Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/January 2026

Keep

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was kept by PresN via FACBot (talk) 16:17 16 January 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:35, 16 January 2026 (UTC).

---

List of retired Pacific typhoon names

Notified: Jason Rees, WikiProject Weather

I am nominating this for featured list removal because there's several typhoons that are left unsourced, especially the 2020s typhoons. According to Wikipedia:Featured list criteria, it seems like it fails at Number 3, part b; "Statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations." Unless the issue gets fixed, these unsourced claims are seriously hurting the FA status of this article. Hoguert (talk) 00:19, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

@Hoguert: Quick note, you tagged Jason Rees and WikiProject Weather as having been notified, but I don't see that you actually did notify them; please do to increase the chance that this list gets fixed. --PresN 12:02, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

I am aware of this FLC having seen it on my watchlist and will see what I can do in the coming days to bring it up to scratch.Jason Rees (talk) 16:37, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Update: I have done a lot of weeding on the List of retired Philippine typhoon names and this list today and am pleased to report that the death/damage totals from the 2020s are all sourced/referenced, while all retired names and intensity information is sourced. On the overall list in particular, the damage totals will need further work to incorporate death/damage totals from outside of the Philippines, but that's a job for another night.Jason Rees (talk) 02:14, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

I will withdraw from this after the issues are addressed, and so far, you're doing a good job fixing the problems. Hoguert (talk) 00:15, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Update - Over the last week or so, I have done more and more weeding on the Philippine list and now have all the Philippine death/damage totals from Reming (Durian) in 2006 sourced back to the NCDC. Some of these death/damage totals have already been incorporated into the overall article, while I plan on getting them into the main overall article over the next few days.Jason Rees (talk) 10:26, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

"The name Amuyao was meant to replace Malakas, but because PAGASA selected the name to replace Aghon, which was stricken off the naming list of 2024 as a local name, the name was then replaced by Amuyag." Still unsourced. Roy, Mireille, Rananim, Xangsane, Durian are unsourced. There are typhoons in the 1990s, 2000s, and Linfa in 2020 that don't have damage/death toll estimates Hoguert (talk) 11:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

@Hoguert: Patience is a virtue since as a part of the FLC, I am trying to ensure that all death/damage totals presented are sourced, accurate and do not include economic losses.Jason Rees (talk) 11:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Update: I currently feel like I have brought the majority of the death/damage totals to a point where they are sourced, verifiable and more or less correct. Over the next few days, I will be going over the naming history to ensure it is correct.Jason Rees (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Okay, I was about to pull back from my FLC until I realize there's some duplication source issues with the article, specific sources 4, 78 and 59, 60 GrenadinesDes (talk) 02:23, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

@GrenadinesDes: I have fixed the duplication issue with 69 and 60, 4 and 78 were already fixed, could you withdraw this now? User:Easternsahara_{review this} 01:09, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara @Jason Rees There's still some areas of unsourced, including "At the 46th session of the Typhoon Committee, it was noted the name Vicente appears on both the tropical cyclone name lists for the Western North Pacific and Eastern North Pacific. In response to this duplication the name Lan was chosen as replacement for Vicente on the Western North Pacific name list to avoid potential confusion." paragraph and Roy's section in pre 2000s. Once those are addressed ill withdraw GrenadinesDes (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Over the last few weeks, when time has allowed, I have been doing some research through various newspaper archives to try and tell the story of typhoon naming over the WPAC better. As a result, it has emerged that the names Hazen and Pamela were also retired, but it seems to have been lost to history.Jason Rees (talk) 13:41, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

If you can't cite a source, it is better to remove it. Assuming that the names have been retired and replaced without a source backing that up is WP:OR. See the essay on NOTTRUTH User:Easternsahara 22:15, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara: Yeah... I didn't assume anything about Hazen and Pamela being retired and have cited a source in the article but for clarity's sake this is the newspaper article from the Pacific Daily News that shows me that the names Hazen and Pamela were retired.Jason Rees (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

The initial issues raised have been addressed, as has the Hazen/Pamela issue, and there being no consensus to remove this list, closing as kept. --PresN 16:17, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been kept, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Delist

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was delisted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 14:06 29 January 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:35, 2 February 2026 (UTC).

