Jump to content

User talk:Rod57

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Downlink Volume 4, Issue 8

2008

[edit]

His a fake wanting people to hate. Telling lies don't trust him. He abuses his wife

damage to oxypnictide

[edit]

Managed to repair damage to oxypnictide caused by "patent" edit today. Rod57 (talk) 03:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC) Rod57 (talk) 16:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi no problem! The article was a realy useless stub and after searching literature I found out that the hype for a new superconductor in 2008 was somewhat stupid because the material is a known superconductor since 2006. But for the next few months there will be a lot of groups doing the stupid game of mixing all kinds of Oxides with all kinds of arsenides and dope it with flouride to break the record. This will bring no further scientific knowledge, but brings you onto nature or science. So the article will grow! But know I will go back to the friends at Phoenix and the TEGA instrument, to look what they have.--21:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
You've been very quick to call things stupid. I don't think either use was justified. Let's see what results arise in the next year. Rod57 (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not the subject is stupid, but the work to mix all kinds of things with all kinds of things to get into nature. The subject will create also good science, when people try to understand what the underlying physics are and if cuprates and oxypnictide have the same physical background. Upto now only a class of substances was found, this is OK. To synthesise all members of the group is no science, this work for a robot! I had to do stupid work like this for my PhD, thats why I do not like it!--Stone (talk) 06:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Powder in Tube

[edit]
Image

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Powder in Tube, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. [...] You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised [...] Woland (talk) 22:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have explained why I disagree on the talk page, and tried to improve the article. Rod57 (talk) 03:47, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
The PIT content was later merged by ? into Superconducting wire which seemed to unbalance that article. Rod57 (talk) 15:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Gold coin edits

[edit]

Hi there,

I do appreciate the comments you have made to Gold coin, but I think your edits will be stronger based if they were sourced. I encourage you to find sources and to improve the section you changed by adding them. Let me know if you need help.

Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 13:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Miguel, The 3 or 4 statements that have been queried were there before my edit (which was mainly to add a subsection heading and move one paragraph out of the subsection. I think the original contributors could easier justify their contributions. Rod57 (talk) 17:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
True, but it would be very difficult at this stage to find who did those contributions. Since they have been challenged (asking for sources) the whole section could be removed in the future if sources are not provided. I thought I would let you know, since you might help to put it back on track. Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 22:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for letting me know. I've provided a source for two of the challenges in Gold coin#Counterfeits. The other two seem too obvious to need a source. Do you think they could be untrue or just not worth mentioning ? Rod57 (talk) 14:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hi again, I have removed one of your sources, since this is a site that basically clones content from Wikipedia, hence it is not reliable (is the same as sourcing the same article). Once thing to remember is that Wikipedia is read by any sort of folks, so what for you might seem obvious, for others may not. I would suggest to find sources for it or to remove it since it can be seen as speculation without the proper sources. Let me know if you need help. Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 15:08, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
thanks, & I do need help. When you insert the fact template at the end of a paragraph are you challenging the entire paragraph, or just the last sentence or clause ? (It might help to put the words being challenged into italic.) I have split two of the paragraphs at what I hope are logical places. I still feel most of the content you have challenged is easily verified if anyone doubts it (although it seems self evidently true). Could you move this discussion (or rather your explanation of what exactly you are challenging) to the article talk page so others can contribute ? I dont mind what you do to the article itself. Rod57 (talk) 16:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Brick-wall filter

[edit]
Image

A tag has been placed on Brick-wall filter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Terrillja (talk) 22:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've tried to argue on Talk:brick-wall filter that it is useful and better than the proposed merge, but maybe there is an even better way without messing up electronic filter. Rod57 (talk) 18:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
It now redirects to a section in sinc filter - OK. Rod57 (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

PHARM

[edit]

Hey, given your numerous edits to medication-related articles you may be interested in joining WikiProject Pharmacology. JFW | T@lk 07:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

thanks, I'm now a 'participant'. Rod57 (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Image

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ASA404, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lungevity.org/l_community/viewtopic.php?t=36544. 03:18, 13 December 2008

New content provided. Rod57 (talk) 04:00 13 December 2008 (UTC)

2009

[edit]

Citation suggestion

[edit]

Hi. thank you for your contributions to the transcription factor article! In case you haven't already seen this, check out the template filler tool. Given a PMID, you can quickly create a fully formatted {{cite journal}} template that can be directly copied and pasted into a Wikipedia article. Using this tool can save you a lot of work and insure that citations are displayed in a consistent way. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

thanks for the hint. I'll try to use a citation tool. Rod57 (talk) 02:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of ALD518

[edit]
Image

I have nominated ALD518, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ALD518. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JFW | T@lk 21:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have given some reasons to keep at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ALD518 Rod57 (talk) 00:28, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
You asked me to reconsider my delete, but I am not the least convinced, and have explained why. You claim UK newspaper coverage: let's see it DGG ( talk ) 02:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your comments. I can't find the newspaper cutting so I'll withdraw that claim for now. Rod57 (talk) 15:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Be interesting to see if it appears on deletionpedia, if deleted here. Ah, I see it has survived anyway. --Michael C. Price talk 16:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Methotrexate

[edit]

Thank you for adding a brief "History" section. Historical information is always welcome, and most drug articles are sorely lacking in this respect. Best wishes, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vitamin D

[edit]

It was 10,000 not 100,000 IU/d that was in the statement I recalled. It is still in the article. Here is the paragraph. Some of the diagrams in the refs are interesting, and may answer your questions.

Exposure to sunlight for extended periods of time does not normally cause vitamin D toxicity.[1] This is because within about 20 minutes of ultraviolet exposure in light skinned individuals (3–6 times longer for pigmented skin) the concentration of vitamin D precursors produced in the skin reach an equilibrium, and any further vitamin D that is produced is degraded.[2] According to some sources, maximum endogenous production with full body exposure to sunlight is approximately 250 µg (10,000 IU) per day.[1] According to Holick, "the skin has a large capacity to produce cholecalciferol", and he produces some data demonstrating that

"[W]hole-body exposure to one minimal erythemal dose of simulated solar ultraviolet radiation is comparable with taking an oral dose of between 250 and 625 micrograms (10 000 and 25 000 IU) vitamin D."[2]

  1. 1 2 Vieth R (1 May 1999). "Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety". Am J Clin Nutr. 69 (5): 842–56. PMID 10232622.
  2. 1 2 Holick M (1995). "Environmental factors that influence the cutaneous production of vitamin D". Am J Clin Nutr. 61 (3 Suppl): 638S–645S. PMID 7879731.

--Michael C. Price talk 19:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, the diagrams in the refs were v useful. Rod57 (talk) 04:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of "Antrin"

[edit]
Image

A page you created, Antrin, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling. ... Thank you. Coldplay Expért Let's talk 02:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy delete tagging was in error and has been rescinded. Rod57 (talk) 13:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

2010

[edit]

International Space Station DAMs

[edit]

Hi there! Thanks very much for your addition to the ISS article regarding recent debris avoidance maneouvres. I've moved and merged your paragraph into the 'Orbital debris' section (which is where the rest of the DAM material is found), but I was wondering if you could please verify the reliability for the sources you used; the ISS article is featured, and so all references have to be very reliable to maintain the quality - if you could provide a rationale for them on the talk page, or provide alternatives, that'd be great. Colds7ream (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've add a couple of reliable refs to the International_Space_Station#Orbital_debris section, but the original NASA report of 1.7 km seems to have moved so replaced it with ref to Orbital Debris News which shows graph. Rod57 (talk) 23:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Johanna Budwig

[edit]

Someone is proposing that the English Johanna Budwig article should be deleted. You might wish to offer your opinion. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 10:29, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Keep eg as notable enough for search on ACS to find 2 docs. Rod57 (talk) 01:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Our 'friend' is continuing his campaign. I'd be obliged if you could keep an eye on the page. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 06:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Rod, I've added my comments to Talk:Johanna Budwig. I'd be interested in your views, particularly on restoring the other ACS reference and tackling the Nobel Prize canard. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 06:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deletion nomination of Talk:Thames Archway

[edit]
blanked page
blanked page

Hi Rod57, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Talk:Thames Archway. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{db-author}}. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{db-author}} tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. ... To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=FrescoBot}} somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot (msg) 00:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deletion was desired as main page moved to Thames Archway Company. Rod57 (talk) 13:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comparison of UK recessions

[edit]

You might like the link I just added to the external link section of List of recessions in the United Kingdom :

--Michael C. Price talk 22:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Interesting curve for the 1930-1934 recession. Rod57 (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]
Image

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. Courcelles (talk) 22:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Pending changes seems to be empty at the moment but I'll keep checking it. Rod57 (talk) 08:35, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dermatology

[edit]

Any interest in dermatology? If so, we are always looking for more help at the Dermatology task force, particularly with the ongoing Bolognia push. I can e-mail you the login information if you like? There is still a lot of potential for many new articles and redirects. ---kilbad (talk) 21:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, but I'm more interested in cancer generally than dermatology specifically. Rod57 (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Parkinson's disease (possible neuroprotective effect of Q10)

[edit]

I have reverted your last addition: while the reference you provide is reviewed is only a primary source. Secondary sources used in the article have already balanced your source with others and concluded that there is not enough evidence to support the neuroprotective effect of Q10. Per WP:MEDRS a secondary source prevails. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 13:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Could you possibly point me at the later sources/studies please. Do they show the 2002 study was faulty ? Rod57 (talk) 13:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Take a look at the Nice-guideline page 53, which talks about two articles on Q10 (one being your addition) and outlines some of its problems finally concluding "The small neuroprotection trials performed with co-enzyme Q10 in PD so far have been encouraging, but further evidence is required before it can be recommended routinely." and "Co-enzyme Q10 should not be used as a neuroprotective therapy for people with PD, except in the context of clinical trials."
Additionally in Obeso-2010: "Several molecules have been proposed as potential neuroprotective agents against Parkinson's disease. Molecules that reduce dopamine cell death include monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors (selegiline, rasagiline), anti-apoptotic agents (TCH346, CEP-1347), glutamate antagonists, promitochondrial drugs (coenzyme Q10, creatine), calcium channel blockers (isradipine) and growth factors (GDNF)113. However, none of these molecules has definitively shown neuroprotective effects in clinical trials114. This may indicate the ineffectiveness of these compounds, but may also be a consequence of the limitations of clinical-trial design115—use of the wrong dose, recruitment of too broad a patient population or selection of inappropriate endpoints". Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 13:46, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have been working in this article for some months and any help is welcomed. However I am trying to use only high quality secondary sources (reviews in peer-reviewed journals) which are the preferred sources per WP:MEDRS. I would greatly appreciate if you could back up any assertions introduced in the article with this kind of sources. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 13:51, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I don't have access to the full text of Obeso. I'm not sure that its dismissal of CoQ10 is justified since the 2002 study was randomised and did show a statistically significant effect at 1200mg/d. Secondary sources may be preferred but the primary source seems justified by the data it provides. It's only a clinical study - not a medical recommendation. Most disease articles mention treatments under investigation. Rod57 (talk) 14:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sadly the PD article doesn't seem to link to the NICE guidelines so I haven't read them, but the quote you give seems to support and even justify my addition rather than oppose it. Can you say what problems they found with the 2002 study ?
It is cited many times: see those citations begining with "The National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions, ed (2006)". We follow exactly the sources when we say: "Several molecules have been proposed as potential treatments.[40] However none of them has been conclusively demonstrated to reduce degeneration in clinical trials. (This includes Q10). Feel free to bring here a review that says that it has been proven its usefulness.--Garrondo (talk) 14:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I feel Garrondo's evidence supports my addition rather than his deletion of it . I will come back to this issue if/when I get time. Rod57 (talk) 14:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Obeso full text Obeso 2010 does not reference Shults 2002. Parkinson's disease Rod57 (talk) 15:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Garrondo above quotes only part of Obeso 2010, which continues "coenzyme Q10 (ref. 119) and selegiline—have had positive outcomes in terms of reducing the progression of motor deficits in early Parkinson's disease." Gypsydoctor (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

TNBC disambiguation

[edit]

Hi, I saw you move/disambiguation work. I must say, I don't think it was done correctly.

Firstly, there's a factual issue. "TNBC" was the correct name of the programming block; it was never called "Teen NBC". Even though that's what the name came from, the initialism was never spelled out, even partly. Therefore moving it creates a factual error of the title, and needs to be reverted to ensure that readers aren't mislead.

Secondly, a disambiguation page is unneeded. As there is only one other article on the page, which is at a title other than the initialism, a disambiguation hatnote using the {{about}} template would not only suffice, it'd be more accurate.

