
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
Fixes #236
Pretty much similar to #414, but with an added test to show the issue.
Based on what @mathiasbynens said in that PR #414 (comment)
It seems like the original fix in #414 was correct. I have also written a test that shows the correct action.
If you are the owner of the test (aka you own the 1st revision), only you (with the
isOwnflag set to true) should be able to "update" an existing test. Otherwise you are not the owner and you should only be inserting your test cases into a revision.The reason for all the tests having "empty" test cases is because the code would fall into the UPDATE sql statement every single time regardless of whether you're the actual owner or not because each test always passes a testID unless a new test case is added to your revision of the test.
E.g. every test has the two basic test cases, and so if you try to create a new revision and only edit those 2 test cases, you'll get a blank test revision. If you add an extra test case in that revision, then that one won't have a
testIDand thus will make an INSERT call and this new revision will only have the new test case.The additional test case shows that if you are the owner, you make updates if the test cases exist, and if you are not the owner you only make inserts.