---

List of Grand Rapids Griffins players

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey

The list was last updated in 2022, so all players who joined since then, as well as statistics from the last four seasons, are missing. Шахматист2025 (talk) 20:27, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

• Delist: It really hasn't been all that significantly updated since the article creator stopped in 2016, and has a number of errors in it. While I'm not philosophically opposed to such lists for minor league teams, with the heavy turnover such teams have, it takes a great deal of effort to keep them updated, and that effort seldom is sustained for long. This probably shouldn't have been feature listed in the first place, and certainly is not worthy of the same now. Ravenswing 20:55, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Pinging @DetroitFan7 if you want to handle this. The Kip ^(contribs) 20:56, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Delisting - multiple years out of date, and no work done to fix. --PresN 14:06, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was delisted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 14:06 29 January 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:35, 29 January 2026 (UTC).

---

List of World Heritage Sites in Spain

Notified: User talk:Tone, User talk:Easternsahara, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World Heritage Sites

The article is currently in a very disorganized state, with serious mismatches between the table headers and their corresponding content. In the first half of the list, the "Year listed" and "UNESCO data" columns appear to have been swapped, while in the latter part, the "Year listed" column instead displays locations. This seems to be an error caused by an incomplete update to the table format.

In the Tentative list section, only the names of the sites are provided. While that might have been acceptable when the list was promoted in 2010, current standards—following the examples of newer FLs such as List of World Heritage Sites in Italy—require this section to be presented in a proper table with additional details and descriptions.

Therefore, I believe the article no longer meets the criteria for a FL due to its insufficient content and structural issues, and its delisting should be considered. Nebulatria (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

I agree, I'll see if I can get some time to work on this list the following weekend. User:Easternsahara_{review and this} 23:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Delist I probably will not have enough time to work on this until February, if even then. Some of the main list's sites need expansions in their descriptions, some need trimming and the entire tentative list needs to be restructured, with 35 new paragraphs added and a table as standard with other lists. Other people are of course welcome to work on the list. While I would wait until I could work on it usually, this is a high traffic list (comparatively to other WHS lists) and we should not mislead the readers into thinking that this is a good list on Wikipedia. User:Easternsahara 07:44, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

I think we should wait around a little bit more. User:Easternsahara 21:02, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

I started working on this list a while ago to bring it up with the recent FL standards, since it was promoted before I started working on these lists systematically (as well as Madagascar, Cuba, Peru, and maybe some other). It definitely need work, which will be done eventually, it is just a question whether it is better to delist and renominate when fixed or wait until it is fixed. I may assist but cannot commit to fix it fully. --Tone 13:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

User:Nebulatria: What is your take on the quality of this article at this point? It has been nearly two months since you opened this FLR. Just FYI, User:Easternsahara appears to no longer be with us (not sure what happened there). Pinging User:Tone. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

The three items without descriptions need some at minimum; the tentative list needs expanded into a full table to match other FLs, which is the bulk of the work remaining. --PresN 16:22, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Delisting - no major work has been done to fix the issues after several months. --PresN 14:06, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was delisted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 16:47 22 January 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC).

---

Moons of Uranus

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Solar System task force

Per the determination at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Moons of Neptune/archive1 that these articles about moons do not qualify as lists. It is a decent article, but should go through GA or FA instead. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Delist per my my comment User:Easternsahara_{review this} 01:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

• Delist per Easternsahara. JHD0919 (talk) 02:34, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Following the precedent of the Saturn/Jupiter lists, delisting. --PresN 16:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was delisted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 16:47 22 January 2026 FACBot (talk) 23:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC).

---

Moons of Saturn

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Solar System task force

Per the determination at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Moons of Neptune/archive1 that these articles about moons do not qualify as lists. It is a decent article, but should go through GA or FA instead. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:55, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

I think a larger discussion with more visibility to Wikiproject Astronomy, perhaps a request for consensus may be warranted. However, I have consulted people on the discord, and they don't seem to regard these types of articles as lists, which is understandable. In terms of content, there is only so much that a page can include without becoming an article. So, I would delist as the list isn't the main focus of this page. Also, I don't think it would be warranted to split the actual list of moons out, per WP:NOPAGE. User:Easternsahara_{review this} 01:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

• Delist per Easternsahara. JHD0919 (talk) 02:34, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Following the precedent of the Saturn/Jupiter lists (and the sibling Uranus nomination), delisting. --PresN 16:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.