So in short, TNBC should be the article on the programming block, as it is the only factually correct title, but that article should be edited to include the hatnote:oknazevad (talk) 20:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

A separate disambiguation page is unneeded. oknazevad (talk) 13:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the feedback. I thought other uses of TNBC would eventually require or justify a disambiguation page. Would a better name for the "Teen NBC" page be "TNBC (something)" eg "TNBC (TV channel)" ? or would it be better to have a "TNBC (disambiguation)" page ? Rod57 (talk) 13:59, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
A disambiguator should only be used when both articles have the exact same name. As neither of these do, there's no need for a parenthetical disambiguator. And we really don't need a disambiguation page for two entries, especially when one doesn't have the actual title "TNBC (something)". If there's something else that may, eventually, require a dismabiguation page, then it can be created. In short, a hatnote will do. [Oknazevad]
That doesn't seem to be how disambiguation pages are used in wikipedia.
If/when a disamb page is needed what should we do :
a) Have TNBC with hatnote to "TNBC (disambiguation)" ?
b) Have "TNBC (TV channel)" and TNBC being the disambiguation page ?
I guess (a) since TNBC was created first - or shouldn't creation order matter ?
BTW I'd rather fix it in one go since there seem to be at least 5 notable uses of TNBC Rod57 (talk) 10:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hm, depends on whether any of the other uses are exactly known by the initialism "TNBC". If not, then TNBC should be the programming block and the others should be at TNBC (disambiguation) which would be linked by a hatnote at the programming block page. If any of the others are known only by the initialism, then we have to consider WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.oknazevad (talk) 22:08, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I dont think any are known only by the initialism so I'll make TNBC (disambiguation) as you suggest. Rod57 (talk) 01:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC) ... I can't do the move as I'm not an admin so I've edited the move request into the Teen NBC talk page. Apologies for the trouble. Rod57 (talk) 02:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

NDM-1

[edit]

Hi, can you add something about patient zero to the article. Thanks WritersCramp (talk) 19:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The early NDM-1 cases don't seem to have infected each other so the concept of patient zero seems wooly so I'd rather not. Rod57 (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Click Chemistry

[edit]

I noticed this edit to the page Click chemistry and am unsure of whether or not to move the comment from the main page to the talk page, or delete it being misinformation. Since you've edited this page before recently, I'm wondering if you know. -WarthogDemon 18:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'm not an expert on click chemistry and am not even sure the comment is correct (since it's not clear to me which is the final product) but I think a suitable comment should stay on the main page as most readers won't look at the talk page. Someone should probably ask the creator of the image to clarify/correct. I'd be inclined to put the comment as italics and in brackets () to hint that it is a later comment. Rod57 (talk) 23:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Multiple myeloma

[edit]

Concerning these edits, could I persuade you to format the references you added into citation templates, to make the references more consistent with the style used in the remainder of the article? It is also unnecessary to mention in the text that your source was published in a particular year, and probably even that it was a review. JFW | T@lk 21:16, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've made the refs into cite templates (I often do but was a bit rushed when I did these). I've left the "2009 review" comments (eg in Multiple_myeloma#Maintenance_therapy) as I feel they are helpful and seem the easiest way to indicate the date and type of source, which given the patchwork nature of many WP medical articles, many readers and later editors may find useful as medical opinions evolve over the years. Rod57 (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edits to MRSA - minor or not - September 2010

[edit]

Image Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Although the removal of the spurious space was, indeed, minor, the addition of a link does not appear to meet the criteria outlined in WP:MINOR. — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 01:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Apologies for violating WP:MINOR. However I have queried your reversion of my edit at Talk:Methicillin-resistant_Staphylococcus_aureus#What is notable research. Rod57 (talk) 08:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
My [removed] edit was mention of a phase I trial. Better I guess to wait until phase II reports encouraging preliminary results. - Rod57 (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

H5N1

[edit]

Viruses and diseases are two different things; therefore H5N1 flu refers to Transmission and infection of H5N1 and not to the virus itself, unless there is no separate article on the disease(s) caused by the virus. WAS 4.250 (talk) 22:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Glembatumumab vedotin

[edit]

Hi! regarding this edit: As far as I know, MedicalNewsToday isn't Public Domain and so copying text from there counts as a copyright violation, so I removed the text. If I am wrong and the site is PD, please feel free to re-add it. Thanks, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 20:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Apologies; I thought (from other articles) that attributed quotes were acceptable. I've tried to add a summary of the extra info. Rod57 (talk) 00:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your work with this article! Under certain circumstances (that I've never fully understood myself), short quotations are acceptable. Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources seems to limit this to "one or two sentences". Anyway, I'd only use quotes if absolutely indispensable to be on the safe side – for example, a paragraph from a literary author to illustrate their style. I don't think it's ever necessary to use a quotation from a scientific source; you can always paraphrase. Happy editing! --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 07:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Multiple sclerosis

[edit]

Regarding your last edition: since it is only based in a recent primary study in a mouse model it is probably too premature for inclusion in main article. I am going to move it to the pathophisiology subarticle. If there was a review supporting its claims it would may merit inclussion in main article. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 07:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

As you wish. FWIW this was mentioned in the UK national press.
( My change was moved to Pathophysiology_of_multiple_sclerosis#Acrolein.) Rod57 (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I mean a secondary reliable source (review in a peer-reviewed journal indicating that it is a notable research direction). Media press is not reliable to see the importance of an article. They have an even higher recentism bias than wikipedia.--Garrondo (talk) 07:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
That's what I assumed you meant by 'review'. I agree press not reliable on importance of news. Rod57 (talk) 13:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Moved it (hydralazine re acrolein) to Therapies under investigation for multiple sclerosis which seemed more appropriate. Rod57 (talk) 14:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pancreatic cancer

[edit]

Talk:Pancreatic_cancer#Chemotherapy re nelfinavir - My addition and earlier content removed. I replied, (now at Talk:Pancreatic_cancer/Archive_1#Chemotherapy) but was article fixed up ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

No - but update Nelfinavir#Potential_anti-cancer_activity first. See what results from phase 2 for cancer. - Rod57 (talk) 04:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

2011

[edit]

APA -> Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma -> Conn's syndrome

[edit]

Hi there. In this edit you added Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma to the APA dab page. I had a look at the article it redirects to, and it does not mention "Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma", and obviously it should, as that's where it redirects. But I'm a bit hesitant as to the right place. Is it a synonym of Conn's syndrome? Can you please add it in the correct place? Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I think it is a synonym : Primary aldosteronism says "When it occurs due to a solitary aldosterone-secreting adrenal adenoma (a type of benign tumor), it is known as Conn's syndrome". : I had Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma redirect to Conn's syndrome (which redirected to Primary aldosteronism. Unless there is a technical reason (eg multiple redirects that dont work) why this should not be done I think this was better (clearer) than your redirecting directly to Primary aldosteronism because in the future Conn's syndrome may change from a redirect to an article in its own right.
Are you arguing that there are non-adrenal aldosterone-secreting adenomas (in which case Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma could say that as well as linking to Conn's syndrome) ? Otherwise, I think what I did was reasonable and your change could be confusing. What do you think ? Rod57 (talk) 20:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Sadly, Wikipedia does not support multi-redirects, so Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma cannot redirect to Conn's syndrome. Even if I left this redirect, a bot will "correct" it. That's a technical problem that we have to live with.
I am not arguing anything. My understanding of the life sciences is in a high school level, so I don't even understand half of what you said. All I said is that I think the term "Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma" should appear somewhere in Primary aldosteronism, and knowing nothing of the subject I'm at a loss as to where to add it. If you say it's a synonym for Conn's Syndrome, I'll add it there. Have a look at Primary aldosteronism and see if I did it correctly please. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 21:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Your change makes what was there before somewhat confusing so I have added the bold term in a separate sentence instead to avoid any confusion. Rod57 (talk) 13:41, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Very well. Best regards and happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 13:58, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image
Hello, Rod57. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 23:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\

Speedy deletion nomination of Reactor period

[edit]
Image

A tag has been placed on Reactor period, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 12:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

It got deleted before I could add {{hangon}}. It was a temporary redirect to Talk:Boiling_water_reactor_safety_systems#What_is_reactor_period. Best to find a suitable main page to add the definition to, then make the redirect go there. Rod57 (talk) 11:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sequence of thymosin beta-4

[edit]

Hi,

Might be a tad pedantic, but the protein will be 43 aminoacids (no N-term methionine). N-term is acetylated, though I've no idea if that can be shown in single letter code. Even more pedantic - this is the human protein. All placental mammal orthologues are identical, marsupials have E8Q and amphibians differ even more. I'm not editing at present because not being an experienced Wikipedian, I'm unsure whether this level of detail is appropriate. Jgedwards (talk) 23:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi J, Thanks. IMO pedantic detail is fine in an encyclopedia. I wasn't aware of the n-terminal acetylation and lack of methionine and was just trying to follow the source [to give an idea of the protein size]. I'll add that this is the sequence in humans. Do you have a source for it being for placental mammals ?
There's no need to be experienced to edit. Level-of-detail/pedantry can [also] be discussed on article talk pages so others can contribute. Thanks again. - Rod57 (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

2012

[edit]

PARP inhibitor article

[edit]

"AZ" occurs in your recent change, but is not defined in the article. Thanks -- Jo3sampl (talk) 23:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Apologies. I've linked it to Astra Zeneca to clarify. - Rod57 (talk) 15:17, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Cost of Simvastatin

[edit]

You added a statement to the Simvastatin article in 2008 stating, "In the UK in 2008 the typical per patient cost to the NHS of simvastatin is approx £1.50." Since then, someone tagged your statement with "Citation needed" to request a citation to provide authority for the claim. Do you have one? I would like to read a reliable source on monthly cost for this drug. Thank you. — O'Dea (talk) 23:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

BBC : NHS overspends on statins. Jan 2008 says £1.39 a month (2008). NHS CKS July 2012 says £1.37/month in 2012. I've updated the article with both references. - Rod57 (talk) 11:27, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. — O'Dea (talk) 22:25, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Olive oil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linolenic acid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. [...] Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since linolenic acid arguably should not be flagged as a disambiguation page and in this case the mixture is what is intended by the sources I have left the link in olive oil. - Rod57 (talk) 22:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback re List of artificial objects in heliocentric orbit

[edit]

{{talkback|Talk:List of artificial objects in heliocentric orbit|Inconsistent re Upper stages|ts=21:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC)}}
Hi Rod. A long time ago you placed a comment in this Talk page. I just responded. Cheers. N2e (talk) 21:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Not sure a Category is the best way to collect defunct upper stages. - Rod57 (talk) 14:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


Ordering of sections in medical articles

[edit]

We have a guideline here . Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 05:03, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

The guideline says " The given order of sections is also encouraged but may be varied, particularly if that helps your article progressively develop concepts and avoid repetition".
In most cases, including colorectal cancer it flows much better IMO to go from Diagnosis to Management, and to have Prevention (at least primary prevention) immediately before Epidemiology. I might suggest that on the guidelines talk page one day. - Rod57 (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
It was clear from the guideline talk page Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles/Archive_6#Order_of_sections that others thought it would be better to change the order of the sections in the guideline, and to emphasise that the order was not mandatory. - Rod57 (talk) 18:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
nb talk:MEDMOS/Archive_7#WP:MEDORDER.3F - Rod57 (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
requested talk:MEDMOS#Please_change_the_.27encouraged.27_sect - Rod57 (talk) 16:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Jmh649 : Please explain your reversion

[edit]

Hi Jmh649, You reverted my changes to colorectal cancer saying 'references required'. Are you asking for references in this article (maybe because you doubted my additions were true) or because they weren't easy to find in the linked articles ? Also, I'd be grateful, if you revert my changes, if you'd mention it on my talk page please so I can deal with it while it's fresh in my mind. -Rod57 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

When one adds content the expectation is that one will add a reference to a high quality source as well per WP:V and WP:MEDRS. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Better IMO to ask for a source than revert the addition. - Rod57 (talk) 18:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
We also do not typically list all meds currently in trails such as "TAS-102, a drug in phase III clinical trial" Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
But a phase III trial is notable for conditions where the standard of care to get on a drug trial. - Rod57 (talk) 18:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

2013

[edit]

Soviet work?

[edit]

Please could you explain your words "Soviet work" after the "see also: virotherapy" link here? The linked article does not currently mention Soviet or Russian, nor did this version at the time. – Fayenatic London 16:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

The virotherapy article seems almost exclusively about RIGVIR. I said 'soviet' because the work (on RIGVIR) was carried out in Latvia whilst it was part of the soviet union. Would you prefer we changed it to 'Latvian work' or perhaps 'Mainly RIGVIR (Latvian)' ? - Rod57 (talk) 04:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I didn't look closely enough. Soviet is fine. I changed it to "(mainly RIGVIR, Soviet work)". Thanks – Fayenatic London 21:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

cn tag format

[edit]

Hi, Rod57. I noticed this edit to the Photonics article. Just a tip: you want to use the {{cn}} tag like this {{cn|date=April 2013}}. That prevents the page from getting added to Category:Pages containing citation needed template with deprecated parameters and a bot from re-adding a new date parameter in a day or so. Cheers, Jason Quinn (talk) 18:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for spotting I forgot the format, and fixing it. - Rod57 (talk) 18:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

[edit]
Cochrane Collaboration

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the invitation. I've applied. - Rod57 (talk) 13:52, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Page moved.

[edit]

Howdy. Have moved User;Rod57/sandbox/Cochrane-access to User:Rod57/sandbox/Cochrane-access for you. Good luck with your app. - TB (talk) 12:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oops, and Thanks. - Rod57 (talk) 07:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your free Cochrane account is on its way!

[edit]

Please fill out this very short form to receive your free access to Cochrane Collaboration's library of medical reviews: Link to form.

If you have any questions, just ask me. Cheers, Ocaasi 13:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done.


2014

[edit]

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)

[edit]

Hello Wikimedians!

Image
The TWL OWL says sign up today :)

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

  • DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
  • Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
  • Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
  • British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
  • Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
  • Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
  • JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Mass Message to the Book & Bytes recipient list.

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (December 2014)

[edit]

Hello Wikimedians!

Image
The TWL OWL says sign up today :)

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team.00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Mass Message tool to the Book & Bytes recipient list.


Books and Bytes - Issue 9

Read the full newsletter Image Done

2015

[edit]
Books and Bytes - Issue 10

Read the full newsletter Image Done

My change to CMOS reverted

[edit]

[This reversion] I suspect was based purely on my edit summary since the reversion comment relates only to what's in the edit summary. Reverter made no mention of my other changes he reverted.

A new reference tool

[edit]

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, FDA Accelerated Approval Program

[edit]
Image

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, FDA Accelerated Approval Program. ... Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – FDA Accelerated Approval. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. ... ... Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Image Thanks for making FDA Accelerated Approval Program. I proposed it for deletion and merged the see also section to FDA Accelerated Approval. The issue is more in the news lately - I hope the concept can be developed here.

