so you can message us if you wanted). Comments or suggestions? This is the second edition of what will hopefully be a long-running newsletter. If you have any suggestions or complaints (such as them being in a different order in the section header), click on the previous links or try the newsletter talk page.

Eoline 13:19, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

October 2026

You appear to be engaged in an edit war at 2025 Atlantic hurricane season. An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly revert each other's changes. Please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, use the talk page to discuss how the page can represent consensus among the editors involved. Here is some advice on how to do this. If discussions get stuck, you can request a third opinion, ask for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution.

Edit warring can result in being blocked from editing, especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts within 24 hours on one page. Undoing any other editor's work, in whole or in part, involving the same or different material, is a revert. You can still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not violate the three-revert rule should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
There was a long, drawn-out discussion over what the opening sentence should say and WP:OSE is not an argument. Your only option is to open a new discussion about changing that consensus. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:15, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

New cross-language page link: Super-Neptune

A new page Наднептун on the Ukrainian Wikipedia has been linked to the page Super-Neptune, which you created, via Wikidata (Q28453859).

You will not be notified about future links to pages you created. To opt in to these notifications, follow the opt-in instructions.

NervousBot (talk) 15:34, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I don’t know why that troll has it out for you, but cheers for fighting the good fight! Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 15:36, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Inclusion of Isaias and Simon

Hello MarioProtIV. I'd like to propose a middle ground on whether Isaias and Simon belong in this article, since I think both of our positions have weak points.

Snow as the sole criterion. I understand the concern, but the article already includes the late September nor'easter, which has no snow data (the "max snow" field is empty). So snow doesn't appear to be a requirement in practice, and a snow-only rule would also exclude other winter-type events such as wind storms or cold snaps.

Damage as the sole criterion. I'll concede that damage alone isn't enough either. Isaias and Simon already have coverage in the Atlantic and Pacific hurricane season articles, and including every damaging storm would dilute the scope of this article.

Proposed criteria. I suggest a system be included if it meets at least one of the following:

1. It is a winter-type or extratropical storm (e.g. a nor'easter), regardless of snowfall.
2. Its remnants interact with a winter weather system or produce wintry precipitation.
3. Reliable sources explicitly tie it to that winter season's weather.

Application. Under these criteria, Isaias would only qualify if its remnants merge with a frontal system and produce wintry weather; so far, sources describe heavy rain, tornado threats and power outages. Simon had not yet affected the United States at the time of writing, so it cannot be assessed yet.

Compromise. Until then, I propose a brief mention (without a full section, infobox or image) pointing to the main storm articles, and revisiting it once the remnants' effects are documented. Would that work for you? If we can't agree, we could ask for input at WT:WPW.Markocortesa2 (talk) 20:23, 10 October 2026 (UTC)

@Markocortesa2: Your criteria is pretty much how we have been following it for years (silently I guess), but Simon and Isaias do not meet that due to its nature. The May 2025 nor’easter you linked before had mountain snow associated with it which is why it was included. Isaias does not (nor does any forecast or modeling) and is representative of the hurricane season rather than the winter season, which is why I strongly believe it doesn’t belong . Fall/spring nor'easters are okay because they are winter-type lows and can occur before winter starts. Again I’m fine with the remnants of Rachel being mentioned once it produces the mountainous snow in the Northwest since that looks to be associated with it once it gets there. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 21:16, 10 October 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thank you for adding the parameters for violent/very strong typhoons to the tropical cyclone season infobox! That's been a longstanding wish list for me. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:24, 11 October 2026 (UTC)

No problem! I read the discussion and thought it’s been sitting there for a while might as well get the ball rolling. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 19:00, 11 October 2026 (UTC)

You brought up the need for older seasons to have "super" typhoons pre-1977, but you changed the template so "intense" reads "Very strong typhoons". Can you add "super" so it reads "super typhoons (JTWC)"? We can use that for older seasons, and potentially for new seasons (if we can add unofficially in parenthesis after it). You might've missed the comment on 2026 PTS from the editor pointing out that older typhoon seasons now read "very strong", but some seasons should still be able to list "super typhoons". ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:30, 11 October 2026 (UTC)

Oops yeah forgot about that, I’ll take care of that on the infobox. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 22:28, 11 October 2026 (UTC)

Isaias pressure

I waited for the Isaias analysis to be fully dissipate to see if the NHC would revise the pressure figure from the earlier report. However, they retained the 959 mbar figure in the Tropical Cyclone Report (TCR), indicating that the 958 mbar reading was likely an error. Therefore, the intensity value listed in the TCR stands as the official figure. H-FinaL-FantasY-H ^{- Talk} 06:08, 13 October 2026 (UTC)

Your edit warring on Commons

I don't know if you check your talk page on Commons, so I'll also drop this here:

Kindly knock it off with the image warring on Commons. It's incredibly disruptive and unnecessary. And also completely unacceptable. You've also already been warned about this by Jasper Deng. It does not bode well that you're continuing to do this. If you wanted truncated tracks, please make separate files (although these will not be suitable for replacing full track images). Thank you. BlueHypercane761 🌀 (talk) 07:04, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Hurricane Madeline (2016) for merging into 2016 Pacific hurricane season

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurricane Madeline (2016) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into 2016 Pacific hurricane season.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Madeline (2016) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

GiftedIceCream 16:06, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Typhoon Champi 2026

The page Typhoon Champi 2026 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 20 October 2026 (UTC)