If I proposed deletion in error then message me and I will help put things back. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

[edit]
Image

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

...when you edited Epratuzumab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Effector cell

Image Done Changed link to T helper cell - BTW Effector cell needs work. - Rod57 (talk) 02:50, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reversion by ajs as unreferenced

[edit]

See User_talk:Andyjsmith#Your_reversion_of_my_edit_seems_heavyhanded Sept 2015. ajs seemed to agree.

References

[edit]
Image

Remember that when adding medical content please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

This was after DJ reverted my correcting an out of date statement in multiple sclerosis rather than asking for a source. - Rod57 (talk) 13:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Requested move of merged BMS-945429 → Clazakizumab Dec 20

[edit]

2016

[edit]

Efficient energy use

[edit]

Hey Rod, I saw you're a member of WP:Energy and that you had posted on the talk page for efficient energy use. I proposed a few edits to the article as whole over there; could you take a look at them if you've got a moment? As to your point about reverting the title of the article to "energy efficiency", I agree that it's a better title, but I'm not sure if it can be implemented as long as the disambiguation page holds the actual title.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 02:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

@FacultiesIntact: Hi, I only had a quick look but your change from Vehicles to Transportation looks helpful. I notice the current article now has a section on Australia (which I suggested be split out). I think the article should be split into Energy efficiency programmes/initiatives (which can summarise what various nations and organisations are proposing and doing) and Energy efficiency principles - but it would be too much work for me. I'll mention it on the talk page. - Rod57 (talk) 14:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes - Issue 15 - has open access button

[edit]

...

Books & Bytes Issue 15, December-January 2016
...

Read the full newsletter Green tick : Has open access button at bottom

...

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

[edit]
Image The Cure Award
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Peregrine/Bavituximab

[edit]

Please do open a discussion on the Peregrine Talk page. I will be interested to hear your arguments. Jytdog (talk) 20:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Started at Talk:Peregrine_Pharmaceuticals#Proposal to split out (demerge) Bavituximab - Rod57 (talk) 21:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Happy to talk about your perceptions of my editing here or at my talk page... that just doesn't belong on an article Talk page.Jytdog (talk) 21:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes - Issues 16 - 19

[edit]

Issue 16, February-March 2016

  • A new cite archive template, ...
  • Metrics for the Wikipedia Library's last three months

Read the full newsletter Green tick : has open access button at bottom


Issue 17, April-May 2016

Read the full newsletter

Green tickY : The Wikipedia Library



The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes Issue 18, June–July 2016

  • New donations (research access) - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, and more!
  • Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata (inc wikidata for medicine suggestion)
  • ...
  • Read the full newsletter - Done check -


The Wikipedia Library - Books & Bytes Issue 19, September–October 2016

  • New and expanded donations/access - ...
  • New Library Card Platform ... Sign up for Library Card.
  • Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links -
  • Read the full newsletter - Done check

2017

[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 21

[edit]

The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes Issue 21, January-March 2017

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

[edit]
please help translate this message into your local language via meta
Image The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

CAR-T

[edit]

I'm not sure where this should redirect to. The current target doesn't have a lot of information but links to chimeric antigen receptor. Even there, CAR-T doesn't get described well.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:59, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

I agree Adoptive cell transfer#Genetic engineering is not that helpful so I've changed the redirect to Chimeric antigen receptor which does cover CAR-T in a few places (see Contents) (but not yet in the intro). - Rod57 (talk) 20:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Good. I didn't know whether I should do it myself. This doesn't qualify as a medical source on Wikipedia, though there are usually links to acceptable sources. And I see you previously did this for CART.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
(talk page stalker) I have struggled with this too. Way too much of the discussion about CAR-T ignores that it is a cell therapy, with all the baggage that comes with that. The CAR article should really just have the details of the receptor component, in my view. Jytdog (talk) 21:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Talk:Chimeric_antigen_receptor#Propose_rename_to_CAR-T_or_Chimeric_antigen_receptor_T_cell - Rod57 (talk) 09:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Books and Bytes - Issue 22

[edit]
Issue 22, April-May 2017

Read the full newsletter

High quality secondary sources

[edit]

Please use these. This is not an appropriate source for medical content. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Immunotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors

[edit]

Hi, @Rod57: (and CC: @Doc James:) I've modified the redirects from "Checkpoint inhibitor --> Cancer_immunotherapy#Immune_checkpoint_blockade" and "Checkpoint inhibition --> Cancer immunotherapy#Immune checkpoint blockade" to link instead to the Immune checkpoint page. I was confused in part since Cancer immunotherapy#Immune checkpoints also links to the same section.

Also noticed there's some overlap in content on the Immunotherapy page. Maybe this content can be consolidated into one page instead of spread across three different pages? Mainly I want to find a better location to post research from big Pharama companies researching Checkpoint Inhibitors and some of the more notable studies/failures/new drugs on this. (Note) One new source I'd like to add/integrate with this:

Shaded0 (talk) 15:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, @Shaded0: I think the redirects should be changed back (since immune checkpoints is too general).
I've long felt we need a separate article on [immune] checkpoint inhibition/blockade and hope to create one soon (unless someone else does). Talk:Cancer_immunotherapy#Proposed_split_out_of_the_Immune_checkpoint_blockade_section - Rod57 (talk) 10:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Rod57: I went ahead and did so, see Checkpoint_inhibitor_therapy. Right now this is just a straight out copy/paste from immune checkpoints, but will review here over the next day or two for additional content / edits with the under construction tag there. Feel free to edit away! Shaded0 (talk) 18:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Shaded0: Looks good, but the polysaccaride and neoantigen sections do not seem to belong in this article. - Rod57 (talk) 10:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Rod57: Ok - I will go ahead and remove these two. Shaded0 (talk) 03:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Books and Bytes - Issue 23

[edit]
Issue 23, June-July 2017
*Library card
*Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Books and Bytes - Issue 24

[edit]


Issue 24, August-September 2017

Read the full newsletter

WP:MEDMOS

[edit]

Per our MOS we generally use person not patient. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Doc James: I had made this edit because on first reading 'person' could have referred to 'healthy donor'. The FDA reference describes the patients cells being engineered (which clears up the ambiguity). Note to self to review MEDMOS on this. - Rod57 (talk) 11:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hum good point. Have adjusted the wording further. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

2018

[edit]

Books and Bytes - Issue 26

[edit]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

[edit]
please help translate this message into your local language via meta
Image The 2017 Cure Award
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

R-SMAD

[edit]

I was browsing articles tagged as too technical and R-SMAD came up. I saw you edited the article a couple of years ago, and was wondering if you think the article, along with I-SMAD, should be merged into SMAD (protein), as there don't seem to be enough sources to support separate articles on both. Thanks, and please tag me when you reply! Enterprisey (talk!) 07:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Enterprisey - I-SMAD could easily be merged (and might as well be), and possibly R-SMAD with a bit more care - but best to also suggest it on the relevant pages with {{Merge to|SMAD (protein)}} and let people respond on the talk pages. - Rod57 (talk) 10:04, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

EDL redirected, questioned, still to be fixed

[edit]

Greetings Rod57! I wanted to notify you that I have redirected your stub Entry, descent and landing to the pre-existing article Atmospheric entry, which already covers the topic in great detail. There may be value in writing a section there as an overview of the various challenges for EDL at Earth and Mars, based partly on your prose. Let me know what you think. — JFG talk 20:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

@JFG: Hi JFG - Thanks for letting me know - but I feel your redirect is unhelpful - Entry is just one phase of EDL and the Atmospheric entry article correctly only covers the entry phase. The issues in Descent and Landing are very different and should not go in the large Entry article. The EDL stub/article (correctly IMO) linked to Atmospheric entry, and the Descent and Landing sections could be expanded and linked to current or future specific articles. (EDL is discussed as a thing - see many NASA docs - eg as each phase has to cope with the results of the previous one). Please consider undoing your redirect. - Rod57 (talk) 10:13, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes, Issue 30

[edit]

Bytes in brief ==


Inquiry from a Public Relations Representative for Biogen on Assessing Wikipedia Article

[edit]

Hello Rod57,

My name is Matt Nemet and I am a Public Relations professional at GCI Health, an agency specializing in healthcare. We’re reaching out on behalf of our clients at Biogen to potentially update outdated information found on the Wikipedia page for its multiple sclerosis treatment candidate, opicinumab.

We’re reaching out to you because we know Wikipedia users depend on active, qualified editors for accurate and supported articles. We felt that given your previous efforts editing Wikipedia pages like pembrolizumab you might be interested in reviewing this page through the lens of updating older information.

To further disclose our position, we are aware that per Wikipedia’s guidelines neither the company nor the company’s representatives can make direct edits to Wikipedia pages. Respecting these rules, our priority is ensuring that the Wiki has the most up-to-date information – we’re reaching out in the hopes you may be able to assess the current state of the page against publicly available information on Biogen and opicinumab to make accurate and appropriate updates.

Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions.

Best regards, MSN2017 (talk) 14:41, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Matt, If you know of any third party publications, peer reviewed publications, or independent/disinterested discussion of opicinumab (ideally not based on biogen press releases) you could mention them on talk:opicinumab (for everyone to consider) and, if you wish, ping me or mention my name (like I have here: MSN2017) to notify me as well. or you can email me ("email-this-user" under Tools on the LHS of my talk or user pages). - Rod57 (talk) 19:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello Rod57, Thanks for your response! We’re planning to share references for consideration via the Opicinumab talk page and will be sure to tag you for visibility. Best, MSN2017 (talk) 21:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes, Issue 31

[edit]
Image Done

2019

[edit]

Chinese Deep Space Network

[edit]

The article now has a map with all the important radiotelescopes and the positions. However it stolen from the German Wikipedia, so you might change the name of the templates (I could not find the English equivalent), but it also works to my surprise. As it contains more than just the deep space network, you might reuse it also somewhere else, you just need to eliminate the unnecessary parts.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 23:45, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

BTW the article is massively outdated and represents the situation (at least) six years ago. Within the next five years (after Qitai is finished) China will be the number 1 player in radioastronomy by a mile and even now it has a deep space network with several huge dishes, that is more capable than Esas ESTRACK network, especially with the big dishes in Tian Ma and Jiamusi. Prepare for a manned moon mission, a manned moon orbiting space station and a manned mars mission (or at least a serious attempt) after that.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 00:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Giftzwerg 88 - I don't plan to update Chinese Deep Space Network again
(Today it says "Planned improvements by 2012 : A new 35-meter antenna at the Kashgar station. & A 64-meter antenna in Jiamusi. (~130°E)". Do you have sources for their completion and use ?)
- but I look forward to more exciting Chinese missions. - Rod57 (talk) 12:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
You might use the sources of the German Version (it´s all in English). I´ts hard to find any sources at all. For the unsourced parts you can confirm the real existence of the dishes in google maps at least. I got some of the positions out of several blogs, which are not valid sources for Wikipedia.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 12:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes, Issue 32

[edit]

Bytes in brief

[edit]

...


Books & Bytes, Issue 33

[edit]
Image Done

Membership renewal

[edit]
Image

You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2020.


Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019

[edit]

Image Done

Updating Follicular lymphoma

[edit]

As you suggested, the Follicular lymphoma page has been undated with sections on transformed follicular lymphoma. (talk) 13:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019

[edit]


  • ~
  • We're building something great, but.. (need translators and coders )
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • A Wikibrarian's story ~~
  • Bytes in brief ~

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Image Done

2020

[edit]

Issue 38, January – April 2020

[edit]
  • New partnership
  • Global roundup
    • On Wikipedia, a fight is raging over coronavirus disinformation

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Image Done

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020

[edit]
  • Library Card Platform <<<< SIGN UP
  • New partnerships
    • ProQuest
    • Springer Nature
    • BioOne
    • CEEOL
    • IWA Publishing
    • ICE Publishing
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image
Hello, Rod57. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Wanted to let you know that I responded to your comment on the Tislelizumab Talk page. Mattsnod (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Rocketry Invitation

[edit]
Image
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's rocketry-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Rocketry? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's rocketry-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. Please see our list of open tasks for ideas on where to get started.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

[edit]


  • New partnerships
    • ~
    • Ancestry
    • RILM
  • ~ ~

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image Done

Response to discussion on Tislelizumab Talk Page

[edit]
Image
Hello, Rod57. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hi. Wanted to see if you got a chance to review my response to your comment on the Tislelizumab Talk page. Mattsnod (talk) 19:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Spaceflight newsletter notification

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
WikiProject Notification
This is a one-time notification to all active WikiProject Spaceflight members.
The Downlink project page
I am notifying you, that thep The Downlink newsletter is starting up again, the first new issue will be published on the 1 November 2020.

Thanks, Terasail [Talk]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 October 2020 — 31 October 2020

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image Done
[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 November 2020 — 30 November 2020

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image Done

Thank you for your work in Project Spaceflight

[edit]
Image The SPFLT Achievement Patch
For your work in Project Spaceflight. Neopeius (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply


I look forward to collaborating with you on more satellite articles! :)

2021

[edit]
[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 December 2020 — 31 December 2020

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image Done

Membership renewal of Wiki Project Med Foundation

[edit]

Membership renewal

[edit]
Image

You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2022.


Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk), 2021.01

Books & Bytes - Issue 42

[edit]


  • ~ ~
  • Library Card input requested
  • Libraries love Wikimedia, too!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image Done
[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 January 2021 — 31 January 2021

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image Done

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 February 2021 — 28 February 2021

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image Done

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 March 2021 — 31 March 2021

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Image DoneReply

WikiProject Rocketry

[edit]

WikiProject Rocketry ended earlier this month. I revived it on 17 April 2021. You are welcome to help with it. It is currently considered semi-active. If edits continue often, please replace it with active. You are also invited to edit Draft: Wikipedia:WikiProject SpaceX (company) and add your username to the members list. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 April 2021 — 30 April 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 7
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
Article of the month.
Image

Michael Collins was an American astronaut who flew the Apollo 11 command module Columbia around the Moon in 1969 while his crewmates, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, made the first crewed landing on the surface. He was selected as part of NASA's third group of 14 astronauts in 1963 and flew in space twice.

Image of the month.
Image

The unofficial flag of earth day which is made of the "Blue Marble" image taken onboard of the Apollo 17 spacecraft with a blue background.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 112.
Total number of members: 325.


April Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.


  1. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L23 (7th at 16:34:18) Success Success
  2. China Long March 4B – Shiyan 6-02 (8th at 23:01) Success Success
  3. Russia Crewed mission Soyuz-2.1a – MS-18 (9th at 07:42:40) Success Success
  4. United States Crewed mission Falcon 9 – Crew-2 (23rd at 22:14:08) Success Success
  5. Russia Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb 6 (25th at 22:14:08) Success Success
  6. United States Delta IV Heavy – NROL-82 (26th at 20:47) Success Success
  7. China Long March 6 – Qilu 1 & Qilu 4 (27th at 03:20) Success Success
  8. European Union Vega – Pléiades Neo 3 (29th at 01:50:00) Success Success
  9. China Long March 6 – Tianhe 1 (29th at 03:23:15) Success Success
  10. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L24 (29rd at 03:44) Success Success
  11. China Long March 6 – Yaogan 34 (27th at 03:20) Success Success

May Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


  • Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L25
  • GSLV Mk.2 – GISAT 1
  • Long March 7 – Tianzhou 2
  • Atlas 5 – SBIRS GEO Flight 5
  • Soyuz – OneWeb 7
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 30 April 2021.

Monthly Changes

Since March, 39 new pages have been added to Spaceflight. There is 1 less GA-class, with 3 more files, 4 more B-class, 6 more C-class, 7 more start-class and 5 new stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Balon Greyjoy and Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image Done

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 May 2021 — 31 May 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 8
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
  • The Crew of SpaceX Crew-1 had a successful splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico on 2nd May at 06:56:33 UTC. After they launched in November 2020 and had spent 167 days in space.
  • A LongMarch 5B rocket had an uncontrolled re-entery into the atmosphere on 4th May. With any debris being reported to have landed in the Indian Ocean.
  • One of Rocket Labs Electron rockets expierienced a launch malfunction 2:30 into launch causing the mission to result in failure.
  • Images have been released after the landing of Zhurong rover on Mars on 14th May.

Featured Content


Article of the month.
Image

Creola Katherine Johnson was an American mathematician whose calculations of orbital mechanics as a NASA employee were critical to the success of the first and subsequent U.S. crewed spaceflights. The space agency noted her "historical role as one of the first African-American women to work as a NASA scientist".

Image of the month.
Image

Astronaut Clayton Anderson wis shown as a water bubble floats in the middeck of space shuttle Discovery during the STS-131 mission.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 116. Total number of members: 329.

May Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.


  1. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L25 (4th at 19:01:07) Success Success
  2. China Long March 2C – Yaogan 30-08 (6th at 18:11) Success Success
  3. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L27 (9th at 06:42) Success Success
  4. New Zealand Electron – "Running Out of Toes" (15th at 11:11) Failure Failure
  5. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L26 (15th at 22:56) Success Success
  6. United States Atlas 5 – SBIRS-GEO 5 (18th at 17:37) Success Success
  7. China Long March 4B – Haiyang 2D (19th at 04:03) Success Success
  8. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L28 (26th at 18:59) Success Success
  9. Russia Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb 7 (28th at 17:38:39) Success Success
  10. China Long March 7 – Tianzhou 2 (29th at 12:55:29) Success Success

June Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 May 2021.

Monthly Changes

Since April, 45 pages have been added to Spaceflight. 1 article reached FA-Class and 1 image reached FM-Class. There is 1 more GA class article, with 2 more B-class, 8 more C-class, 1 less start-class and 5 new stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: StarshipSLS & Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image Done

Factual changes on cladribine – Request for feedback from community before edits - replied

[edit]

Dear Wiki member, I hope you are well.

I am reaching out regarding my latest contribution to the cladribine Wikipedia page. I have declared my COI and intended changes on the Talk page prior to initiating the page edit directly. I was hoping to hear from editors to ensure a smooth edit vetted by the Wikipedia community. It has now been 3 weeks and I have not received any feedback. I can see that you are quite active on other MS molecules (your contribution on the ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab or fingolimod pages for example). I was wondering if you could please advise whether it would be acceptable for me to proceed with the edits. To provide further clarification, I have suggested further unbiased detail to the current page, and have proposed some edits, all of which I have included citations for. I invite you to consult my post here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cladribine#2021_Page_factual_update

I would greatly appreciate your feedback. I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards, Samer FahmySamerFahmy (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the details on the proposed edits. I have replied on Talk:Cladribine - Rod57 (talk) 03:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 June 2021 — 30 June 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 9
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
Featured Content!
Article of the month.
Image

Lisa Marie Nowak is an American aeronautical engineer, and former NASA astronaut and United States Navy captain. Nowak was selected by NASA for NASA Astronaut Group 16 in 1996. She flew in space aboard Space Shuttle Discovery during the STS-121 mission in July 2006. In 2007, Nowak was involved in an incident that led to her dismissal from NASA and the Navy.

This article was promoted to featured status last month!

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 30 June 2021.
Image of the month.
Image

Offical portrait of Edwin E. Aldrin Jr. (Buzz Aldrin) who was the pilot on the Apollo 11 mission.

This image was promoted to featured status last month!


Members


New Members:

Number of active members: 118. Total number of members: 331.
Monthly Changes

Since May 28 pages ahve been added to Spaceflight. 1 article reached FA-Class, 1 list reached FL-class & 2 images reached FM-Class. There is 1 more GA class article, as well as 1 more file page. There are 4 more B class articles, 20 more C class articles, 10 less start class articles & 1 less stub article.

BOOKS are no longer supported by the WikiProject and are in the process of being deleted! See WP:BOOKSDEP & here for more.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image Done No lists of launches done and planned !

Books & Bytes – Issue 45

[edit]

Image Done

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 July 2021 — 31 July 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 10
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
  • On 11th July Virgin Galactic had their first fully crewed mission to the edge of space with Richard Branson onboard in SpaceShipTwo VSS Unity.
  • On 17th July NASA announced that scientific observations from the Hubble Space Telescope had resumed on a backup computer after being placed in a "safe mode" since June 13.
  • On 20th July Blue Origin had their first fully crewed mission to the edge of space with Jeff Bezos onboard in a New Shepard capsule.
  • On 26th July The Pirs module was the first permanent ISS module to be decommissioned. After docking to the ISS on 17th September 2001, just under 20 years ago.
  • On 29th July The ISS was moved out of its normal orientation after the Nauka module (a new Russian module) was docked and started firing its thrusters.
Article of the month.
Image

Shuttle-Centaur was a version of the Centaur upper stage rocket designed to be carried aloft inside the Space Shuttle. Two variants were developed: Centaur G-Prime and Centaur G. The powerful Centaur upper stage allowed for heavier deep space probes, and for them to reach Jupiter sooner. However, neither variant ever flew on a Shuttle.

Image of the month.
Image

This is an Extreme Deep Field image taken from the Hubble Space Telescope, released by NASA on September 25th, 2012. With exposure dates from July 2002 to March 2012.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 120. Total number of members: 333.

July Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.


  1. Russia Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb 8 (1st at 12:48:33) Success Success
  2. China Long March 2D – Jilin-1 (3rd at 02:51) Success Success
  3. China Long March 4C – Fengyun 3E (4th at 23:28) Success Success
  4. China Long March 3C/E – Tianlian I-05 (6th at 15:53) Success Success
  5. China Long March 6 – Ningxia 1 (9th at 11:59) Success Success
  6. China Long March 2C – Yaogan 30-10 (19th at 00:19) Success Success
  7. Russia Proton-M – Nauka (21st at 14:58:25) Success Success
  8. China Long March 2D – Tianhui-1D (29th at 04:01) Success Success
  9. United States Electron – Monolith (29th at 06:00) Success Success
  10. European Union Ariane 5 ECA – SO-D2 & Eutelsat (30th at 21:00) Success Success

August Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 July 2021.
Spaceflight articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
Image FA7195738
Image FL1449
Image FM102102
Image GA11243454123
B2484052142
C56160545510121,283
Start361571,1062,2443743,917
Stub92442,1882332,674
List14126792181438
Category1,0321,032
Disambig4949
File207207
Portal5555
Project6868
Redirect2111,13411,139
Template501501
Other3131
Assessed1265462,0585,2783,17962111,808
Unassessed317478
Total1265462,0585,2813,18069511,886

Monthly Changes

Since June: 24 pages have been added to spaceflight. There are 4 more files. There is 1 more B class article, 5 more C class articles, 10 more start class articles & 2 more stub class articles.
The 2 additional FM class have been FM for a few years, they just registered this month.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 August 2021 — 31 August 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 11
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
  • On 12th August a GSLV Mk.2 rocket with the EOS-03 Earth observation satellite as a payload encountered a third stage failure and crashed back into the ground after reaching a maximum altitude of 140km (87 miles).
  • On 20th August a 5 hour 55 minute spacewalk was completed by chinese astronauts Nie Haisheng and Liu Boming on the Tiangong space station.
  • On 28th August an Astra rocket had an engine failure at launch, but managed to recover and fly to the upper atmosphere before leaving its flight corridor, resulting in flight temination.
Article of the month.
Image

Apollo 7 was the first crewed flight in NASA's Apollo program, and saw the resumption of human spaceflight by the agency after the fire that killed the three Apollo 1 astronauts. The Apollo 7 crew was commanded by Walter M. Schirra, with command module pilot Donn F. Eisele and lunar module pilot R. Walter Cunningham.

Image of the month.
Image

Official portrait of Ilan Ramon, an astronaut killed during the failed re-entry of the Space Shuttle Columbia.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 122. Total number of members: 335.

August Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.


  1. China Hyperbola-1 – Jilin-1 (3rd at 07:39) Failure Failure
  2. China Long March 6 – KL-Beta A/B (4th at 11:01) Success Success
  3. China Long March 3B/E – ChinaSat 2E (5th at 16:30:05) Success Success
  4. United States Antares 230+ – Cygnus NG-16 (10th at 22:01:05) Success Success
  5. India GSLV Mk II – EOS-03 (GISAT-1) (12th at 00:13) Failure Failure
  6. Europe France Vega – Pléiades-Neo 4 (17th at 01:47:06) Success Success
  7. China Long March 4B – Tianhui-2 02 (18th at 22:32) Success Success
  8. Russia Kazakhstan Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb 9 (21st at 22:13:40) Success Success
  9. China Long March 2C – RSW-01 (24th at 11:15) Success Success
  10. China Long March 3B/E – TJSW-7 (24th at 15:41) Success Success
  11. United States Rocket 3 – STP-27AD1 (28th at 22:35) Failure Failure
  12. United States Falcon 9 – CRS-23 (29th at 07:14:49) Success Success

September Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 August 2021.
Spaceflight articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
Image FA7195738
Image FL1449
Image FM102102
Image GA10243454122
B4484153146
C571605465301,293
Start341571,1062,2623743,933
Stub92442,19712342,685
List14124792251443
Category1,0331,033
Disambig14950
File206206
Portal5555
Project5858
Redirect21,1401,142
Template504504
Other2222
Assessed1265442,0595,3333,17060911,841
Unassessed5353
Total1265442,0595,3333,17066211,894

Monthly Changes

Since July: 8 pages have been added to spaceflight. There is 1 less file. There is 1 less GA class article and are 4 less B-class, 10 more C-class, 17 more start-class and 11 new stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 46

[edit]

included : New Library Card collections The Wikipedia Library is announcing several new collections:


Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on Library Card.

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 September 2021 — 31 October 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 12
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
Featured Content!
Members

New Members: No new members.

Number of active members: 127. Total number of members: 340.

October Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.


  1. Russia Kazakhstan Crewed mission Soyuz-2.1a – Soyuz MS-19 (5th at 08:55:02) Success Success
  2. Russia Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb (14th at 09:40:10) Success Success
  3. China Long March 2D – Solar Explorer (14th at 10:51) Success Success
  4. China Long March 2F – Shenzhou 13 (15th at 16:23:56) Success Success
  5. United States Atlas V – Lucy (16th at 09:34:00) Success Success
  6. South Korea Nuri – Dummy payload (21st at 08:00) Failure Failure
  7. China Long March 3B/E – Shijian-21 (24th at 01:27:03) Success Success
  8. Europe France Ariane 5 – SES-17 (24th at 02:10) Success Success
  9. Japan H-IIA – QZS-1R (26th at 02:19:37) Success Success
  10. China Kuaizhou – Jilin-1 Gaofen-02F (27th at 06:19) Success Success
  11. Russia Kazakhstan Soyuz-2.1a – MS-18 (28th at 00:00:32) Success Success

November Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 October 2021.
Spaceflight articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
Image FA7216741
Image FL24410
Image FM103103
Image GA11273654128
B4474056147
C581595605871,364
Start331601,1082,3313343,966
Stub112432,1862172,657
List15126852301457
Category11,0421,043
Disambig5151
File212212
Portal5555
Project5959
Redirect11,1471,148
Template505505
Other2323
Assessed1285532,0825,4573,19755211,969
Total1285532,0825,4573,19755211,969

Monthly Changes

Since August: 75 pages have been added to spaceflight. There are 3 more FA class articles, 1 more FL class page and 1 more FM class file. There are 6 less files. There are 6 more GA class articles and 1 more B-class article, 71 more C-class, 33 more start-class and 28 less stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image Done Rod57 (talk) 20:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Cu04" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Image A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cu04. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 5#Cu04 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Seems I created it - (and it has Zero not Oh) I proposed delete. - Rod57 (talk) 09:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 47

[edit]

Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021

  • On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
  • Search tool deployed
  • New My Library design improvements

Read the full newsletter check


Includes : New Library Card platform design[edit]

The Wikipedia Library is continuing with its design improvements. With the latest update, you can now mark collections you are authorized to access as favorites - they'll then show up in the Favorites tab, which will become the default tab for you once you've got at least one collection favorited. We hope this will make it easier to get right to the collections you're most interested in without needing to search through a bunch of other options. We've also added a filter based on whether a particular collection is indexed in the search tool (see above). We'd love to hear what you think of the new UI - whether that's positive experiences, bugs and technical issues, or things you’d like to see changed, please share your thoughts here!

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

[edit]

Books & Bytes Issue 48, November – December 2021

  • Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter check

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

[edit]

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

  • New library collections
  • Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter check

Includes : New partners[edit]

The Wikipedia Library is announcing free, full-access, accounts for several new partners: Wiley – broad collections of online journals, books, and research resources, covering life, health, social, and physical sciences OECD iLibrary, OECD Data, and OECD Multimedia Gallery – a repository of materials published by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). A number of existing partners have also moved to allow immediate access to all eligible editors, without requiring an application; these include Alexander Street, American Psychiatric Association, and American Psychological Association. To see which partners are available to you, visit your My Collections page. (link lost?)

Visit via the newsletter ? I have accepted the library terms of use.

NERVA

[edit]

Could I trouble you to take a look at the NERVA article, which is up for review at FAC at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/NERVA/archive2? This would be greatly appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Accurin for deletion

[edit]
Image
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Accurin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accurin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 18:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I had created stub about 7 years ago - Decision was to delete (~ not notable ~ not approved ~ nanomedicine) - Rod57 (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of BIND-014 for deletion

[edit]
Image
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BIND-014 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BIND-014 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

An accurin. afd relisted - seems to lack secondary sources for notability. - Rod57 (talk) 19:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Ytterbium dodecaboride" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Image An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ytterbium dodecaboride and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 21#Ytterbium dodecaboride until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

target empty section had been deleted. - Rod57 (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 50

[edit]

Read the full newsletter check

Books & Bytes – Issue 51

[edit]

Image The Wikipedia Library

Image

Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022

  • New library partners
    • SAGE Journals
    • Elsevier ScienceDirect
    • University of Chicago Press
    • Information Processing Society of Japan
  • Feedback requested on this newsletter
  • 1Lib1Ref May 2022

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 52

[edit]

Image The Wikipedia Library

Image

Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022

  • New instant-access collections:
    • SpringerLink and Springer Nature
    • Project MUSE
    • Taylor & Francis
    • ASHA
    • Loeb
  • Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 53

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022

  • New collections:
    • Edward Elgar
    • E-Yearbook
    • Corriere della Serra
    • Wikilala
  • Collections moved to Library Bundle:
    • Ancestry
  • New feature: Outage notification
  • Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]
Image

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited R-500, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page R500.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Does it violate rules ? How should it be done ? - Rod57 (talk) 11:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

  • New collections:
    • British Newspaper Archive
    • Findmypast
    • University of Michigan Press
    • ACLS
    • Duke University Press
  • 1Lib1Ref 2023
  • Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

  • New bundle partners:
    • Newspapers.com
    • Fold3
  • 1Lib1Ref January report
  • Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 56

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

  • New partner:
    • Perlego
  • Library access tips and tricks
  • Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of JSCI

[edit]
Image

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JSCI requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 12:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 57

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

  • Suggestion improvements
  • Favorite collections tips
  • Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

  • New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
  • Tech tip: Filters
  • Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nanostrain

[edit]
Notice

The article Nanostrain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

ephemeral

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fgnievinski (talk) 03:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Improved the page and removed the notice. Includes IBM's peizoelectronic transistor, and Relates to Beyond CMOS - a long term programme/goal. - Rod57 (talk) 10:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

  • Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
  • Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]
Image

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 60

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

  • Three new partners
  • Google Scholar integration
  • How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 61

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

  • Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
  • 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

  • IEEE and Haaretz now available
  • Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
  • Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

2195 aluminium alloy

[edit]

Hello! Back in 2020, you have added to said article that 2195 is used on Vulcan Centaur: diff. So, I'm interested, where did you get it from? It's easy to find sources about that alloy's use by SpaceX and NASA, but I haven't found anything about use by ULA. Trasheater Midtier🐉(talk) 20:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Trasheater Midir: Good question - I forget. Strange that I didn't supply the ref there (or in the Vulcan Centaur article). I'll have a look. - Rod57 (talk) 22:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Jeffrey Leiden Updates

[edit]

Hi Rod57. I hope you are well. I noticed that you have an interest in medicine and pharmacology by your participation in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Participants#Active_participants and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pharmacology/Participants. Therefore, I am hoping you might like to take a look at what I believe is a straightforward edit request I posted at Talk:Jeffrey_Leiden#Updates. Jeffrey Leiden is the executive chairman of Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Another editor has already implemented the last bullet point of four in total, and has said he is not going to implement the rest, but he does "not oppose if other editors make them." If you think the remaining edits are reasonable, would you kindly implement them? Thanks so much, JohnDatVertex (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry User:JohnDatVertex - no time to consider. - Rod57 (talk) 15:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 63

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

  • One new partner
  • 1Lib1Ref
  • Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 64

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024

  • The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
  • Wikimania presentation
  • New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Purple Earth hypothesis

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_Earth_hypothesis

Do you know where you saw your claim of archaeal membrane components being found in early Earth sediments being potential proof of this hypothesis came from? A citation is definitely needed there. Nungimelheshin (talk) 19:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 65

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

  • Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
  • Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
  • Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]
Image

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Double-T armature

[edit]
Notice

The article Double-T armature has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Literally a shape of an armature which is not mentioned in the Armature (electrical) article; tagged with notability for a decade

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MimirIsSmart (talk) 02:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 66

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 66, November – December 2024

  • Les Jours and East View Press join the library
  • Tech tip: Newspapers.com

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --17:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello! This is an announcement that The Downlink has been revived. Rather than simply start again, I have chosen to create two special issues recapping the past three years. The first special issue spans November 2021 to December 2023, while the second special issue spans January 2024 to December 2024.

Due to the size of these pages, as well as the fact that they are non-standard issues, I have instead had this notice sent out. The following issues of volume 3 (Jan - Dec 2025) should be significantly smaller.

Please be aware that, for a variety of reasons, the issues that I create may be published late.

Here are the issues:

Ships & Space(Edits) 02:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at the talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the mailing list.

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 – 31 January
Volume 3 — Issue 1
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
Introduction to Volume 3
Initially launched in late 2010/early 2011 for a run of four months, The Downlink was unpublished for more than nine years, after which a second volume was published from October 2020 to October 2021. This second volume was very different from the first volume, both in style and structure. A December issue was planned (for some reason, the second volume became volume 1 in April 2021), but was never finished. Like with volume 2, this volume 3 was intended to come with changes, though primarily to style.
Volume 3 will not feature any significant changes to style or structure. This both provides continuity with the previous volume and allows the contributors to construct each issue relatively easily. However, following volumes may see changes to style, format, and upload schedule. As it is still very early in the year, a discussion on this is not yet necessary, but suggestions of all kinds are always welcome at the talk page.
In the News
  • Blue Ghost Mission 1 and Hakuto-R Mission 2 were launched from Kennedy Space Center on 15 January. They are planned to land in March and April, respectively.
  • On 30 January, Sunita Williams broke Peggy Whitson's record for most time spent on spacewalks by a woman, at 62 hours and 6 minutes total.
  • ISRO successfully docked two SpaDeX satellites on 16 January, making India the fourth country (including the EU) to dock two vehicles in space.
  • Blue Origin's New Glenn launch vehicle completed its maiden flight on 16 January. The payload was successfully placed in orbit, while the first staged failed to land on the recovery ship.
Featured Content
Article of the Month

Soyuz programme

The Soyuz programme (/ˈsɔɪjuːz/ SOY-yooz, /ˈsɔː-/ SAW-; Russian: Союз [sɐˈjus], meaning "Union") is a human spaceflight programme initiated by the Soviet Union in the early 1960s. The Soyuz spacecraft was originally part of a Moon landing project intended to put a Soviet cosmonaut on the Moon. It was the third Soviet human spaceflight programme after the Vostok (1961–1963) and Voskhod (1964–1965) programmes.

The programme consists of the Soyuz capsule and the Soyuz rocket and is now the responsibility of Roscosmos. After the retirement of the Space Shuttle in 2011, the Soyuz was the only way for humans to get to the International Space Station (ISS) until 30 May 2020 when Crew Dragon flew to the ISS for the first time with astronauts.

Image of the Month

Gene Cernan on the Moon
Image

Gene Cernan was the eleventh and (as of 2025) last person to ever step foot on the moon. In addition to being an astronaut, he was an aviator in the US Navy and engineer. Apollo 17 was his second Apollo mission, as he served as Apollo 10's lunar module pilot. He died in Houston on 16 January, 2017. He was the first astronaut to be buried at Texas State Cemetery.

Members

New members:

Number of active members: 200. Total number of members: 426.

Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. For a complete list, see here: List_of_spaceflight_launches_in_January–June_2025#January.


  1. United States New Glenn — DarkSky-1 (16 Jan. at 07:03) (success)
  2. United States SpaceX Starship — 10 Starlink simulators (16 Jan. at 22:37) (launch failure)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 January 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since December 2024, five new high-importance, eight new mid-importance, forty new low-importance, and 1,522 new NA-importance articles have been created. Fifteen unknown-importance articles have been removed, for a total of 1,560 more articles. One article has been promoted to Good Article status. There are also three more B-class articles, eleven more C-class articles, 23 more Start-class articles, four more Stub-class articles, 4 more lists, and 34 more files.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 28 February
Volume 3 — Issue 2
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month
Image
The Family Portrait of the Solar System taken by Voyager 1

The Family Portrait, or sometimes Portrait of the Planets, is an image of the Solar System acquired by Voyager 1 on February 14, 1990, from a distance of approximately 6 billion km (40 AU; 3.7 billion mi) from Earth. It features individual frames of six planets and a partial background indicating their relative positions. The picture is a mosaic of 60 frames. The frames used to compose the image were the last photographs taken by either Voyager spacecraft (which continued to relay other telemetry afterward). The frames were also the source of the famous Pale Blue Dot image of the Earth. Astronomer Carl Sagan, who was part of the Voyager imaging team, campaigned for many years to have the pictures taken.[failed verification]

Image of the month
STS-98 following liftoff
Image

Launched on 7 February 2001, STS-98 delivered to the Destiny laboratory module of the International Space Station. Flown by Atlantis, it was the first human spaceflight mission of the 21st century. The shuttle landed at Edwards Air Force Base on 20 February after being docked with the ISS for almost seven days. The crew consisted of Kenneth Cockrell, commander, Mark L. Polansky, pilot, Robert Curbeam, mission specialist 1, Marsha Ivins, mission specialist 2 and flight engineer, and Thomas David Jones, mission specialist 3.

Members

New Members: No new members.

Number of active members: 200. Total number of members: 426.

February Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.


  1. Russia Soyuz 2.1v and Volga — Kosmos-2581/-2582/-2583 (5 Feb. at 03:59) (success)
  2. China Long March 8A — 9 Hulianwang Digui (11 Feb. at 09:30) (success)
  3. United States Falcon 9 Block 5 — 23 Starlink (18 Feb. at 23:21) (success)
  4. United States Falcon 9 Block 5 — multiple (27 Feb. at 00:02) (launch success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 28 February 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since January 2025, one new high-importance, sixteen new low-importance, nineteen new NA-importance, and twelve new unknown-importance articles have been created, for a total of 58 new articles. One article has been demoted from Good Article status. There are also one more A-class article, one more B-class article, nine fewer C-class articles, thirteen more Start-class articles, three more Stub-class articles, and one more list.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space, Geni

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 67

[edit]
Image

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 67, January – February 2025

  • East View Press and The Africa Report join the library
  • Spotlight: Wikimedia+Libraries International Convention and WikiCredCon
  • Tech tip: Suggest page

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --18:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 31 March
Volume 3 — Issue 3
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • Firefly Aerospace became the first commercial company to successfully achieve a soft landing on the moon on 2 March with the landing of Blue Ghost Mission 1 near Mons Latreille. It lasted the intended length of one lunar day before losing power on 16 March. It was launched with the Hakuto-R Mission 2 lander Resilience and rover Tenacious, which are planned to land in the Mare Frigoris.
  • On 6 March, the IM-2 mission's lunar lander Athena landed on Mons Mouton. Although intact, it landed sideways, preventing it from generating enough power to operate as designed. The mission was declared over the following day.
  • SpaceX Crew-9 splashed down near Tallahassee, Florida on 18 March. Initially planned to launch with a full complement, the extension of Barry Wilmore and Sunita Williams' stay on the ISS resulted in it being launched with only two crew members.
Article of the month

The Phootprint mission was conceived as a candidate for the Mars Robotic Exploration Preparation Programme 2 (MREP-2) at ESA. In 2014, ESA funded Footprint's pre-phase A feasibility study and an 8-month industrial system study.

The mission would have lasted about 3.5 years, including the cruise time to Phobos, orbit mapping, 7 days on the surface, and finally, the sample return cruise time. The spacecraft would be powered by solar arrays.

In August 2015, the ESA-Roscosmos working group, after cooperation on ExoMars, completed a joint study for a possible future Phobos Sample Return mission, and preliminary discussions were held.

Image of the month
InSight lander testing
Image

The InSight (Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) lander was selected from among three options in August 2012. Initially planned to launch in March 2016, an instrument issue delayed the launch to May 2018, the next Earth-Mars launch window. It was successfully launched on 5 May, and landed on Elysium Planitia on 26 November 2018. Taking seismographic and thermographic readings, InSight operated for a total of 4 years and 19 days instead of its planned 2 year mission. The mission was declared over on 21 December, 2022 after contact was lost on 15 December. A re-analysis of some of its data indicates that there may be significant amounts of groundwater in Mars' crust.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 206. Total number of members: 430.

March Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.


  1. France Ariane 62 — CSO-3 (6 Mar. at 16:24 UTC) (success)
  2. United States SpaceX Starship — four Starlink simulators (6 Mar. at 23:30 UTC) (launch failure)
  3. United StatesJapan Rocket Lab Electron — QPS-SAR 9/SUSANOO-1 (15 Mar. at 00:00 UTC) (success)
  4. Germany Spectrum — no payload (30 Mar. at 10:30 UTC) (launch failure)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 28 February 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since February 2025, six new low-importance and one new unknown-importance articles have been created. One NA-importance article has been removed, for a total of six new articles. There are also five more C-class articles, three more Start-class articles, two more Stub-class articles, and one more list.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 68

[edit]
Image
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 68, March–April 2025

In this issue we highlight two resource renewals, #EveryBookItsReader, a note about Phabricator, and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 30 April
Volume 3 — Issue 4
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • On 1 April, Fram2 became the first crewed mission to enter into a retrograde orbit around Earth's poles.
Article of the month

The Apollo Abort Guidance System (AGS, also known as Abort Guidance Section) was a backup computer system providing an abort capability in the event of failure of the Lunar Module's primary guidance system (Apollo PGNCS) during descent, ascent or rendezvous. As an abort system, it did not support guidance for a lunar landing.

The AGS was designed by TRW independently of the development of the Apollo Guidance Computer and PGNCS.

It was the first navigation system to use a strapdown Inertial Measurement Unit rather than a gimbaled gyrostabilized IMU (as used by PGNCS). Although not as accurate as the gimbaled IMU, it provided satisfactory accuracy with the help of the optical telescope and rendezvous radar. It was also lighter and smaller in size.

Image of the month
Falcon 9 Full Thrust
Image

Starting development in 2014, the Falcon 9 Full Thrust is a variant of the Falcon 9 that is the first orbital rocket to have a first stage successfully land vertically after launch. The stage shown here is from the April 2016 SpaceX CRS-8 mission, after landing on the autonomous spaceport drone ship Of Course I Still Love You.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 208. Total number of members: 433.

April Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.


  1. United States Falcon 9 Block 5 — Fram2 (1 Apr. at 00:46 UTC) (success)
  2. China Long March 2F/G — Shenzhou 20 (24 Apr. at 09:17 UTC) (success)
  3. United States Atlas V 551 — 27 KuiperSats (28 Apr. at 23:01) (success)
  4. United States Firefly Alpha — LM-400 Demo (29 Apr. at 13:37) (launch failure)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 30 April 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since March 2025, four new high-importance, two new mid-importance, twenty new low-importance, and two new NA-importance articles have been created. Four unknown-importance articles have been removed, for a total of 24 new articles. One article has been promoted to Featured Article status. There are also five more B-class articles, eighteen more C-class articles, eleven more Start-class articles, six fewer Stub-class articles, and six more lists.

Special thanks to Neopeius for significantly working on some of the Timeline of spaceflight articles (specifically 1953, 54, 55, and most recently 56). Thanks also to Sotakarhu for table work in the latter.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:26, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 31 May
Volume 3 — Issue 5
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month

2001 Mars Odyssey is a robotic spacecraft orbiting the planet Mars. The project was developed by NASA, and contracted out to Lockheed Martin, with an expected cost for the entire mission of US$297 million. Its mission is to use spectrometers and a thermal imager to detect evidence of past or present water and ice, as well as study the planet's geology and radiation environment. The data Odyssey obtains is intended to help answer the question of whether life once existed on Mars and create a risk-assessment of the radiation that future astronauts on Mars might experience. It also acts as a relay for communications between the Curiosity rover, and previously the Mars Exploration Rovers and Phoenix lander, to Earth. The mission was named as a tribute to Arthur C. Clarke, evoking the name of his and Stanley Kubrick's 1968 film 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Odyssey was launched April 7, 2001, on a Delta II rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, and reached Mars orbit on October 24, 2001, at 02:30 UTC (October 23, 19:30 PDT, 22:30 EDT). It was estimated to have enough propellant to function until the end of 2025, and as of April 2026, it is still collecting data. It currently holds the record for the longest-surviving continually active spacecraft in orbit around a planet other than Earth, ahead of the Pioneer Venus Orbiter (served 14 years) and the Mars Express (serving over 20 years), at 24 years, 11 months and 27 days. As of October 2019 it is in a polar orbit around Mars with a semi-major axis of about 3,800 km or 2,400 miles.

Image of the month
International Space Station after LF1
Image

Starting with Zarya in November 1998, the assembly of the International Space Station continued on a regular basis until the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, which resulted in a nearly three-year pause from November 2002 to July 2005. This image shows the ISS following the installation of the second External stowage platform. ESP-2 was launched on 26 July 2005 on board Discovery as part of STS-114.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 209. Total number of members: 434.

May Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.


  1. United States Starship — 8 Starlink Simulators (27 May at 23:36:28 UTC) (partial failure)
  2. China Long March 4B — Tianwen-2 (28 May at 04:00 UTC) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 30 May 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since April 2025, three new mid-importance, nine new low-importance, and three new unknown-importance articles have been created, for a total of 15 new articles. There is also one less B-class article, 14 more C-class articles, six more Start-class articles, four less Stub-class articles, and three more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

The World Destubathon

[edit]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize and $300 top prize for most Science and Tech destubs and improvements. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 69

[edit]
Image
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 69, May–June 2025

In this issue we highlight a new partnership, Citation Watchlist and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 30 June
Volume 3 — Issue 6
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month

Gaganyaan-1 (from Sanskrit: gagana, "celestial" and yāna, "craft, vehicle") is the first planned uncrewed test flight of the Gaganyaan programme. ISRO has officially scheduled the mission for Q4 2026.

The spacecraft will carry Vyommitra, a half-humanoid robot, to simulate astronaut conditions and provide critical data on life-support and environmental systems. The mission will demonstrate the performance of the crew module and service module in low Earth orbit, serving as a precursor to future human spaceflight under the Indian Human Spaceflight Programme.

The launch was originally scheduled for December 2020, then in December 2021, but it was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The flight plan was finally ready by April 2022 and the launch was expected to take place in early 2025, after TV-D1, TV-D2, TV-D3 and TV-D4. It was proposed in April 2022 that the crew module should be depressurized, something kept in the final planning.

The Gaganyaan spacecraft will be launched, with the humanoid robot Vyommitra, by a Human-rated LVM 3 from Satish Dhawan Space Centre and inserted into a 170 x 408 km orbit. The circularisation maneuver will be performed at the third orbit. The landing should follow the same pattern as the TV-D1. The mission will also validate the life-support system, crew escape mechanism, and re-entry technologies.

Image of the month
Hybrid-Propellant Rocket Fuel
Image

Rocket engines typically use one of two types of propellant: Solid or liquid. Hybrid-propellant rockets use a combination of these two forms of fuel, and lack some of the disadvantages of both. Their specific impulse is usually between solid-propellant and liquid-propellant rockets. The image shown here is of a 3D-printed grain, designed for a small hybrid rocket engine which would be used to demonstrate rocket combustion. On the left are two helical fuel ports, on the right a de Laval nozzle.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 210. Total number of members: 436.

June Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.


  1. United States Falcon 9 Block 5 — 26 Starlink (13 Jun. at 01:30) (success)
  2. Russia Angara A5 — 2 Kosmos (19 Jun. at 03:00) (success)
  3. United States Falcon 9 Block 5 — Axiom Mission 4 (25 Jun. at 06:31) (success)
  4. Japan H-IIA — GOSAT-GW (28 Jun. at 16:33:03) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 30 June 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since May 2025, one new high-importance, two new mid-importance, ten new low-importance, four new NA-importance, and twelve new unknown-importance articles have been created, for a total of 29 new articles. There is also one fewer A-class article, one more GA-class article, six more B-class articles, 13 more C-class articles, ten more Start-class articles, seven fewer Stub-class articles, and five more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 31 July
Volume 3 — Issue 7
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • The first launch attempt of an Australian-made rocket, Gilmour Space Technologies' Eris-1, was made on 29/30 July. The launch vehicle crashed 14 seconds after launch due to insufficient thrust.
  • The NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar satellite launched on 30 July. The first radar imaging that uses dual frequencies, it is a joint project between NASA and ISRO, and believed to cost ~US$1.5 billion, making it one of the most expensive Earth-imaging satellites.
Featured Content
Article of the month
Image
Artist's conception of AREE on the surface of Venus, showing the wind turbine inside the rover's frame.

Automaton Rover for Extreme Environments (AREE) is a NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts project to design a rover that can operate in the environment of Venus, controlled by a wind-powered mechanical computer. Venus's atmosphere is about 90 times denser than Earth's and the surface temperature is at least 462 °C (864 °F), conditions which would prevent a standard electronic computer from operating for any significant period of time. While AREE is being designed for operation on Venus, the rover's design could be re-purposed for use on Mercury, which has a comparably high surface temperature, on Jovian moons Europa or Io, where high radiation makes use of traditional electronics difficult, or on lava flows or highly radioactive areas on Earth.

The project was first proposed in 2015, and funded by the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts program with a phase-I study in 2016, and a phase-II study from 2017 to 2018.

Image of the month
Buzz Aldrin's bootprint on the Moon
Image

In July of 1969, Apollo 11 successfully fulfilled John F. Kennedy's goal of a person landing on, and returning from, the moon before the 1970s. Taking off on 16 July, the lunar lander, Eagle, touched down on the evening of the 20th (UTC). Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin exited the lander six hours later, becoming the first men on the moon. The pair stayed on the lunar surface for about 21 hours. This image is actually the second of a pair of images, taken by Aldrin so that the lunar surface's ability to bear weight could be measured.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 213. Total number of members: 439.

June Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.


  1. China Long March 4C — Shiyan 28B-01 (3 Jul. at 09:35) (success)
  2. Russia Soyuz-2.1a — Progress MS-31 (3 Jul. at 19:31) (success)
  3. United StatesIsrael Falcon 9 Block 5 — Dror-1 (PR-8000) (13 Jul. at 05:04) (success)
  4. China Hyperbola-1 — Kunpeng-03 (Enshi Xidou Shanquan/HS-9) (29 Jul. at 04:10) (success)
  5. Australia Eris Block 1 — Jar of Vegemite (29 Jul. at 21:30) (launch failure)
  6. China Long March 8A — 9 Guowang (30 Jul. at 07:49) (success)
  7. IndiaUnited States GSLV Mark II — NISAR (30 Jul. at 12:10) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 July 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since June 2025, there are seven fewer high-importance, six new mid-importance, three new low-importance, three new NA-importance, and 29 new unknown-importance articles, for a total of 34 more articles. There is also one GA-class article, three more B-class articles, three more C-class articles, 18 more Start-class articles, two fewer Stub-class articles, and one fewer lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:48, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 70

[edit]
Image
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 70, July–August 2025
  • New collections:
    • Times of Malta
    • Africa Intelligence
    • Intelligence Online
    • La Lettre
    • Glitz
  • Spotlight: Wikimania
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:15, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User:Rod57 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 31 August
Volume 3 — Issue 8
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month

NAOS (National Advanced Optical System) is a high-resolution Earth observation satellite developed by OHB Italia for the Luxembourg Directorate of Defence as part of the Luxembourg Earth Observation System (LUXEOSys). Designed for dual-use governmental and military purposes, NAOS provides very high-resolution optical imagery for applications in defense, security, and humanitarian efforts, supporting organizations such as NATO, European Union, and the United Nations. The satellite was launched on August 26, 2025, aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Space Force Base, California.

NAOS will be operated by LUXEOPs, consortium consisting of RHEA System Luxembourg, LUXSPACE, OHB and RHEA System.

Image of the month
Apollo 15 Lunar Module
Image

Launched on 26 July, 1971, Apollo 15 was the fourth Apollo mission to successfully land on the moon, and the first of the longer, more science-focused J Missions. Landing at Hadley–Apennine on the 30, Commander David Scott and Lunar Module Pilot James Irwin (Irwin on left) stayed on the moon's surface until 2 August, while Command Module Pilot Alfred Worden stayed in orbit, collecting a variety of data on the moon. Apollo 15 was the first mission to use the Lunar Roving Vehicle (on right), which allowed Scott and Irwin to travel farther from the Lunar Lander (center) than previously possible.

On 4 August, the lunar orbiter departed from orbit at the end of Apollo 15's 74th lunar orbit. On the 5, Worden performed an EVA which lasted 39 minutes. This was the first of three deep-space EVAs, all performed during J Missions. The command module landed in the North Pacific Ocean on the 7, with the command module and crew being recovered by USS Okinawa. Apollo 15 was the longest Apollo mission, lasting for a total of 12 days and 7 hours, until Apollo 17, which lasted 12 days, 13 hours, and 52 minutes.

Members

New Members: No new members

Number of active members: 213. Total number of members: 439.

August Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list here.


  1. France Ariane 62 — MetOp-SG A1 (13 Aug. at 00:37) (success)
  2. United States Vulcan Centaur VC4S — NTS-3 (13 Aug. at 00:56) (success)
  3. Russia Soyuz-2.1b — Bion-M No.2 (20 Aug. at 17:13) (success)
  4. United States SpaceX Starship — 8 Starlink simulators (26 Aug. at 23:30) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 August 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since July 2025, there is one new top-importance, one fewer high-importance, two new mid-importance, 13 new low-importance, 47 new NA-importance, and seven new unknown-importance articles, for a total of 69 more articles. There is also one more GA-class article, two more B-class articles, 18 more C-class articles, 12 more Start-class articles, and 16 fewer Stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: User:Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 30 September
Volume 3 — Issue 9
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month

Project POSTAR was the first space experiment created entirely by members of the Boy Scouts of America. On September 12, 1992, Space Shuttle Endeavour mission STS-47 carried 10 Get Away Special (GAS) canisters. Amongst these GAS cansisters was G-102 sponsored by the Boy Scouts of America's Exploring Division in cooperation with the TRW Systems Integration Group, Fairfax, Virginia. The project was named Project POSTAR. (The name was a combination of the words "Post" and "Star").

Image of the month
Space Shuttle Enterprise
Image

The Space Shuttle Enterprise (OV-101) was the first orbiter built in the Space Shuttle program. Designed for atmospheric test flights, it lacked both engines and a heat shield, making it unable to go to space. Rolled out on 17 September 1976, it was initially named Constitution, but was renamed following a large letter-writing campaign from Trekkies. Unlike its eponym, the USS Enterprise from the original Star Trek series, OV-101 never achieved spaceflight; originally intended to be refitted to become the second space-rated orbiter after Columbia, changes to the design of the Space Shuttle made it both simpler and cheaper to instead construct a new shuttle, Challenger, around a test article. It was later considered for refitting following the Challenger disaster, but it was instead decided to build a replacement, Endeavour, out of spare parts from the construction of Discovery and Atlantis.

Enterprise flew a total of five times, from 12 August to 26 October, 1977. It was then flown to Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama, where it was placed into the Saturn V dynamic test stand for the Mated Vertical Ground Vibration Testing, in order to test the Space Shuttle's launch stack. It was then used for a variety of fit checks at Kennedy Space Center and Vandenberg Air Force Base, between which it toured Europe and North America, including a showing at the 1984 Louisiana World Exposition. It was then moved to the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum on 18 November 1985. It was then moved to its present location aboard the USS Intrepid museum ship on 12 December 2011.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 214. Total number of members: 440.

September Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list here.


  1. United States Falcon 9 Block 5 — 28 Starlink (5 Sept. at 13:56) (success)
  2. United States Falcon 9 Block 5 — 24 Starlink (6 Sept. at 18:06) (success)
  3. United StatesIndonesia Falcon 9 Block 5 — Nusantara Lima (12 Sept. at 00:56) (success)
  4. China Long March 2D — Shiyan 30A/B (29 Sept. at 03:00) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 30 September 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since August 2025, there are seven fewer high-importance, seven more mid-importance, 28 more low-importance, three more NA-importance, and twelve more unknown-importance articles, for a total of 43 more articles. There is also one more GA-class article, 11 fewer B-class articles, 28 fewer C-class articles, 65 more Start-class articles, 42 fewer Stub-class articles, and two more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]
Image

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 71

[edit]
Image
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 71, September–October 2025
  • Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref 2025 in Nigeria
  • Frankfurt Book Fair
  • Tech tip: Wikipedia Library access template
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 15:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User:Rod57 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Proposed deletion of Lymphocyte expansion molecule

[edit]
Notice

The article Lymphocyte expansion molecule has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Paper that originally described LEM has been retracted and there have been no subsequent publications that support its existence.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Boghog (talk) 11:43, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Molybdenum cofactor

[edit]
Notice

The article Molybdenum cofactor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for 16 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Attempts to source it, to ask for citations needed, and to merge have all failed over the years. This is in fact a disambiguation page with two entries.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 03:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]


Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 October — 30 November
Volume 3 — Issue 10
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • On 13 November, the ESCAPADE spacecraft SIMPLEx-4A (Blue) and SIMPLEx-4B (Gold) were launched on board a New Glenn rocket. They will orbit Earth at its L2 point until the Mars transfer window opens in late 2026.
  • On the second flight of New Glenn, the first stage, "Never Tell Me the Odds," landed on the drone ship Jacklyn on 13 November. This made New Glenn the first orbital-class booster capable of landing propulsively not manufactured by SpaceX.
  • As a result of damage caused by space debris, China's Shenzhou 20 was rendered unusable for returning its crew back to Earth. The crew instead returned on board the Shenzhou 21 craft on 14 November, with Shenzhou 22 being launched uncrewed on 25 November to serve as a return vessel for the crew of Shenzhou 21.
  • On 27 November, Baikonur Cosmodrome Site 31, the only launch site used by Russia to reach the ISS, was significantly damaged during the launch of Soyuz MS-28.
Featured Content
Article of the month

Zond 6 was a formal member of the Soviet Zond program, and an unpiloted version of the Soyuz 7K-L1 crewed Moon-flyby spacecraft. It was launched on a lunar flyby mission on November 10, 1968, from a parent satellite (68-101B) in Earth parking orbit. The spacecraft carried a biological payload of turtles, flies, and bacteria. It also carried scientific probes including cosmic ray, micrometeoroid detectors, and photographic equipment.

The mission was a precursor to a crewed circumlunar flight which the Soviets hoped could occur in December 1968, thus beating the American Apollo 8. However, after rounding the Moon on November 14, Zond 6 crashed on its return to Earth, due to a parachute failure when the parachute was detached from the capsule too early.

Image of the month
Explosion on the Cygnus CRS Orb-3
Image

On 28 October, 2014, Cygnus Orb-3 was launched at 22:22:38 UTC. 15 seconds after liftoff, one of the launch vehicle's AJ26 (modified NK-33s) ruptured, resulting in the craft falling. The mission was scrubbed eight seconds later at 22:23:01 UTC. The subsequent investigation found that the liquid oxygen turbopump exploded, severing nearby propellant lines. This resulted in a fire that damaged various engine components. The cause of the LOX turbopump's failure remains unknown.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 217. Total number of members: 444.

October–November Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list here.


  1. China Long March 8A — 9 Guowang (16 Oct. at 01:33:00) (success)
  2. JapanItalyMexicoThailandMalaysia H3-24W — HTV-X1, various cubeSats (26 Oct. at 00:00:15) (success)
  3. China Long March 2F/G — Shenzhou 21 (31 Oct. at 15:44:00) (success)
  4. India LVM3 — GSAT-7R (2 Nov. at 11:56:00) (success)
  5. United States New Glenn — ESCAPADE Blue and Gold (13 Nov. at 20:55:01) (success)
  6. United States Atlas V 551 — Viasat 3 EMEA (14 Nov. at 03:04:00) (success)
  7. Russia Soyuz-2.1a — Soyuz MS-28 (27 Nov. at 09:27:57) (successful launch; spaceport damaged)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 30 November 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since September 2025, there are one more high-importance, three more mid-importance, 56 more low-importance, eleven more eight NA-importance, and 42 more unknown-importance articles, for a total of 113 more articles. There are also eight more B-class articles, 43 more C-class articles, 28 more Start-class articles, 25 more Stub-class articles, and three more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 26 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2025
1 — 31 December
Volume 3 — Issue 11
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • The International Space Station's eight compartments were fully occupied for the first time on 1 December, with the rebirthing of Cygnus NG-23 to Unity.
  • On 3 December, China's Zhuque-3 made the first non-American attempt at landing a booster. The booster failed to land following a landing-burn anomaly. A second attempt on the 23rd, this time using the new Long March 2A launch vehicle, also failed.
  • On 6 December, contact with NASA's MAVEN Mars orbiter was lost. The last received telemetry was from the 4th, with the fragmented transmission of the 6th suggesting that the craft was rotating in an unintended way, and possibly having changed orbit. As of 16 January 2026, the mission has not yet been officially ended, although reestablishing communications with MAVEN is considered highly improbable.
Featured Content
Article of the month

PROCYON (Proximate Object Close flyby with Optical Navigation) was an asteroid flyby space probe that was launched together with Hayabusa2 on 3 December 2014 13:22:04 (JST). It was developed by University of Tokyo and JAXA. It was a small (70 kg, approx. 60 cm cube), low cost (¥500 million) spacecraft.

It was intended to flyby the asteroid (185851) 2000 DP107 in 2016, but the plan was abandoned due to the malfunction of the ion thruster.

Image of the month
STS-116 spacewalk
Image

STS-116 was the 33rd mission of the Space Shuttle Discovery. Launched in the late evening of 6 December, the main aims of the mission were the installation of one of the International Space Station's Integrated Truss Structure segments, rewiring of the power system, and personnel exchange. Also known as ISS-12A.1, STS-116 was the first mission to include a Swedish astronaut, Christer Fuglesang. It returned to Earth in the evening of 22 December.

This image, of the first of three EVA sessions, was taken on the fourth day of the mission. Flight engineer Robert Curbeam is on the left, opposite mission specialist 3 Christer Fuglesang. The image was taken over New Zealand; the South Island is visible on the left, while the southern portion of the North Island, mostly consisting of the Wairarapa region, is visible in the top-right.

Members

New Members: none

Number of active members: 218. Total number of members: 445.

December Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See the complete list here.


  1. China Zhuque-3 — no payload (3 Dec. at 04:00) (success)
  2. South KoreaBrazilIndia HANBIT-NANO — various (22 Dec. at 12:45) (launch failure)
  3. China Long March 12A — mass simulator (23 Dec. at 02:00:00) (success)
  4. IndiaUnited States LVM3 — BlueBird-6 (24 Dec. at 03:25:30) (success)
  5. RussiaIranMontenegroKuwaitBelarus Soyuz-2.1b (1st stage), Fregat-M (2nd stage) — various (28 Dec. at 13:18:05) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 December 2025.

Monthly Changes

Since November 2025, there are one more mid-importance, 29 more low-importance, two more NA-importance, and 20 more unknown-importance class articles, for a total of 52 more articles. There are also one more FA-class articles, one less GA-class articles, ten more C-class articles, 20 more Start-class articles, eleven more Stub-class articles, and four more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 17 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 72

[edit]
Image
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 72, November–December 2025
  • Renewed partnerships
  • Spotlight: Strengthening Wikimedia Collaborations with and for Open Science
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:43, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User:Rod57 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 — 31 January
Volume 4 — Issue 1
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • NASA called off a planned spacewalk of SpaceX Crew-11 on 8 January, and later cancelled the mission outright, after one of the crewmembers, Mike Fincke, was reported to have a medical complication. This was the first time that this occurred in US history.
  • On 11 January, the Pandora spacecraft was successfully launched. Pandora is designed to study the atmospheres of transiting exoplanets, with the intention of identifying targets for future observation.
Article of the month

Exoplanetary Circumstellar Environments and Disk Explorer (EXCEDE) is a proposed space telescope for NASA's Explorer program to observe circumstellar protoplanetary and debris discs and study planet formation around nearby (within 100 parsecs) stars of spectral classes M to B. Had it been selected for development, it was proposed to launch in 2019.

The spacecraft concept proposed to use a 70 centimeter diameter telescope-mounted coronagraph called PIAA (Phase Induced Amplitude Apodized Coronagraph) to suppress starlight in order to be able to detect fainter radiation of circumstellar dust. Characterizing constitution of such disks would provide clues for planetary formation (mostly in habitable zones), while already existing exoplanets can be detected through their interaction with dust disk. The project's Principal Investigator is Glenn Schneider.

Image of the month
Wernher von Braun with the Rocketdyne F-1 engines
Image

Pictured here are two titans of spaceflight history: Dr. Wernher von Braun, one of the main figures of the early American space program and designer of both the Saturn V and V-2 rockets, and five (four visible) Rocketdyne F-1 engines, used on the Saturn V Dynamic Test Vehicle. Dr. von Braun's career is noted for a great number of achievements in human spaceflight, including the Apollo mission which successfully put human beings on the moon; nevertheless, it is burdened with the shadow of his activities in the Nazi Party, especially concerning his work on the V-2.

The engines behind him, in addition to being immense, have the honor of being the only engines used to get humans to the moon, as of the time of writing. Developed in the late 1950s, the 8,400 kilograms (18,500 lb) engines are still the most powerful single combustion chamber liquid-propellant rocket ever made.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 219. Total number of members: 446.

January Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a complete list here.


  1. United StatesCanadaUnited KingdomFinlandGermany Falcon 9 Block 5 — various, including Pandora (11 Jan. at 13:44:50) (success)
  2. IndiaThailandSpain PSLV-DL — various, including EOS-N1 and THEOS-2A (12 Jan. at 04:48:30) (launch failure)
  3. China Ceres-2 — various (17 Jan. at 04:05) (launch failure)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 January 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since December 2025, there are two fewer top-importance, two more high-importance, two more mid-importance, 19 more low-importance, 20 more NA-importance, and 31 more unknown-importance articles, for a total of 72 new articles. There are also three more GA-class, three more B-class, twelve more C-class, eleven more Start-class, and eleven more Stub-class articles, and three more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:43, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 73

[edit]
Image
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 73, January–February 2026
  • Four new partnerships
  • User survey thanks
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:05, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User:Rod57 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 — 28 February
Volume 4 — Issue 2
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • The first crewed spaceflight of 2026, SpaceX Crew-12, was launched on the 13th. Four astronauts were flown to the ISS in an atypical indirect handover that was caused by the early return of Crew-11 due to a medical emergency.
  • On the 14th, the ESA lost contact with PROBA-3, a dual-probe technological demonstration mission for chronographic high-precision formation flying. Specifically, the Chronograph Spacecraft lost orientation and drifted away from the Occulter.
Article of the month

A parking orbit is a temporary orbit used during the launch of a spacecraft. A launch vehicle follows a trajectory to the parking orbit, then coasts for a while, then engines fire again to enter the final desired trajectory.

An alternative trajectory that is used on some missions is direct injection, where the rocket fires continuously (except during staging) until its fuel is exhausted, ending with the payload on the final trajectory. This technique was first used by the Soviet Venera 1 mission to Venus in 1961.

Image of the month
Space Shuttle Endeavour prior to rendezvous with the International Space Station
Image

Part of a series of photographs, this image depicts the Space Shuttle Endeavour prior to rendezvous and docking with the International Space Station as part of STS-130 in 2010. It was taken from the station by a member of Expedition 22 when the ISS was 183 nautical miles above the South Pacific, off the coast of southern Chile. Earth is in the bottom-left; the orange part of the atmosphere is the troposphere, the white band in the middle is the stratosphere, and the blue section is the mesosphere.

Members

New Members: none

Number of active members: 219. Total number of members: 446.

February Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list here.


  1. RussiaIran Proton-M/DM-03 — Elektro–L №5, Jam-e-Jam 1 (12 Feb. at 08:52:15) (success)
  2. United States Vulcan Centaur VC4S — GSSAP-7/-8, USA-584 (12 Feb. at 09:22:00) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 28 February 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since January 2026, there are two more mid-importance, fifteen more low-importance, three more NA-importance, and ten more unknown-importance articles, for a total of 30 new articles. There are also three more B-class, thirteen more C-class, sixteen more Start-class, and ten fewer Stub-class articles, and four more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 — 31 March
Volume 4 — Issue 3
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • On 22 March, Baikonur Cosmodrome Site 31 was used for the first time since being damaged in November 2025. Progress MS-33, a resupply mission to the ISS, was launched from the site following substantial repairs.
  • ESA launched the first two satellites in the Celeste constellation on 28 March. They were launched aboard a Electron launch vehicle, marking the first time ESA has used the vehicle.
  • China's Qingzhou cargo spacecraft was tested for the first time on 30 March. Launched on the maiden flight of the Kinetica 2, the prototype performed a number of tests in coordination with another satellite.
Article of the month

OTV-2 (also known as USA-226) was the first flight of the second Boeing X-37B, an American unmanned robotic vertical-takeoff, horizontal-landing spaceplane. It was launched aboard an Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral on 5 March 2011, and landed at Vandenberg Air Force Base on 16 June 2012. It operated in low Earth orbit. Its USA-226 mission designation is part of the USA series.

The spaceplane was operated by Air Force Space Command, which has not revealed the specific identity of the payload for the first flight. The Air Force stated only that the spacecraft would "demonstrate various experiments and allow satellite sensors, subsystems, components, and associated technology to be transported into space and back."

Image of the month
STS-1
Image

STS-1 (Space Transportation System-1) was the first orbital spaceflight of NASA's Space Shuttle program. The first orbiter, Columbia, launched on April 12, 1981, and returned on April 14, 1981, 54.5 hours later, having orbited the Earth 37 times. Columbia carried a crew of two—commander John W. Young and pilot Robert L. Crippen. It was the first American crewed space flight since the Apollo–Soyuz Test Project (ASTP) in 1975. STS-1 was also the maiden test flight of a new American spacecraft to carry a crew, though it was preceded by atmospheric testing (ALT) of the orbiter and ground testing of the Space Shuttle system.

The launch occurred on the 20th anniversary of Vostok 1, the first human spaceflight, performed by Yuri Gagarin for the USSR. This was a coincidence rather than a celebration of the anniversary; a technical problem had prevented STS-1 from launching two days earlier, as was planned.

Members

New Members: Swedmark111 (26 March)

Number of active members: 220. Total number of members: 447.

March Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list here.


  1. United States Alpha Block 1 — ICOR SV (11 Mar. at 00:50:00) (success)
  2. Russia Soyuz-2.1a — Progress MS-33 (22 Mar. at 11:59:51) (success)
  3. United StatesEuropean Union Rocket Lab Electron — Celeste IOD-1/-2 (28 Mar. at 09:14:00) (success)
  4. China Kinetica 2 — New March 01/02, TS 01 (30 Mar. at 11:00:00) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 March 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since February 2026, there are 16 more Low-importance, eleven more NA-importance, and eleven more Unknown-importance articles, for a total of 38 new articles. There are also one more GA-class, one more B-class, 14 more C-class, 19 more Start-class, one fewer Stub-class articles, and three more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:38, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of satellites of Mars for merging to List of Mars orbiters

[edit]
Image
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of satellites of Mars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be merged into List of Mars orbiters.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of satellites of Mars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Doeze (talk) 15:42, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 — 30 April
Volume 4 — Issue 4
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
  • Artemis II, the first crewed mission to the moon since Apollo 17, was launched on 1 April. During the lunar flyby, it became the furthest spaceflight in human history on the 6th. Integrity, the re-entry vehicle, splashed down southwest of San Diego on the 11th.
  • On 8 April, the first satellites of the Celeste (LEO-PNT) constellation began broadcasting navigation signals for the first time.
Featured Content

The image "STS-133 Space Shuttle Discovery after undocking" was promoted to Featured Media status on 30 April. It was nominated by Moonreach.

Article of the month

The Gallaudet Eleven were a group of eleven deaf men recruited in the late 1950s and 1960s to participate in a joint research program led by NASA and the U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (later changed to Aerospace Medical Association) to study the effects of prolonged weightlessness on the human body. They were selected for participation in the study because damage they had sustained to the vestibular systems of their inner ears had granted them immunity to motion sickness, making them uniquely resilient to certain physical studies that would have made other test subjects nauseous.

Image of the month
Clayton Anderson under weightlessness
Image

A demonstration of weightlessness by astronaut Clayton Anderson, particularly its effect on liquids. The water's surface tension keeps it in a sphere, which here results in the light reflecting off of Anderson being refracted in such a way that it appears upside-down. It is only upside-down relative to Anderson, as there is no "up" or "down" in a weightless environment beyond convention.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 225. Total number of members: 454.

April Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list .


  1. United StatesArgentinaSouth KoreaSaudi ArabiaGermany Space Launch System Block 1 — various, including Artemis II (1 Apr. at 22:35:12) (success)
  2. China Tianlong-3 — unknown (3 Apr. at 04:17:00) (launch failure)
  3. United States New Glenn — BlueBird 7 (19 Apr. at 11:25:00) (launch failure)
  4. United States Falcon 9 Block 5 — USA-585 (21 Apr. 06:53:00) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 30 April 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since March 2026, there are one fewer Mid-importance, 28 more Low-importance, four more NA-importance, and 27 more Unknown-importance articles, for a total of 58 new articles. There are also one fewer GA-class, five more B-class, 33 more C-class, two fewer Start-class, 23 more Stub-class articles, and three more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 74

[edit]
Image
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 74, March–April 2026
  • New partnership: Swissdox
  • User survey results
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 10:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User:Rod57 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 — 31 May
Volume 4 — Issue 5
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month
Image
Polyus on the Energia rocket

The Polyus spacecraft (Russian: Полюс, pole), also known as Polus, Skif-DM, GRAU index 17F19DM, was a prototype Soviet orbital weapons platform designed to destroy Strategic Defense Initiative satellites with a megawatt carbon-dioxide laser. It had a Functional Cargo Block derived from a TKS spacecraft to control its orbit and it could launch test targets to demonstrate the fire control system.

Image of the month
Integrated Truss Structure of the ISS
Image

This graphic is an exploded view of the Integrated Truss Structure, the long segment that has the ISS' distinctive solar panels. The first piece, Z1, was installed in October 2000, while the most recent addition, S6, being installed in October 2007; the current configuration of the ITS dates to June 2023. In addition to providing electricity via the solar panels, the ITS is the location of energy storage, with battery assemblies on the P4/6 and S4/6 segments. These each consist of 24 lithium-ion batteries, for a total of 96 batteries.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 230. Total number of members: 460.

May Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list here.


  1. China Zhuque-2E — Dingzhihua Shiyan Zaihe (14 May at 03:00:00) (success)
  2. ItalyChinaEuropean Union Vega C — SMILE
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 May 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since April 2026, there are one fewer Top-importance, two fewer High-importance, eight more Mid-importance, 17 more Low-importance, two more NA-importance, and twenty more Unknown-importance articles, for a total of 44 new articles. There are also five more B-class, eleven more C-class, six more Start-class, 18 more Stub-class articles, and one more list.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 75

[edit]
Image
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 75, May–June 2026
  • New partnerships: The Telegraph, Marg, The Tribune newspapers
  • Tech tip: Expired partnerships
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 14:43, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User:Rod57 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 — 30 June
Volume 4 — Issue 6
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month
Image
A last-quarter crescent moon above Earth's horizon is featured in this image photographed by an Expedition 24 crew member.

Expedition 24 was the 24th long-duration mission to the International Space Station (ISS). Expedition 24 initially had two planned spacewalks, one Russian and one American Extra-vehicular Activity (EVA). The U.S. EVA was re-planned and a second U.S. EVA was added.

Image of the month
NASA spacecraft comparison
Image

This graphic, created c. 1964, compares the relative sizes of the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo spacecraft (right, bottom-to-top). Each successive craft is larger and has a greater crew capacity than the previous; additionally, while the Mercury and Gemini craft are fairly similar, the Apollo craft (actually two craft, the Apollo command and service module and Apollo Lunar Module) is substantially different: the reentry module is more conical, and has a much large thruster. These changes, and the lunar lander, are present because Apollo was the first crewed missions to the moon, with the changes necessary to ensure that the crew could return to Earth alive. A similar pattern can be found in the comparison of the launch vehicles on the left: while the Mercury (Atlas-D) and Gemini (Titan II) vehicles are similar in size, differing primarily in height, the Apollo vehicle, the Saturn V, is significantly larger, both for the need to transport the CSM and LEM, but also in order to get to the Moon in the first place.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 232. Total number of members: 463.

June Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list Here.


  1. China Long March 12B — 2 Qianfan satellites (1 Jun. at 08:40:00) (success)
  2. JapanFrance H3-30S — various (12 Jun. at 00:53:59) (success)
  3. China Long March 3B/E — Shijian-31 (16 Jun. at 09:45:00) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 30 June 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since May 2026, there are one more Mid-importance, 12 more Low-importance, ten fewer NA-importance, and six more Unknown-importance articles, for a total of nine new articles. There are also four more GA-class, seven more B-class, five more C-class, five more Start-class, three more Stub-class articles, and two more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 — 31 July
Volume 4 — Issue 7
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month
Image
The ISS in 2001 showing solar panels.

Night Glider mode (or "XVV Night Glider mode") is one of the procedures for orienting the solar arrays on the International Space Station.

Normally the photovoltaic solar arrays of the space station track the sun. However, one of the main causes of orbital decay on the space station is that the area of the solar arrays, brushing against the thin residual atmosphere at orbital altitude, results in a small amount of aerodynamic drag. The drag can be lowered by orienting the solar arrays in "sun slicer" mode, where they fly edge-on to the orbital direction, rather than tracking the sun, however, this orientation reduces the power produced. The "night glider" mode is a hybrid orientation, where the solar arrays track the sun during the period when the space station is illuminated, are rotated edge-on to the orbital direction when it enters in the Earth's shadow, and then are returned to their tracking position when the station re-enters sunlight. This reduces the average drag on the station's solar arrays by about 30 percent, with no reduction in power.

Image of the month
Buzz Aldrin and Apollo 11 Lunar Lander
Image

Taken by Neil Armstrong, this image shows Buzz Aldrin removing the passive seismometer, part of the Passive Seismic Experiment Package (PSEP), from the lander. Like all experimental instruments, the PSEP was stored in the lander's Scientific Equipment (SEQ) bay; on Apollo 11, it was stored along with the Laser Ranging Retroreflector (LRRR). Initially, NASA planned a full array of experiments for all Apollo missions, but the uncertainty of the first lunar landing led to only these two experiments being conducted. This first package was called the Early Apollo Surface Experiments Package (EASEP); later missions carried the full Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP).

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 206. Total number of members: 466.

July Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list here.


  1. United StatesMarshall Islands Pegasus XL — Swift boost mission (3 Jul. at 04:24:00) (success
  2. China Long March 10B — Hulianwang Jishu Shiyan (10 Jul. at 04:15:00) (success)
  3. India Vikram-1 — SCOPE, SOLARAS S3 (18 Jul. at 06:35:30) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 July 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since June 2026, there are three more High-importance, two more Mid-importance, thirteen more Low-importance, five more NA-importance, and ten more Unknown-importance articles, for a total of 46 new articles. There are also four more B-class, nineteen more C-class, eleven more Start-class, and two more Stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 76

[edit]
Image
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 76, July–August 2026
  • New partnership: The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • New Partnership Manager joins the team
  • Spotlight: TWL page on Meta
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 11:44, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

(This message was sent to User:Rod57 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

New cross-language page link: Thallium barium calcium copper oxide

[edit]

A new page Tallium-bárium-kalcium-réz-oxid on the Hungarian Wikipedia has been linked to your page Thallium barium calcium copper oxide via Wikidata (Q7709710).

You will not be notified in the future about new articles linked to any of the articles you have created, if you wish to opt-in to receiving these notifications, please follow the opt-in instructions.

NervousBot (talk) 14:02, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Image The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 — 31 August
Volume 4 — Issue 8
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month

James F. Woodward (1941 – August 9, 2025) was an American physicist who was professor emeritus of history and an adjunct professor of physics at California State University, Fullerton. He is best known for a physics hypothesis that he proposed in 1990, later expanded, that predicts several physical effects that he refers to as 'Mach effects'. Woodward claimed the effect could be used as a reactionless drive for space travel.

Image of the month
Test inflation of PAGEOS, a balloon satellite
Image

The Passive Geodetic Earth Orbiting Satellite (PAGEOS) was the first dedicated geodetic surveying satellite. PAGEOS was the culmination of a series of balloon satellites that started in 1960 with Project Echo. These satellites were commissioned following the launch of Sputnik 1, as the United States was eager to catch up to the Soviet Union during the Space Race. Construction of PAGEOS was undertaken by the Gilmore Schjeldahl#Schjeldahl Company, founded by the same man who invented the sickness bag. This image shows a test inflation of the 30 m (100 ft), 57 kg (125 lb) satellite performed on 5 August, 1965.

Members

New Members: none

Number of active members: 206. Total number of members: 466.

August Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list here.


  1. China Zhuque-3 — Honghu-03 (18 Aug. at 23:35) (success)
  2. United States Falcon Heavy — Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (30 Aug. at 11:26:00) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 31 August 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since July 2026, there are one more Mid-importance, 15 more Low-importance, ten more NA-importance, and twenty more Unknown-importance articles, for a total of 46 new articles. There are also two more B-class, three more C-class, 21 more Start-class, six more Stub-class articles, and three more lists.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply